Don't you mean Bob Lacey?amos said:i'm not trying to take anything away from murph, i always liked him and was fortunate to have been in the studio with him a couple of times..
but his site talks about how when he came to town that big ways finally beat wbt. i'm pretty sure jay thomas had already beaten ty boyd before murphy came to big ways.
or is my memory that bad?
-amos
I don't recall WBT ever being top 40. They were very different from WAYS, or at least after WSOC went all-news they weren't too bad.Matt Smith said:Actually, H. A. Thompson did mornings between Ty Boyd and Bob Lacey. When WBT went from MOR to Top-40, Boyd continued doing mornings for a year or so. Lacey started out doing the "Lacey Listens" talk show at night. When Boyd decided to move full-time to Television, Thompson was hired from WSOC (the old AM 930) to do mornings. About two years later, Thompson moved to his longtime midday slot and Lacey took over mornings.
That would put Lacey doing mornings around 1974 or so.
Later . . .
vchimpanzee said:I don't recall WBT ever being top 40.Matt Smith said:Thompson was hired from WSOC (the old AM 930) to do mornings. About two years later, Thompson moved to his longtime midday slot and Lacey took over mornings.
i know that (john?) kilgo did mornings at ways between jack gale and jay thomas
Well, by the time WSOC went all-news WBT did not sound like top 40 to me. WAYS was louder.jtudor said:vchimpanzee said:I don't recall WBT ever being top 40.Matt Smith said:Thompson was hired from WSOC (the old AM 930) to do mornings. About two years later, Thompson moved to his longtime midday slot and Lacey took over mornings.
http://www.reelradio.com/ideas/index.html#wbtgmrh
According to this article written by Tom McMurray who ran the changeover of WBT from MOR to Top 40, It was indeed Top 40, and that is exactly how I remember it, and I listened every day when I was not on the air myself. Also according to this article and my memory H. A. Thompson was there from day one of the changeover.
I agree about WAYS, but unfortunately where I was working when the change to top 40 happened, I could not pick up WAYS. The 5kw signal even on 610 just didn't make it into the mountains at Sparta, but BT's 50kw signal boomed in.vchimpanzee said:Well, by the time WSOC went all-news WBT did not sound like top 40 to me. WAYS was louder.jtudor said:vchimpanzee said:I don't recall WBT ever being top 40.
http://www.reelradio.com/ideas/index.html#wbtgmrh
According to this article written by Tom McMurray who ran the changeover of WBT from MOR to Top 40, It was indeed Top 40, and that is exactly how I remember it, and I listened every day when I was not on the air myself. Also according to this article and my memory H. A. Thompson was there from day one of the changeover.
WFNZ, the former WAYS, is directional. The Observer reporters always blame the 5 kw signal for the problems, but a 5 kw signal goes much further at 610 than at, say, 1580. And that made the directional pattern necessary, and that's why they have always had problems.jtudor said:I agree about WAYS, but unfortunately where I was working when the change to top 40 happened, I could not pick up WAYS. The 5 kw signal even on 610 just didn't make it into the mountains at Sparta, but BT's 50kw signal boomed in.vchimpanzee said:Well, by the time WSOC went all-news WBT did not sound like top 40 to me. WAYS was louder.jtudor said:vchimpanzee said:I don't recall WBT ever being top 40.
http://www.reelradio.com/ideas/index.html#wbtgmrh
According to this article written by Tom McMurray who ran the changeover of WBT from MOR to Top 40, It was indeed Top 40, and that is exactly how I remember it, and I listened every day when I was not on the air myself. Also according to this article and my memory H. A. Thompson was there from day one of the changeover.
The average listener, and that will include all newspaper reporters does not understand directional antenna systems, and will avoid discussing them when it comes up to avoid confusion on thier part or the part of others.vchimpanzee said:WFNZ, the former WAYS, is directional. The Observer reporters always blame the 5 kw signal for the problems, but a 5 kw signal goes much further at 610 than at, say, 1580. And that made the directional pattern necessary, and that's why they have always had problems.jtudor said:I agree about WAYS, but unfortunately where I was working when the change to top 40 happened, I could not pick up WAYS. The 5 kw signal even on 610 just didn't make it into the mountains at Sparta, but BT's 50kw signal boomed in.vchimpanzee said:Well, by the time WSOC went all-news WBT did not sound like top 40 to me. WAYS was louder.jtudor said:vchimpanzee said:I don't recall WBT ever being top 40.
http://www.reelradio.com/ideas/index.html#wbtgmrh
According to this article written by Tom McMurray who ran the changeover of WBT from MOR to Top 40, It was indeed Top 40, and that is exactly how I remember it, and I listened every day when I was not on the air myself. Also according to this article and my memory H. A. Thompson was there from day one of the changeover.
Yes, WFNZ is most definitely directional during the day. I think WSJS at 600 in Winston-Salem is one reason.jtudor said:The average listener, and that will include all newspaper reporters does not understand directional antenna systems, and will avoid discussing them when it comes up to avoid confusion on thier part or the part of others.vchimpanzee said:WFNZ, the former WAYS, is directional. The Observer reporters always blame the 5 kw signal for the problems, but a 5 kw signal goes much further at 610 than at, say, 1580. And that made the directional pattern necessary, and that's why they have always had problems.jtudor said:I agree about WAYS, but unfortunately where I was working when the change to top 40 happened, I could not pick up WAYS. The 5 kw signal even on 610 just didn't make it into the mountains at Sparta, but BT's 50kw signal boomed in.vchimpanzee said:Well, by the time WSOC went all-news WBT did not sound like top 40 to me. WAYS was louder.jtudor said:vchimpanzee said:I don't recall WBT ever being top 40.
http://www.reelradio.com/ideas/index.html#wbtgmrh
According to this article written by Tom McMurray who ran the changeover of WBT from MOR to Top 40, It was indeed Top 40, and that is exactly how I remember it, and I listened every day when I was not on the air myself. Also according to this article and my memory H. A. Thompson was there from day one of the changeover.
You are most correct about the distance the signal will carry. But was / is the 610 signal directional during the day? I know they were at night, but directional daytimers are much more rare than those with a directional pattern at night.
I didn't read this at home but I sent the link in an email to myself and just read it at a library. Fascinating. I put some of the information in the Wikipedia article, but I left the format as is because that's what I've always heard. Furthermore, WBT's own site says it was "adult contemporary" station of the year in 1976. The change in format would have to be explained.jtudor said:vchimpanzee said:I don't recall WBT ever being top 40.Matt Smith said:Thompson was hired from WSOC (the old AM 930) to do mornings. About two years later, Thompson moved to his longtime midday slot and Lacey took over mornings.
http://www.reelradio.com/ideas/index.html#wbtgmrh
According to this article written by Tom McMurray who ran the changeover of WBT from MOR to Top 40, It was indeed Top 40, and that is exactly how I remember it, and I listened every day when I was not on the air myself. Also according to this article and my memory H. A. Thompson was there from day one of the changeover.