DXDXDX said:
Something I've noticed...(then again maybe only I'm weird enough to see this if it even exists!)...there seems to be a sort of "distancing" between mainstream Christianity, including Christian radio and the Salvation Army. Has anyone else noticed this?
I think I see what you are asking about. First, let's agree on terminology. I suspect you are not visualizing "mainstream" Christianity but "Evangelical" Christianity when you ask the question.
First, I know that our friends who are part of "Evangelical" churches will protest and say: "WE ARE mainstream Christianity." In shear numbers and in growth the Evangelicals are vibrant and somewhat dominant in today's display of Christianity in America.
For people who discuss churches and what makes them different, "Mainstream" is a terminology used to describe the churches that were in the forefront... maybe in the first half of the 20th Century. We are talking about Methodists, some of the Presbyterians, some of the Lutherans, the Disciples of Christ branch of The Christian Church, the American Baptists, the UCC and others who back in the 1950 and 1960s put a lot of energy into discussing the possibility of merging into one large church group. Do a search on COCU..... Council on Church Union.
If you will let me use my understanding of these terms, let me put it this way: There is some distance between the Evangelicals and The Salvation Army.
I think a lot of people who study this situation think of The Salvation Army as part of the group I choose to refer to as "Mainstream Christianity". I think if you will look into history and theology, the Salvation Army is grouped with The Methodist Church, The church of The Nazarene, The Wesleyan Church and some others. This collection is sometimes referred to as "Holiness Churches".
We have been through a period of time for the last century or so where Christians in the U.S. (not including our Catholic friends) divided into two camps who tried to simplify the Christian faith as follows: There are two kinds of churches... those who believe salvation is delivered through a major conscious decision on the part of an adult or one old enough to make his/her own decision. These churches shied away from programs that would in any way give the impression that anyone there thought salvation was the result of "works".
The Mainline churches have during all this time not been timid about engaging in social work and activities to the point that some people in those churches may indeed think their good works are their path to salvation. When you talk to the theologians in those churches you will find their theology about salvation is not as skewed as some would claim on this subject.
NOW. What is the Salvation Army best know for? Shelters for the homeless. Warehouses full of clothing and furniture available to those in need. Getting the whole society to joining them in financing their good works with the kettles at Christmas time. And sending their "Army" in following floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, etc.
We are now in an era when the Evangelical Churches have re-evaluated what the Bible has to say about coming to the aid of "widows and orphans" that are so often mentioned in scripture. I suspect the leaders of many Evangelical groups are much more willing to reach out and work together with The Salvation Army in disaster relief issues and maybe in ongoing community benevolence programs.
While you are making your observations about how the church and Christian radio relates to groups such as The Salvation Army, you may notice there has also been a big chasm between the Evangelicals and the Seventh Day Adventists, the Mormons and the Jehovah's Witnesses. OH! And for some a chasm between them and what I have described as The Mainline Church.
I am reminded of the old saying: I asked him what time it was, and he tried to teach me how to make a watch. Hope my explanation did not overwhelm you.