• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

A very useful tool for MW DX'ers

I'm sure most of you already have seen it, but http://radio-timetraveller.blogspot.com/ has a fantastic U.S. (not Canada) pattern map. I use it every day.

It's in the upper right corner of his blog and is listed as "Pattern Maps 540 - 1700 KHz". Shows all the AM station patterns by frequency, in Google Maps.

It must have been quite time consuming, and I thank R-TT for doing it.
 
Tincap said:
The actual link, for the map is here ~> https://www.box.com/s/o52qw1who7ffifm8xkl5 (The blog link now opens to a newer article).

I could see being useful, but only on a limited scale...as I like to cast a wider net. :)

~BG

You're just upset by the dearth of patterns from that cold country up north. :)

Off the topic, but I've driven north to the United States border with what should be Canada many times, however when I look over to where Canada should be, all I see are bits and bytes. ???
 
hey somebody look at 660kHz and explain to me the WLOY/WLFJ situation in North Carolina?
 
Hi Guys,

Saw some unusual download activity on these maps and it looks like this is the source of interest. Glad these maps are useful to you.

They are created from the current FCC database, US stations only, as much of the Canada and Mexico (and others) data is out of date or inaccurate. I could easily include it, but many Canadian and Mexican stations have multiple and redundant entries. Weeding out the actual correct ones, if there are even correct ones, is nearly impossible.

The patterns are indeed based on station's power, array directivity, ground conductivity and earth dielectric constant for a groundwave situation. But be sure to note that they are groundwave or daytime representations and NOT skywave (nighttime) representations. The actual distant skywave pattern calculation and expected received signal levels at distant points for nighttime service are way beyond my mathematical abilities. The patterns presented, however, do show approximate groundwave signal levels for each station's service (daytime, nighttime, critical hours), the stated soil conductivity, and provide a comparable and portable reference which I can easily update.

At the moment, they are all based on a flat conductivity of 6 millisiemens/meter all across the country. I am in the process of interpreting the FCC's M3 ground conductivity database and writing code to show a more accurate representation according to actual local ground conditions. The code is very complicated and will ultimately generate virtually millions of calculations to arrive at the final patterns.

The Google Map also has the ability to trace a ray from your location to each station to aid in showing you where you fall in the station's pattern.

As stated in the original article, be careful about posting direct links to the downloadable pattern reference .zip. The link will change each time I post a new set of maps as it is delivered by my storage host box.com. Visit the main page of the blog instead. At the top right corner of the blog is a section called Latest US Mediumwave Files. That link is the only link and will be current.

robotique asked about the 660kHz WLOY/WLFJ situation in North Carolina. The pattern interference is mostly due to the overstated ground conductivity of 6 mS/m. Ground conductivity in that area generally ranges 1-4 which would reduce signal range considerably.

Best DX,

Bill
RADIO-TIMETRAVELLER
 
It's kind of hard to use. It makes Class Ds look like Class Bs. And I'd rather see inverse fields than some attempt at groundwave service area (6 mS/m, 0.15 mV/m). Skywaves are usually what you hear on real DX, and that is calculated by inverse field, not groundwave distances. Maybe a toggle for more choices like this.

Other than that, I know that this is a difficult task and it is interesting, and I respect the effort.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom