Prais said:gr8 said,"get some investors together, buy a station and knock yourself out. Don't expect someone else to invest millions to cater to you and an individual."
Exactly.
<Bugs>
Heh. They don't know me very well, do they?
</Bugs>
Prais said:gr8 said,"get some investors together, buy a station and knock yourself out. Don't expect someone else to invest millions to cater to you and an individual."
Exactly.
SoulCrusher said:The music that plays on Top 40 stations couldn't be further away from what an adult wants to hear. Start with the exclusion of pretty much all music from before, say, 2004 or so. Go on to song titles that evoke pure juvenilia ("Imma Be", "Shake That Bubble", "Sexy Chick", etc.). Let's not forget the high percentage of acts that rely on pitch correction or vocoder to put their voices in tune - also not something that many adults want to hear. Finally, all you have to do is listen to a song from one of the following acts: Ke$ha, Miley Cyrus, Boys Like Girls, Cobra Starship, Britney Spears, etc.: All are music for children, with absolutely zero appeal to adults. And I'll say it again: We have seven stations that these descriptions apply to completely. You don't think broadcasters are going after children? Think again.
sethjamz said:Right on HubCity, well said!!! I rest my case.
SoulCrusher said:sethjamz said:The younger audience does not have the "spending power" that a more mature crowd does. Thats why these owners do what they do.
Hubcity said it...itunes, mp3 players etc give the younger audiences what they want, so why program a station to compete with the fact that the younger demos have to many choices and can't stay focused on radio because they are too busy with hooking up, video games, partying, watching stupid reality shows etc. I don't know many owner groups who buy stations to air what they think the "kids" want, they air programming that some consultant says will make them money, and with times like these, can they really afford not too?
They (owners) are catering to who pays their bills right now. It's truley business, the bottom line, MONEY!
Come again? Take a listen to one of the myriad Top 40 stations that we have around here. I know this doesn't go for everyone, but I took the time to count every Top 40 station that puts a decent signal into Southern Ocean County - the number I came up with was seven, loud and clear (WJLK, WAYV, WRDW, WZBZ, WIOQ, WSJO, WBBO - and before anyone questions some of my inclusions, I'll point out that Hot AC is now a slightly more adult-leaning CHR).
The music that plays on Top 40 stations couldn't be further away from what an adult wants to hear. Start with the exclusion of pretty much all music from before, say, 2004 or so. Go on to song titles that evoke pure juvenilia ("Imma Be", "Shake That Bubble", "Sexy Chick", etc.). Let's not forget the high percentage of acts that rely on pitch correction or vocoder to put their voices in tune - also not something that many adults want to hear. Finally, all you have to do is listen to a song from one of the following acts: Ke$ha, Miley Cyrus, Boys Like Girls, Cobra Starship, Britney Spears, etc.: All are music for children, with absolutely zero appeal to adults. And I'll say it again: We have seven stations that these descriptions apply to completely. You don't think broadcasters are going after children? Think again.
I grew up listening to radio. I continued to listen, until last year when the only station that appealed to me changed formats to sound more like everything else on the radio. I guess I'm one of the people that broadcasters just don't care about anymore. There is no reason at all why our area must have 7 CHRs and 6 Soft Rock stations (WOBM, WFPG, WBHX, WJRZ, WBEB, WWZY). Between these two female-oriented formats dominating the FM airwaves, what is left for the male listener? Maybe we're not all into the safe, bland classic rock-dominated Greater Greedia stations. Heck, regardless of what your age or gender is, if you don't like soft rock or hit music, you have very few choices.
I have an MP3 player. I listen to online radio, but that's mostly because there's not even one FM station that I find even slightly appealing. If there was, believe me, I would listen. There's a lot you can get from FM radio that you can't get from MP3s or online radio - news, traffic and weather, concerts, information on local events, to name a few things. But I'm certainly not going to listen to shallow, childish drivel or sleep-inducing soft music for that. I'm an alternative rock fan first and foremost, but if there's anything different out there, I will support it. Blaming technology is just a copout that broadcasters like to use to cover up their ineptitude.
The broadcasters around here are a lot like politicians. Instead of accepting the blame for any shortcomings on their end, they take it out on the people. If you really have your heart in making a format that you believe in a success, it's up to you to make it happen. Press Communications clearly didn't have their heart in G Rock, and that's why they dropped it so abruptly without even making it an online station. Top 40 is obviously more their cup of tea, because they're actually trying to make it work. My hope is that one day we'll get someone who will do that for an alternative rock station - or anything that isn't Top 40, Soft Rock, Classic Rock or Country, for that matter.
SoulCrusher said:sethjamz said:The younger audience does not have the "spending power" that a more mature crowd does. Thats why these owners do what they do.
Hubcity said it...itunes, mp3 players etc give the younger audiences what they want, so why program a station to compete with the fact that the younger demos have to many choices and can't stay focused on radio because they are too busy with hooking up, video games, partying, watching stupid reality shows etc. I don't know many owner groups who buy stations to air what they think the "kids" want, they air programming that some consultant says will make them money, and with times like these, can they really afford not too?
They (owners) are catering to who pays their bills right now. It's truley business, the bottom line, MONEY!
Come again? Take a listen to one of the myriad Top 40 stations that we have around here. I know this doesn't go for everyone, but I took the time to count every Top 40 station that puts a decent signal into Southern Ocean County - the number I came up with was seven, loud and clear (WJLK, WAYV, WRDW, WZBZ, WIOQ, WSJO, WBBO - and before anyone questions some of my inclusions, I'll point out that Hot AC is now a slightly more adult-leaning CHR)....
Up_N_Down_The_Dial said:although you can hear all of those stations where you live, they don't all compete with each other.... WJLK and WBBO are in the same market (although they are Class A's that might not cover the whole market). WAYV, WZBZ, and WSJO are in the same market (and 'AYV and 'ZBZ are owned by the same guy)... and WRDW and WIOQ are in the same market... so when you break it down like that it's not as bad... but again... I get your point, but from the owners point of view, WAYV is NOT competing with WBBO... even though their signals are very close to each other...
Nick said:Silkie, are you talking about Chunky on NOW?
hubcity said:Radio is a business.
Businesses do what their executives think they have to do to (a.) stay in business and (b.) be successful at being in business. If that involves jettisoning one audience in the hope of attracting another, so be it.
If that tactic succeeds, so be it. If it fails, so be it. The business will not admit fault in either case.
Business is, by definition, sociopathic, not to mention deluded by its perceived grandeur.
(Don't depend on sociopaths. They tend to let you down.)
Prais said:Silkie is trying to turn this place into "Masterpiece Theatre."
DX said:I know you're talking about music on FM, but I find it interesting that no one has mentioned New Jersey 101.5, one of the most interesting "talk" stations in the country!