• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

A reason why advertisers don't target 55+ audiences

Status
Not open for further replies.
1. Cable is national. One buy.
2. Cable is video. The bulk of products that do target 55+ need a visual presentation.
3. Local radio is harder to buy, with a need to select stations on a market by market basis.
4. The products advertised specifically target older people.
What are the ad buys for talk radio. How many 20 somethings are listing to AM at 12 noon.
 
What are the ad buys for talk radio. How many 20 somethings are listing to AM at 12 noon.
Have you listened to talk radio? Lots of debt reduction, time-share escape, and similar scheme/scam advertisers. Political advertising is strong, too. Hardly any 20-somethings are listening, but most talkers that depend on nationally syndicated programming are running on a shoestring budget, so advertising to oldsters covers expenses nicely.
 
What are the ad buys for talk radio. How many 20 somethings are listing to AM at 12 noon.
A lot of the ad buys for talk are either the few national campaigns that can use audio-only (debt reduction, accident attorneys, etc.) or they are from local accounts that do find older customers of value. These can be pain treatment physicians, car dealers selling vehicles that appeal to seniors, banks with mortgage re-fi options or reverse mortgages and the like.

In large markets, stations like KFI and WSB and WLW that have big ratings will get local agency accounts for clients that do find senior customers profitable and, mostly, local direct accounts ranging from mattress stores to car dealers to roofers to senior services like home care providers.

For example, where I live in the Palm Springs market, the Porsche dealer only puts radio ads on a couple of stations that have 45+ appeal as they find most of their customers to be upper income older people or retired folks.

In markets outside the biggest 30, the amount of national or regional agency buys are much more limited. By the time you get to market 100 and below, non-local agency business is minimal. And if you are in market #150 or so, unless you are #1 or #2 in a client's target demo you will never see agency business.

I don't know whether the stations I named stream with their local ads, but if you listen a bit you will see that there are plenty of accounts, but they are significantly more local direct ones and for a different mix of advertisers than you'd hear on the local CHR or Urban or Country stations.
 
We see posts often on Radio Discussions questioning why stations don't program to older listeners. Often, such posts are antagonistic towards radio stations who have nothing to do with how major advertisers plan campaigns.

So, today I saw an article with this headline:

"Just over half of Americans over the age of 65 are earning under $30,000 a year, and it shows how stark the retirement crisis is."

This is from MSN

And it says, in fair usage part:
  • A new report from Senator Bernie Sanders signals a looming retirement crisis for Americans.
  • Many older Americans are financially vulnerable, with over half living on incomes of $30,000 or less a year.
So when one of us who has a comfortable retirement income now or planned in the future, it's important to understand in a discussion of radio that there are solid reasons why advertisers won't buy on older-leaning stations. And with no ad budgets, no stations can survive with formats that play music from the 50's and 60's and even a lot of the 70's.

While I understand this fact, another fact is the terrestrial radio medium itself is having an aging crisis.

Younger people aren't listening (much of their music is unplayable on the radio anyway unless the language restrictions go away.) Ad agencies are spending more on digital marketing. Much of today's electronics do not have a radio built in and you can't force manufacturers to include them.

Gen-X (which began turning 55 in 2019) is also the very last generation that needed radio. Most Millennials were the MP3 Generation. Who mostly used digital sites like Napster and Limewire and could get what they wanted easily. Either influenced by the radio. Or much of it, not.)

I'm not saying Millennials don't listen to radio. But to them, radio wasn't really a necessity like it was for Gen-X and Boomers. So I consider them post-radio. It's much more so for Gen-Z.

FB_IMG_1707211026070.jpg
 
Lemme blow your mind. See, there are these things called radio edits. You can bleep, blank, or (my favorite) reverse the offending word. Been around forever. It's how Pink Floyd's "Money" got on AM Top 40 radio 51 years ago.
But the dirty words today are largely on hip-hop tracks. That's an audience that demands its music "keep it real," obscenities and all, because that's the language of the urban streets. Pink Floyd, all of whom were solidly British middle class, were just putting b---s--- in that song for the shock value. The listeners couldn't care less whether they heard that one word or not.
 
And, in this argument, we are assuming that everyone over 18 only likes hip-hop. How about reggaetón, country, most CHR, Regional Me I an, Hot AC and other formats that are preferred by many, even in younger demos?
 
Lemme blow your mind. See, there are these things called radio edits. You can bleep, blank, or (my favorite) reverse the offending word. Been around forever. It's how Pink Floyd's "Money" got on AM Top 40 radio 51 years ago.
So do "record companies", to use a possibly anachronistic term, still provide radio edits, a/k/a clean edits - or has radio fallen down so far on their list of priorities that they figure that someone wanting a clean edit can do it themselves ?

In Europe, I've never heard radio edits. They just let it rip, even in countries with a high number of people proficient in English.
 
Lemme blow your mind. See, there are these things called radio edits. You can bleep, blank, or (my favorite) reverse the offending word. Been around forever. It's how Pink Floyd's "Money" got on AM Top 40 radio 51 years ago.
What records sell more, clean or uncensored. When the mothers against foul language or what ever it was back in the 90s got parental advisories on everything those records sold like hot cakes.
 
What records sell more, clean or uncensored. When the mothers against foul language or what ever it was back in the 90s got parental advisories on everything those records sold like hot cakes.
Proof that people who try to legislate morals tend to achieve results that are the opposite of the intended.

The fist name that sprang to mind in this context was Anita Bryant. A long time ago, but to most people she just made a fool out of herself: Anita Bryant - Wikipedia. A certain congresswoman from Georgia seems to be cast from the same mold...
 
Proof that people who try to legislate morals tend to achieve results that are the opposite of the intended.

The fist name that sprang to mind in this context was Anita Bryant. A long time ago, but to most people she just made a fool out of herself: Anita Bryant - Wikipedia. A certain congresswoman from Georgia seems to be cast from the same mold...
"Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve," Bryant used to say. (Assuming that's in the Wiki article, too.) She had her 15 minutes of infamy back in the day, for sure.
 
Proof that people who try to legislate morals tend to achieve results that are the opposite of the intended.

The fist name that sprang to mind in this context was Anita Bryant. A long time ago, but to most people she just made a fool out of herself: Anita Bryant - Wikipedia. A certain congresswoman from Georgia seems to be cast from the same mold...

Yes, but the row over song lyrics Don's referring to in the 90s was championed by the then-wife of a liberal icon---Tipper Gore, wife of then-Senator and soon to be Vice-President Al Gore. Her campaign resulted in the label:

Unknown.png
 
Which is where the concept of profit margins come in. We're long past the days of swimming in ad revenue, even in the most popular 25-54 demos. So, when you say "LESS MONEY", the question any broadcaster has to ask is "will it be ENOUGH money?" (to pay the costs and return a given profit).

And, as always, the pearl of wisdom I got early on in my career---No one goes into broadcast ownership or management to make "a little" money.
I believe it is called "GREED."
 
Only in smaller markets and with local direct accounts where the management wants older customers or where the owner is a listener. The problem is that most of those local direct accounts have disappeared due to the Internet, big box stores and the current difficult inflation and economy for seniors.
MONEY is the root of all evil..........
 
I believe it is called "GREED."

Guess it depends. Gene Autry had the highest-billing radio station in America in 1979---KMPC, Los Angeles. $14 million in advertising (about $66 million adjusted for inflation). He employed just under 300 people. So, was he greedy or was he helping all those people feed, clothe, house and educate their families in addition to providing news, entertainment, traffic and sports to the community his station served?

Is the guy who took in less money and could only afford a skeleton staff somehow better?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom