• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

A puzzling artifact--ideas, anyone?

I'll not even pretend to know what you mean by "anti-fact". Are you claiming I didn't hear the artifact, that HD radio is perfect? Wow. Even I don't believe that! Everybody (stations, listeners, manufacturers) is learning. When something is obviously amiss, and audibly so, it's important to point it out, and try to figure out why.

My guess is a combination of aggressive compression/limiting combined with Neural-type pre-processing. The aggressive processing will push what would have been low-level details forward, where they're more likely to cause artifacts from low bitrate coding. Neural-type pre-processing would tweak the incoming audio in an attempt to prevent these types of artifacts. In my experience, splashy, sustained highs...like cymbal crashes and tinkly bells, is where artifacts are most likely to show up with music...so it makes sense that these are the types of things that pre-processing would attempt to "correct" before encoding. Just a guess. Got a better one? A REAL one?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom