The Wilmington station is to be on channel 2. I'm pretty sure the NJ channel 3's proposed transmission site is 4 Times Square.
What happened....
Back in the 1980s, channel 9 in NYC was in trouble. In trouble with the FCC over serious non-engineering violations. A law got pushed through Congress which would require the FCC to assign at least one VHF commercial channel to each state if technically feasible, and to require the Commission to renew the license of any commercial VHF station willing to move to a state not having such a station, again, if technically feasible.
New Jersey and Delaware were the only two such states. It was not technically feasible to assign any completely new VHF channels in either state. (channels 2/4/5/7/9/11/13 NYC and 3/6/10/12 Philadelphia blocked 11 of the 12 VHF channels; the remaining channel, 8, was blocked by Lancaster, PA and New Haven, CT) A VHF channel could only be added if a NYC or Philly station agreed to move to one of these states.
Of course, the law was written for the purpose of saving Channel 9's license. It succeeded. Channel 9 moved from NYC to Secaucus, NJ. (although the transmitter remained, and remains, on Manhattan)
Now, New Jersey had a commercial VHF channel so the law no longer had any effect with regard to that state. None of the Philadelphia stations were in trouble -- and it was easier to remain in Philadelphia -- so nobody ever took the FCC up on the opportunity to move to Delaware.
Fast-forward to the DTV transition. NYC's Channel 9 (OK, Secaucus' Channel 9) is still on channel 9 -- but it's transmitting on a UHF frequency. So, there is again no commercial VHF station in New Jersey. (and nobody ever did take the FCC up on the opportunity to move from Philadelphia to Delaware)
But now, nobody wants to be on low-band VHF channels 2-6. Which means it's now technically feasible to assign four new VHF channels in these two states.
You could just petition the FCC to assign one channel to each state. But if you do that, you almost certainly trigger an auction. You may not get the channel you got assigned, and if you do get it you might spend millions of $$$ to get it.
PMCM had a better idea. They bought two inexpensive VHF digital stations out west, then told the FCC they were willing to move them to NJ and Delaware.
The FCC didn't buy it -- arguing that the law only covered stations whose technical facilities were mutually-exclusive with operation from NJ/DE. (for example, Channel 9 could not be used in NYC and Secaucus simultaneously; there would be horrendous interference. However, channel 3 could certainly be used in Ely, Nevada and North Jersey simultaneously without interference!)
PMCM took it to the Appeals Court. The Court ruled there was nothing in the law limiting its application to mutually-exclusive channels. (while I'm not a lawyer, it seems to me the Appeals Court absolutely got it right) The FCC was ordered to allow the reallocations.
And the Commission did so on the 15th. These changes *HAVE BEEN GRANTED*, as of eight days ago. PMCM still has to file some paperwork to get the permits to move the channels, but that's pretty much just a formality.
=====
Sure, VHF-Low is not the best place to be for DTV. But the law in question only covered moves of VHF stations. None of the high-VHF channels are usable for new stations -- they're all precluded by existing stations in New York, Pennsylvania, Washington, Baltimore, or three non-commercial stations in Delaware & New Jersey.
In any case, I suspect these operators find the *theoretical* coverage more important than the *actual* coverage. The theoretical coverage radius of PMCM's New Jersey station will be 104km. (about 64 miles) Sure, you won't receive channel 3 64 miles away with an indoor antenna -- but if your cable operator's headend is within 64 miles then they'll need to deliver KVNV to their subscribers.
IOW these stations will be widely carried on cable/satellite/FIOS/etc..