• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

A Visit to Fry's in Dallas

The last time I visited Fry's in Dallas, they disavowed any knowledge of HD radio. One manager told me "You must be mistaken. HD is a TV set." Things have changed quite a bit in the last couple of months. Yesterday, they had a nice end cap display of working HD radios. There was even some signage describing the alternate channels on various area stations. The listing was out of date, as many of the stations had changed formats, but it was a start.

Out of the three radios on display, one was not HD capable. I thought that was odd, but consider where we were, and it shouldn’t be a surprise. There was the BA Receptor, the Sangean HDR-1 and another Boston Acoustics radio that included a CD player, which was reminiscent of the Bose Wave radio. Unfortunately, it did not seem to be HD, but it was a nice little radio.

Just as advertised, the BA Receptor was deaf as a post. My friend and I managed to get it to pick up one analog station with the included antenna, but that was after messing with its placement for some time. Neither of us could get any HD reception it in the store. It was similarly deaf on AM, although a GE Super Radio that was on the shelf nearby gave satisfactory performance on both AM and FM. I'd give the BA thumbs down, just as has been reported ad nauseum.

Next…

The Sangean HDR-1 was a horse of a different color. Using a built in whip antenna, it was a good performer in analog and seemed to do well in HD. Classical music station WRR was a real stand out in HD. Even in the noisy store environment, it was amazing how quiet passages were. Even though it is a table radio, it had a pleasing tonal balance, and I thought it was an attractive piece of equipment. I couldn't get any HD reception on AM, but I suspect that would be hard to do in a place with as many interference generators as Fry's. (Although the GE wasn't all that bad on strong AM stations.)

What I did not like about the Sangean was the "one knob does all" control. It's probably just me, but I never figured out what was wrong with two knobs, "on-off-volume" and "tuning." I thought it made it a bit awkward, but I'm sure you'd get used to it. There is supposed to be a remote control for the radio, but it was missing. Maybe it is easy to use. It was priced at $199 with a $25 rebate. If you live in an area with a lot of HD stations, this might be worth it. It is a nice radio, even in analog.

There was also a Sangean component HD tuner, the HDT-1. It is intended for home stereo applications. As I recall, somebody mentioned the lack of such a device on the market. Well, it is here now. Naturally, the one at Fry's wasn't connected up to anything, so you could hear it. It did have power, so you could at least see how the controls worked. It looked like a competent piece of equipment, which with the use of a rack shelf would be right at home in a radio studio for off air monitoring. It was also $199 less a $25 rebate.

I’d say quite a bit of progress has been made. There are a lot of HD stations in Dallas, but it is a top 10 market. If it isn’t going to happen there, it certainly won’t play in Paducah.


Lest you think I've sold out to the Dark Side, I must also mention that there was a similar end cap display for, guess what......


Scroll down.....





More......






Are you ready?










Wireless Internet Radios.

Yep they were there, and one was working. Both were from Roku. The display occupied exactly the same amount of floor space as the HD radio display. One of the Wi-Fi radios was the "Soundbridge," which is a tubular plastic affair with a blue digital display. It looks a lot like a digital clock for your bedroom. Fry's wanted $199.00 for it, but I notice on Roku's web site, you can get it right now for $99.00. Not bad. The other is simply called "The Soundbridge Radio" which was $349.00 at Fry’s. It was actually working, and sounded very good. I was impressed.

I may have to try the Soundbridge for a hundred bucks, since there are no HD signals to listen to in my neighborhood, although I understand that one local broadcaster (Waller) has purchased HD transmitters for two of their FM stations.

If nothing else, it was an interesting field trip. With FMExtra reportedly coming on line, more and cheaper Wi-Fi radios coming, and who knows what else on the horizon, I predict that things will not be boring. Even though these are not strictly “HD” radios, I think they are appropriate to discuss on this forum, at least until the Moderator fires up the FMExtra and Wi-Fi radio forums. The technology is similar and interrelated. I still think that software defined radios are our future. I doubt very highly that there will be only one winner, unless there are some corporate suicides along the way.
 
Chuck wrote: "...Things have changed (at Fry's Electronics) quite a bit in the last couple of months. Yesterday, they had a nice end cap display of working HD radios..." and "...there was a similar end cap display for, guess what......Are you ready?.......Wireless Internet Radios...."

Wow. Looks like iBiquity, with the advertising backing of the HD Radio Alliance ($200 million in 2006 and $250 million in 2007), has had some success lately. Good for them. And you were even able to pick up some stations in HD. Cool.

As for that wireless Internet radio display, looks like the Wireless Internet Radio Alliance (which does not exist, and therefore has no advertising or promotional budget) lucked out by getting a similar-sized display. Tell me Chuck, how was the reception on that connected Soundbridge? How many stations could that thing pick up from the store's RF riddled location? Thanks for the special price tip! And I noticed that $99 price is good through the end of the month - no rebate involved. Maybe I should buy a second one!
 
Chuck said:
Wireless Internet Radios... Yep they were there, and one was working. Both were from Roku. The display occupied exactly the same amount of floor space as the HD radio display. One of the Wi-Fi radios was the "Soundbridge," which is a tubular plastic affair with a blue digital display. It looks a lot like a digital clock for your bedroom. Fry's wanted $199.00 for it, but I notice on Roku's web site, you can get it right now for $99.00. Not bad. The other is simply called "The Soundbridge Radio" which was $349.00 at Fry’s. It was actually working, and sounded very good. I was impressed.

More on the WiFi front... Possible "Cartel member" change of pace in Allentown, PA?

"Valley radio station offers online oldies... WAEB-AM 790 this morning launched an Internet radio station that will play oldies music 24 hours a day. Station Market Manager Richard Lewis made the announcement about 9 o’clock on the Bobby “Gunther” Walsh show on the Lehigh Valley talk-radio station. The station’s Mike Mittman said the free streaming audio is in “crystal-clear digital stereo” of better quality than a CD. Some of the songs listeners will hear -- from the 1950s, ‘60s and ‘70s -- never were released in stereo before, Mittman said. Clear Channel Broadcasting Inc. owns WAEB."

http://www.waeb.com/pages/oldiesstream.html

The Clear Channel AM News-Talk station has been “stunting” for a few weeks—inferring that “Oldies” would be returning to 790AM... They DID—on that station’s WEBSITE as an internet-only service. Oldies disappeared from that local market last fall. WAEB was a heritage Top-40 station. The format was not added to any of CC’s HD-FM services in the Lehigh Valley, PA market.

Here’s some good background that may illuminate some of CC’s less-than-forthright “strategy” regarding this endeavor. There is a strong indication that Clear Channel may be “covering its bet” by venturing into net-only formats aimed at the WiFi, mobile internet-capable, and cell-phone reception market. From the Reading/Lehigh Valley board here at R-I:

http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index.php/topic,61385.msg431822.html#msg431822

What is interesting here is the increased COMMITMENT they have made to this service. The stream sounds MUCH BETTER than the typical over-the-net on-air streams offered by CC stations in the past. They allege some of the music product is represented by exclusive re-masters and sound enhancements designed to compliment the net format.

Now where could they be heading with this?
 
Hipporadio wrote: "...Now where could they (Clear Channel) be heading with this?..."

Into the future, my friend. Being stick owners, they are making the most of a tough situation. One thing's for sure. They won't have to sell any special radios (like with HD radio) in order to get an audience. Notice how they're not afraid to use the AM station to drive listeners to THEIR web station. We are in the middle of a major upheaval in radio - much bigger than some people think. There is plenty to worry about. There is also plenty of opportunity.
 
hipporadio said:
Chuck said:
Wireless Internet Radios... Yep they were there, and one was working. Both were from Roku. The display occupied exactly the same amount of floor space as the HD radio display. One of the Wi-Fi radios was the "Soundbridge," which is a tubular plastic affair with a blue digital display. It looks a lot like a digital clock for your bedroom. Fry's wanted $199.00 for it, but I notice on Roku's web site, you can get it right now for $99.00. Not bad. The other is simply called "The Soundbridge Radio" which was $349.00 at Fry’s. It was actually working, and sounded very good. I was impressed.

More on the WiFi front... Possible "Cartel member" change of pace in Allentown, PA?

"Valley radio station offers online oldies... WAEB-AM 790 this morning launched an Internet radio station that will play oldies music 24 hours a day. Station Market Manager Richard Lewis made the announcement about 9 o’clock on the Bobby “Gunther” Walsh show on the Lehigh Valley talk-radio station. The station’s Mike Mittman said the free streaming audio is in “crystal-clear digital stereo” of better quality than a CD. Some of the songs listeners will hear -- from the 1950s, ‘60s and ‘70s -- never were released in stereo before, Mittman said. Clear Channel Broadcasting Inc. owns WAEB."

http://www.waeb.com/pages/oldiesstream.html

The Clear Channel AM News-Talk station has been “stunting” for a few weeks—inferring that “Oldies” would be returning to 790AM... They DID—on that station’s WEBSITE as an internet-only service. Oldies disappeared from that local market last fall. WAEB was a heritage Top-40 station. The format was not added to any of CC’s HD-FM services in the Lehigh Valley, PA market.

Now where could they be heading with this?

I'm streaming the WAEB audio now from the laptop, through EQ, expander, and part 15 home-brew Van der Bijl modulator AM at 1550.
I add hammond spring reverb at 1967 level. This stream sounds really, really good.
I'm listening on a 1980's Sony Hi-Fi AM/FM table radio where the AM will reproduce 20khz.
And I know my xmit is good to same.
This stream does have fidelity equal to CD.
It did just stop...oops...Cingular dropped wirless and reconnected...very uncommon for my experience.
I hear no zizzlies or phase shifting.
You who have read my posts know how I criticize bad audio, and I can leave this on with no fatigue.
Cymbals sound like cymbals....someone is paying big for bandwidth for once.
Sounds like a feed off STL.

I didn't think we had Fry's in Chicago, but I just saw a newspaper insert.
They don't DO Chicago, they do suburbs.

Someone tell us the stream data rate for this thing..it's dropping out to 10% now, big pauses...
Thats the downside of sounding good, you have to move a lot of data...back now with audio WHOA huge time shift into
middle of next song. Which sounds great. Two edged sword, this digital delivery.
Sounds great when it works.
They just introd johnny b good by Mr Berry and I can discern clearly the original overmod byproducts in the opening, this is good.
As rebroadcast here at home, it reads just like a great AM station...
It's not quite as convincing if I turn my reverb off. Then I can almost hear that it MIGHT be digital.
I give it an A.
The 8 songs I've heard have been pretty well on the beaten path...but all sound transparent!
 
vsa said:
Tell me Chuck, how was the reception on that connected Soundbridge? How many stations could that thing pick up from the store's RF riddled location? Thanks for the special price tip! And I noticed that $99 price is good through the end of the month - no rebate involved. Maybe I should buy a second one!

I really couldn't tell you how many stations it could pick up. There are thousands of Internet radio stations. There were about a half dozen stored in the radios pre-sets. That's as far as I got, since there was a lot of other things to see. I assume you need the remote (or at least a little time) to assign streams to pre sets. The remote was missing, but that seems pretty standard at Fry’s. The streams I heard sounded quite good. It was certainly no worse than the Sangean HD radio, which I judged to be quite good. There was no static or drop out problems. This display was located very near a quarter acre of computer displays, all of which were up and running. I imagine there was a ton of Wi-Fi in the room. That did not seem to be a problem though.

Oh, by the way, I looked at the back of the radio. The Ethernet jack was not in use. Wherever the signal came from, it was done by wireless.

I thought the placement of the two displays was interesting too. The HD display was on a rear end cap of an aisle of standard table radios. From the front of the store, you’d have to walk to very rear of the store and turn around to notice it. The Roku display was on a main aisle, between the radio and audio section and the computer section. I’m no store designer, but I think it had a lot more visibility than the HD display. Coincidence? Maybe….
 
Tom Wells said:
This stream sounds really, really good... does have fidelity equal to CD... I hear no zizzlies or phase shifting. You who have read my posts know how I criticize bad audio, and I can leave this on with no fatigue. Cymbals sound like cymbals....someone is paying big for bandwidth for once.

Someone tell us the stream data rate for this thing - it's dropping out to 10% now, big pauses... Thats the downside of sounding good, you have to move a lot of data...I give it an A.

My observation (minus your “delicious” AM and Hammond reverb enhancement) is IDENTICAL. Shocking, but CC has managed to fire off a stream on the net that is up there with the very best I have heard in well-presented and processed Windows Media “Audio 8” at 128kbps.

Most interesting is my displayed stream rate on the Windows Media Player CC embeds into the HTML page display—the stream plays from Internet Explorer—NOT as a discrete launch of WMP. If the latter were the case, various “stream info” and diagnostics could be accessed to determine the true nature of the WAEB oldies stream. My displayed rate is 51kbps ??? First, the audio quality of this stream FAR EXCEEDS ANY I have heard from the available stereo Windows Media codecs at 48, 56, and even 64kbps... Where is this “51k” rate coming from? Maybe a glitch. I sure that “dynamic bandwidth detection” is involved here, but my Verizon DSL connection allows routine 128kbps audio and 360kbps video with nearly ZERO unrecoverable packets and a player-displayed stream quality monitor that rarely falls below “100-percent”.

Interesting, but nonetheless exceptional... This IS NOT the “garden variety” stream offered by CC to complement their on-air stations, and sounds BETTER than over-the-air HD! There’s much more lurking behind this offering. This is a test... And I’m not talking about an EBS test either ;)
 
Chuck observed: "....There were about a half dozen (stations) stored in the radios pre-sets.  That's as far as I got....The streams I heard sounded quite good.  It was certainly no worse than the Sangean HD radio, which I judged to be quite good. There was no static or drop out problems...I looked at the back of the radio. The Ethernet jack was not in use.  Wherever the signal came from, it was done by wireless...The HD display was on a rear end cap of an aisle of standard table radios. From the front of the store, you’d have to walk to very rear of the store and turn around to notice it.  The Roku display was on a main aisle, between the radio and audio section and the computer section.  I’m no store designer, but I think it had a lot more visibility than the HD display.  Coincidence?  Maybe…."

Thanks for the report, Chuck. Let's see. No reception problems, even inside the bowels of an RF riddled store. Thousands of stations available for free - no subscription required. Good audio quality. No dipole or rooftop antenna needed. Wired and Wi-Fi connectivity. Self-downloading software upgradability. Roku's technology also can be licensed by any manufacturer to incorpoarate this kind of radio into any kind of audio component. Hmmmm. Who'd possibly want something like this?

As for the display location, I'd put the blame on that notorious Wireless Digital Internet Radio Alliance and its multi-million dollar ad campaign. Are you deaf yet?  :)
 
Several years ago, some university was actually streaming UNCOMPRESSED 44.1khz digital audio over the internet. That's a bitrate of about 1.411 MEGABITS per second! How would you like to pay their streaming costs!

The problems with a stream like that are many. Even a nominal 5 or 6mbps internet connection will occasionally slow down during peak hours to the point that buffering will be an issue for even those of us with the best connections. And how many people could even listen simultaneously to such a stream? Two? Three? I wish I could remember which station it was, so I could check to see if they're still doing it (streaming uncompressed audio). Perhaps someone here knows.

The problem, of course, with wi-fi radio is that the "coverage area" of your "station" extends only as far as your network. And streaming packages for "smartphones" are still pretty steap. When/if they ever become affordable, I might just buy one. For now, I'll keep on listening to radio on the 'net with my Dell Axim X51v. Think of it as a POCKET internet radio.

One final things...internet radio and HD are not competitors. They're COMPANION services. The largest chunk of internet listening is to streaming audio from terrestrial stations. Web streaming is an augmentation of terrestrial radio, not a competitor (at least if stations use it properly). And it's no either/or situation. HD or internet? BOTH! Shortwave? THAT TOO! DRM? As soon as I can get my hands on a radio! Satellite? YES PLEASE! AM? Why of course! As someone pointed out, it's the PROGRAMMING. Anything which makes available programming I wouldn't otherwise get is welcome in my listening room. And anything which delivers programming that I already enjoy with increased fidelity is certainly a treat. HD AND internet radio do that. But given the choice between cd quality reproduction of music I don't care for, and noisy AM reception of a song that I LOVE, I'll take the latter every time.

I remember laughing my ass off to Wolfman Jack, and John Records Landecker on AM more than 35 years ago. I sure dont' remember whether the signal faded during a bit, or if it was noisy (probably YES to both!)
 
Chuck said:
Wireless Internet Radios.

Yep they were there, and one was working. Both were from Roku. The display occupied exactly the same amount of floor space as the HD radio display. One of the Wi-Fi radios was the "Soundbridge," which is a tubular plastic affair with a blue digital display. It looks a lot like a digital clock for your bedroom. Fry's wanted $199.00 for it, but I notice on Roku's web site, you can get it right now for $99.00. Not bad.

Keep in mind that the $99 price is for the discontinued M-500; and the units are refurbished, not new. The unit at Fry's is the M-1001 for $199....brand new and an upgrade from the M-500.
 
I don't think the wireless internet radios would be able to play a stream like this one from the oldies station... Unless you're a tech head who can dig out the actual url for the stream. Many large radio stations seem to do this, forcing streamers to use a proprietary interface. I don't see any of these stations changing... Which means they'll be left behind when/if wireless internet radio takes off. How many people will be cheesed off enough to return these radios when they find out they can't stream their favorite radio station? Or that they can't take them outside of the house or they stop working? This technology is awesome but a bit premature for 99% of America, IMHO.

I can think of no one else other than myself who'd go through the trouble to snoop/hack a stream's actual address out of the encapsulation. Then again I can think of no one else other than myself who'd put up a big dipole to get one or two HD stations on a tabletop radio.

FWIW, that oldies station wouldn't stream on my computer at all. It just pops up a window saying it will start momentarily, with one frame greyed out with the word "undefined" in it. Oops, glitch! (I tried in Opera and IE, so it ain't the browser.)

Hey, the stream works after all. Guess I wasn't patient enough - there's an 18 second start delay in the javascript, for a commercial I guess. According to the statistics screen it's using WMA 9.2 at 48 kbps. I'm on DSL so it should have given me a higher stream rate, if capable. Not that this BellSouth DSL is worth a crap, but I know it's usually good for 768kbps video most days. Either way, it's much better than the 48kbps streams offered by KOMY, which is what I am listening to at the moment (found it in another thread here.)

Oh well, at least my XM works - indoors and out. ;D No buffering, no glitchy feeds, no unsightly dipoles... Well, they're not unsightly to me, but I'm a radio nerd. And the feed on DirecTV is much higher quality than the one through an XM radio!

I wish there was a Fry's up in Memphis so I could see the display. There's quite a few HD stations on up there. None here, of course. I bet there never will be, either. Here in the MS delta region many stations are mom and pop still, and they don't cover much territory.
 
Zach said:
I don't think the wireless internet radios would be able to play a stream like this one from the oldies station... Unless you're a tech head who can dig out the actual url for the stream. Most radio stations seem to do this, forcing streamers to use a proprietary interface. I don't see any of these stations changing...

That’s an interesting observation and probably true, at least for now. Since I don't own an Internet capable radio as yet, I'd be curious to know how you "tune" the thing. Will it work with just a web address, or do you need the actual stream URL? I'd be interested in hearing the answer form someone who has the appropriate receiver.

You can use my station as a trial. Our home page has an imbedded Microsoft Windows Player, which usually launches on most computers when you go to www.kzqx.com . Alternately, the actual stream is at http://radio.rsrwireless.com:4012/listen.pls or just http://radio.rsrwireless.com:4012/


I'd be curious to know which (if any) work with these radios.
 
Mike Walker said:
The problem, of course, with wi-fi radio is that the "coverage area" of your "station" extends only as far as your network.

Gosh, won't WiMax, eventually take care of that ?

Mike Walker said:
One final things...internet radio and HD are not competitors. They're COMPANION services. The largest chunk of internet listening is to streaming audio from terrestrial stations. Web streaming is an augmentation of terrestrial radio, not a competitor (at least if stations use it properly). And it's no either/or situation. HD or internet? BOTH! Shortwave? THAT TOO! DRM?

They are not competitors. if streaming off the Web, but surely are, if you are talking portable Internet Radio through WiMax, versus HD Radio/IBOC, over the broadcast bands.
 
Zach said:
I don't think the wireless internet radios would be able to play a stream like this one from the oldies station [WAEB discussed earlier on this thread]... Many large radio stations seem to do this, forcing streamers to use a proprietary interface.... How many people will be cheesed off enough to return these radios when they find out they can't stream their favorite radio station? ...I can think of no one else other than myself who'd go through the trouble to snoop/hack a stream's actual address out of the encapsulation...

You shouldn’t have to “snoop” for a stream’s address as these products generally are guided by an online “directory service” maintained much like the music directory sites that provide track info for simplified CD ripping and mp3/tag creation... But there are a few current “hitches”...

You are correct that most large radio groups who choose to stream their stations have additional agendas beyond appreciating your TSL. They want you at their website, and who can guarantee that they would volunteer their stream addresses to these directory services if all they have to gain is your free consumption of their bandwidth?

Then let’s consider that “one-stop streaming solution” known as Live365—home to “ten-thousand” independent and non-corporate netcasters that you may actually prefer to listen to. Soon these “non-pro” stations will no longer be available from the iTines directory. Live365 wants you at their site also—and wishes to now charge you for choosing to avoid it. Thus, can you see them handing over their client and stream address list to the likes of Roku? Not likely—they seem to be gluing-together their own model. IF you wish to listen to their streams in a player-only mode or on a hardware wi-fi appliance—you have two options:

(1) The Live365 software-based internet radio “tuner” which would eliminate a trip to their website—but induces you into a nearly $5 per month (billed quarterly) membership which also permits non-commercial listening.

(2) Live365 streams may be accessed by only SELECT internet audio appliances sold thru their online store for approx $250—but again all require a membership and fee... And I do not see the Roku or Acoustic Energy (AE) brands listed on their site.

Speaking of Roku... Interesting technology—their ultimate desire is to license their internet audio capabilities to the consumer electronics industry. That mission has merit—as I can foresee the likes of Denon, Sony, and Yamaha having a more timely interest in these features than in lackluster HD radio.

I find the “internet tuner appliances” to be interesting and posed to ride a very nice wave, but I would not advise an early-adoption to the casual user. While some of these products offer a software “address digger”—consider that this application may be illegal—possibly violating the stream-owner’s copyrighted material. Furthermore, the “directory service” responsibilities still remain unclear and at times have been undependable. Recently, the site that pilots the popular AE wi-fi receiver just disappeared for a month—leaving the radio owners with a device that was “frozen in time” and could have potentially turned into a $300 brick... MY-OH-MY—that’s never happened in the computer biz before has it? ;)
 
Chuck wrote: "I'd be curious to know how you "tune" the thing. Will it work with just a web address, or do you need the actual stream URL?  I'd be interested in hearing the answer form someone who has the appropriate receiver. You can use my station as a trial.  Our home page has an imbedded Microsoft Windows Player, which usually launches on most computers when you go to www.kzqx.com .  Alternately, the actual stream is at http://radio.rsrwireless.com:4012/listen.pls  or just http://radio.rsrwireless.com:4012/"

I own a Roku Soundbridge M1001. There are two ways to tune in stations.

(1) You can access the M1001's 18 presets you'll see via a provided network address and page using any browser. Name each one how you like. Simply copy and paste any stream link and save it. Yours is "http://radio.rsrwireless.com:4012/listen.pls". The other link you gave does nothing.

(2) Fire up iTunes in "share mode" or a choice of windows media-player-servers on a networked computer. Using iTunes, for instance, you can tune in any mp3 stream and save as many as you'd like as a "Radio Favorite". You can access those, plus songs, playlists and podcasts on your M1001 with a provided remote control. About 100 station streams come pre-programmed.

The Soundbridge plays mp3 and wma streams and will be upgraded via a menu choice to stream other formats in the future. A Roku Radio Snooper software program is available for free to snoop out many hidden stream links/addresses.

KZQX's mono stream sounds superb here in Southern California!

It would be nice if HD radios could do all of this - and do it as well.

 
 
Mike Walker keeps repeating false information:
The largest chunk of internet listening is to streaming audio from terrestrial stations.
comscore media matrix and Arbitron report less then 20% of streaming audio is from
the online streams of AM and FM broadcast stations. The links to the studies have often been posted here, and yet you continue to post this false information.
Just as with iBiquity and the HD cartel, if you have anything the least bit worthwhile, it would not be necessary to habitually falsify.
 
vsa said:
I own a Roku Soundbridge M1001. There are two ways to tune in stations.

(1) You can access the M1001's 18 presets you'll see via a provided network address and page using any browser. Name each one how you like. Simply copy and paste any stream link and save it. Yours is "http://radio.rsrwireless.com:4012/listen.pls". The other link you gave does nothing.

It seems I was in error about the other link. Sorry....

vsa said:
The Soundbridge plays mp3 and wma streams and will be upgraded via a menu choice to stream other formats in the future. A Roku Radio Snooper software program is available for free to snoop out many hidden stream links/addresses.

KZQX's mono stream sounds superb here in Southern California!

It would be nice if HD radios could do all of this - and do it as well.

I can see that it would be an advantage to figure out how to make your stream name something easy to remember. Right now, that doesn’t seem to be easy to do, but I'm sure someone will figure out an elegant and simple solution. Of course, even the way it is now, once you figure it out, it is no big deal. We already do this all the time. When I want to watch NBC on my satellite TV, I have to dial in "8882." No big deal really, but like everything, Internet radio will have a bit of a learning curve.

It still amazes me how many people have figured it out, and our station appeals to an older demographic. You can teach old dogs new tricks.


Thanks for the info.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom