As mentioned above, WRKO ran "Sounds Of Sinatra" and a paid travel show in the 80's when owned by General Tire and Rubber Company,Inc.
Ummm...so what? Syndicated niche programming was invented to fill weekend programming time on talk stations when the available audience wasn't large enough to justify more expensive programming. The only departures from this seem to be local sports and Saturday AMD, which is often included in the weekday AMD rotation. Considering the demos of talk stations, the Sounds of Sinatra seems a pretty reasonable programming choice, plus it's a pretty interesting show for folks of a certain age and musical tastes. Since the news cycle is pretty much Mon-Fri, Sid Mark was hardly a downgrade from flogging 3 day old dead horses. I assume you know that Sounds of Sinatra isn't paid programming but a straight-up syndicated show, so why group it with paid programming?
It was stupid programming then for an "ALL TALK STATION" and such diversions whether on WRKO or WBZ corrupt the format.
Why?
Again, if the money were flowing from national or spot ads this would not be necessary.
Curiously, in the media where they are possible, infomercials are least evident in the advertising medium in which revenue is down the most, broadcast network and spot television, and most numerous on the electronic advertising medium which is up the most, cable television. Radio is down, so far, in 2007, and paid programming doesn't seem any more prevalent than it did during the years when radio revenue was growing.
Radio's problem, which has been around forever, is that it is the most price-sensitive of all media, and thus vulnerable to whatever is the 'new' media of the day. It started when UHF television schedules were cost competitive with radio, and then with bargain basement cable deals. The newest kid on the block, internet advertising, appears to be eating everyone's lunch, not just radio. If you want to stay in business, you sell advertising...either spot, sponsorship, or long-form. Damning a medium which is around to sell advertising for selling advertising is like calling a butcher a prostitute for selling three grades of hamburger. What is the point?
Just what is your theory based on? As usual, the answer appears to be nothing.
Even Red Sox, Bruins, Celtics and the cheating Patriots can be defended as a means of building a broader audience
Actually, sports hasn't needed defending for any reason, but has been a mainstay of broadcasting for around 90 years. They run because they make money. But, if your definition of prostitution is running a program outside of the format for the purpose of revenue generation, and since most stations running sports are not sports stations, it would seem that running the Bruins on a news/talker vice running a paid travel program on one is a distinction without a philosophical difference.
informercials are a turn off, drive listeners away and do nothing to build the base.
If that was the case, they wouldn't be around, because the people that produce them and buy the time expect to make money. If nobody watched or listened, they wouldn't. And the ones that nobody watched or listened to are gone. Just what about this do you find hard to understand? Think about it the next time you're seaching for a DeLorean new car dealership.
Obviously, you were never in programming and reflect the accepted prostitution of the format by turning tricks as a means of making a quick and dirty buck. Call it anything you want, but it is still prostitution.
The low point of Boston talk radio was probably the Jerry Williams Sex Surveys, which was just blatant pandering to the purient interests of the listeners, making them probably the greatest demonstrable case of real air time prostitution in memory. Those bogus 'surveys' make the Magic Bullet infomercials seem like Firing Line in comparison.
Regards,
TSB