• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

A blogcritic's review of Dixie Chicks single

Re: Another point of view

> I hope the Dixie Chicks and do well, and hope it serves as a
> reminder to all that there can be consequences of mixing
> politics and music. Sometimes people should stick to what
> they are good at. If you are given a platform for musical
> ability, use it for music. LEt the politicians talk
> politics.

With all due respect, politics and music have gone together since this country was founded. Taking this into a broader conversation not directed at you personally, what is different now is that corporations with business before the federal government are more willing to avoid controversy with the party in power with whom they have money-making business to transact. And when the corporation or the station agrees with the political agenda, the way suddenly becomes clear for these people to -not- stick with what they are good at - programming radio stations, and instead throw their cowboy hats into the political debate. Add that to concerns about the bottom line if the local advertiser threatens to pull out and the almighty dollar becomes the ultimate arbiter of the playlist.

Cumulus and Cox are said to have ordered Dixie Chicks music totally off their stations. No local station involvement required. Let's not forget KRMD's 33,000 pound tractor which smashed Dixie Chicks CDs at a public rally (be thankful they didn't do a modern day equivalent of a Nazi book burning rally).

I certainly haven't forgotten about Clear Channel's Rally for America which mysteriously popped up in several cities around the country using the same slogans, signs, and pro-war message, despite Clear Channel's denials that this wasn't anything beyond a spontaneous coincidence by local stations that were all owned by this company. Yeah, as spontaneous as the Jack format appearing practically overnight. How many of those CC stations were still playing Dixie Chicks music while running these dog and pony war rallies?

Let musicians be musicians. If you don't like their message, don't buy their music. But if you are running a radio station that caters to the community as a whole, it's certainly not okay to tell an artist they need to stay out of one side of politics or their songs are tossed off the air, (while stations trumpet schlock pro-war songs like they are the second coming of the National Anthem) especially if, at the same time, your station is using the promo budget to rent a tractor to smash CDs and hold pro-war rallies.
 
Re: Another point of view

The Johnny Cash song was "The One On The Right Is On The Left".

The irony of the whole Dixie Chicks controversy is that around the same time of the controversy, country radio was playing Kid Rock and Sheryl Crow's "Picture" even AFTER Crow made her notorius anti-Bush remarks at the Grammies. That just struck me odd and somewhat hypocritical at the time.


> I agree with you in the sense that Country Radio treated the
> Dixie Chicks unfairly.
>
> I think they will always have the stigma of making comments
> about the president, at a time when he was popular, and many
> people believed his line about the war. Country Radio
> stations lean patriotic. And even though a good patriot can
> still take a leader to task, Country Music relies on a
> simpler cut and dry logic. Really it is "You are with us or
> are against us."
>
> The artform that really is dominated by "Red State" U.S.
> America does not differentiate between valid criticism and
> treason. It really is and either/or situation. The President
> is commander in Chief and the country is at war. Therefore
> if you are a good citizen of the country, you will support
> the president and the War. This fallacious logic hurt the
> Dixie Chicks. It is ok to love your country but not the
> decisions the leaders make. But that is not true in some
> places, and unfortunately, these are the places where
> 'Country' radio usually is the most dominant.
>
> Since they are called the Dixie Chicks, they could not break
> into another format. Even though they may have recorded one
> country song amid all of the pop songs that charted for
> them, they would have a hard time making it in any other
> genre besides 'Country' music. Just the essence of their
> name would not jive well on a pop station or soft rock, or
> regular rock.
>
> I hope the Dixie Chicks and do well, and hope it serves as a
> reminder to all that there can be consequences of mixing
> politics and music. Sometimes people should stick to what
> they are good at. If you are given a platform for musical
> ability, use it for music. LEt the politicians talk
> politics.
>
> They must not have heard Johnny Cash's "The one on the
> left". I think that's the title anyway, but something about
> mixing politics with the folk songs of the land. It is a
> good song with a good lesson.
>
 
Re: Another point of view

"Cumulus and Cox are said to have ordered Dixie Chicks music totally off their stations. No local station involvement required. Let's not forget KRMD's 33,000 pound tractor which smashed Dixie Chicks CDs at a public rally (be thankful they didn't do a modern day equivalent of a Nazi book burning rally)."

But the reality of the situation is that even though most country stations didn't create the controversy, we still have to deal with it. The reality is that right now, the risks of playing the Dixie Chicks outweigh the rewards (especially with THIS song). As much as I still am uncomfortable about the controversy, it happened and we can't go back and change history.




> > I hope the Dixie Chicks and do well, and hope it serves as
> a
> > reminder to all that there can be consequences of mixing
> > politics and music. Sometimes people should stick to what
> > they are good at. If you are given a platform for musical
> > ability, use it for music. LEt the politicians talk
> > politics.
>
> With all due respect, politics and music have gone together
> since this country was founded. Taking this into a broader
> conversation not directed at you personally, what is
> different now is that corporations with business before the
> federal government are more willing to avoid controversy
> with the party in power with whom they have money-making
> business to transact. And when the corporation or the
> station agrees with the political agenda, the way suddenly
> becomes clear for these people to -not- stick with what they
> are good at - programming radio stations, and instead throw
> their cowboy hats into the political debate. Add that to
> concerns about the bottom line if the local advertiser
> threatens to pull out and the almighty dollar becomes the
> ultimate arbiter of the playlist.
>
> Cumulus and Cox are said to have ordered Dixie Chicks music
> totally off their stations. No local station involvement
> required. Let's not forget KRMD's 33,000 pound tractor
> which smashed Dixie Chicks CDs at a public rally (be
> thankful they didn't do a modern day equivalent of a Nazi
> book burning rally).
>
> I certainly haven't forgotten about Clear Channel's Rally
> for America which mysteriously popped up in several cities
> around the country using the same slogans, signs, and
> pro-war message, despite Clear Channel's denials that this
> wasn't anything beyond a spontaneous coincidence by local
> stations that were all owned by this company. Yeah, as
> spontaneous as the Jack format appearing practically
> overnight. How many of those CC stations were still playing
> Dixie Chicks music while running these dog and pony war
> rallies?
>
> Let musicians be musicians. If you don't like their
> message, don't buy their music. But if you are running a
> radio station that caters to the community as a whole, it's
> certainly not okay to tell an artist they need to stay out
> of one side of politics or their songs are tossed off the
> air, (while stations trumpet schlock pro-war songs like they
> are the second coming of the National Anthem) especially if,
> at the same time, your station is using the promo budget to
> rent a tractor to smash CDs and hold pro-war rallies.
>
 
Country radio needs to be a tad more careful with the Dixie Chicks. Not playing ANY of their music i think is a mistake especially with 25-35 year old women.If i was programming against a station that played zero dixie chicks i would strategically pepper them in. The old stuff that is. Afterall aren't we in the business to create a buzz and play the hits? Those two hicks in birmingham in the 60's that burned Beatle records sure didn't make a dent very long. Maybe they did it to get a buzz which we be great but if they did it and continued not playing beatles the next few years THEIR foolish mistake.I remember introducing dance music in '86-87 in Birmingham on a dying station. Everybody told me nobody wants to hear dance music in Birmingham. We went#1 in less than 3 months and stayed #1 in 18-34 and top 3 25-54.Moral of the story, conventional wisdom doesn't alway's work especially in entertainment. ;D
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom