• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

ABC and the Academy Awards?

K

KML0224

Guest
Just how long has ABC been carrying the Academy Awards? Do they go back farther then 1992? I know it's been on ABC every year since that time, much like the Grammy Awards are always on CBS (going back to at least 1987, as far as I know).<P ID="signature">______________
The 2006 New York Yankees...on to title #27!</P>
 
All I know is if tonights show keeps going in the direction it started...patently unfunny whether your left OR right, Jon Stewart and David Letterman will have something more in common than hosting a late night talk show.

Its not hideous to this point...just dull...little or nothing is clicking.

RIP Johnny Carson AND your writers.

and somewhere Billy Crystals' Agents phone is ringing....
 
Presenter Jennifer Lopez either overdosed on the fake tanning solution or spent a few too many hours in a tanning bed. She was darker than Morgan Freeman and Samuel L Jackson.

And how about Dolly Parton?? She looked positively anorexic.

I did enjoy the opening montage of previous hosts saying "No" to hosting this year's show.

The rest of the show, as mentioned, is fairly dull. But a billion people around the world are all bored with us. ;o)
 
> Just how long has ABC been carrying the Academy Awards? Do
> they go back farther then 1992?

According to the Oscar.com website (jointly operated by ABC and the Academy), ABC has televised the show since 1976, and their current contract to do so runs through 2014.

The ceremony was first televised in 1953, by NBC, and they continued to do so through 1960. From 1961 through 1970, ABC handled the broadcast (including the first color telecast in 1966), and then the ceremony moved back to NBC from 1971 through 1975.

CBS has therefore never carried the Oscars. (Nor does it seem likely they will.)<P ID="signature">______________


</P>
 
> Presenter Jennifer Lopez either overdosed on the fake
> tanning solution or spent a few too many hours in a tanning
> bed. She was darker than Morgan Freeman and Samuel L
> Jackson.

She also looks terrible with her hair pulled back. Her look reminded me of a drag queen before the wig goes on.<P ID="signature">______________


</P>
 
ahh! the montages!

I didn't find anything in particular wrong with Jon Stewart...he was funny, but he seemed a wee bit out of his element.

Without a doubt, the excessive montages annoyed the hell out of me.
 
> The rest of the show, as mentioned, is fairly dull. But a
> billion people around the world are all bored with us. ;o)
>
There can be no way 1 billion people watch the Oscars. The total world poulation is about 6.5 billion. So that would mean on Oscar night more than 1 of every 6 people in the world would be tuned into the Oscars.

And of that 6.5 billion, 1 billion are in India and 1.3 billion are in China and slightly under 1 billion are in Africa.

One the web I found last year about 43 million people watched the Oscars. That is out of 290 million people total. While 43 is A LOT it is only 14.8% of the United States population.

The only thing I can think is 1 billion is 15% of 6.5 billion. So you'd have to assume the rest of the world's population is tuning in at the same ratio as the United States.<P ID="signature">______________
Once I figured out the meaning of life....Then I forgot to write it down.</P>
 
Re: ABC Bungling

I was quickly irritated by ABC's presentation of the Academy Awards. But then, I don't know how much of this is ABC and how much of it is the Academy production themselves. Among the more annoying -

1) Mike problems. Ironically during the audio editing award, the winners discovered the mike was off and they resorted to tapping on it before it came alive. This wasn't the first incident. It happened several times, especially in having the mike turned off in order to accomodate a transition to commercial.

2) Obnoxious trivia announcer. Highly robotized voice provided insight into award winner's background as they went up on stage. Someone went to Mr. Professional Announcer Voice School and took it way too seriously.

3) Rush rush to the end. In the closing 15 minutes, you almost went looking for the cattle prods to rush people on and off stage. It almost looked like Nicholson was running to the mike. Some of the final acceptance speeches were cut short because we had to hurry off to a L'Oreal ad.

4) I suspect this was more Bill Conti's doing, but I almost wanted to drop an IED into the orchestra pit with the overbearing music that seemed to accompany every acceptance speech. Someone take his baton away.

5) ABC looked, but never did find Annie Proulx (Brokeback Mountain author). We got a grand tour of Ang Lee's wife, Diana Ossana, but no Proulx despite being acknowledged by Ang Lee.

Some other notes -

- Miller Beer is now the beer for grownups? Okay then.
- I was not once inspired to rush out and buy a thing at JCPenney.
- Mastercard: Fill in this blank: ________ ptcy.
- Diet Coke: If you don't drink this, you are already too fat.
- L'Oreal: Makeup for foreigners.

Jon Stewart was obviously held back quite a bit, although the Stephen Colbert political faux ads were classic Daily Show. Did his audience give him a lukewarm reception or was it just the poor audience reaction miking?

What the hell happened to Dolly Parton? Oh... my.... God.

Most of the skits and padded bits added nothing to the show. Cut them and the self-congratulatory clipfests and just get this whole thing over with by 11. Biggest laugh out loud unintentional moment for me: in the "films deliver social messages for our own good" segment, they showed clips of the god-awful The Day After Tomorrow. If you want to show environmental disaster, go find The China Syndrome or something better than that piece of dreck.

"Films are meant to be seen on the big screen" according to Jake Gyllenhaal who barely got that out of his mouth. Yeah, except for the fact it costs $9 and Gabby Gail's cellphone keeps going off every five minutes.

In fact, for actors, I was surprised by the number of flubbed lines on the air. I would have thought they would have practiced a bit. I was happy to see Lauren Bacall still going, but I was terrified for her when she seemed to be losing her place. I wasn't sure if that was a teleprompter problem or if she was trying to wing it, and she evaporated once her film noir clip reel started.
 
Bungling in general

> 3) Rush rush to the end. In the closing 15 minutes, you
> almost went looking for the cattle prods to rush people on
> and off stage. It almost looked like Nicholson was running
> to the mike. Some of the final acceptance speeches were cut
> short because we had to hurry off to a L'Oreal ad.


I've noticed this for the past few years now. Why they continue to allow the choreographer to blather on for a few minutes and then cut off the director, I'll never know. Hell, once you pass the 11pm ET mark...who cares?

And was it just me, or was this the first time in years where you didn't have everyone with the movie on stage for the best picture? It looked quiet on stage...too quiet.


>
> 4) I suspect this was more Bill Conti's doing, but I almost
> wanted to drop an IED into the orchestra pit with the
> overbearing music that seemed to accompany every acceptance
> speech. Someone take his baton away.

I think it was an experiment so it wouldn't be so obvious when they were getting played off...then again, when its not obvious to us, it might not be obvious to the winners, which is why so many got played off...or just cut off.


> Jon Stewart was obviously held back quite a bit, although
> the Stephen Colbert political faux ads were classic Daily
> Show. Did his audience give him a lukewarm reception or was
> it just the poor audience reaction miking?

He said he wouldn't dive into politics too much. I liked what I saw. I've been a fan of Jon's (we're on a first name basis) for a while now. And since I'm an imaging guy, I want a copy of the sound editor lobbyist spot. Also, "For those of you keeping score at home, Martin Scorese, Zero Oscars...3-6 Mafia...one". And the quick jab about pulling down the giant Oscar to see if democracy will flourish in Hollywood.


>
> What the hell happened to Dolly Parton? Oh... my.... God.

She's 60...percent plastic.


>
> Most of the skits and padded bits added nothing to the show.
> Cut them and the self-congratulatory clipfests and just get
> this whole thing over with by 11. Biggest laugh out loud
> unintentional moment for me: in the "films deliver social
> messages for our own good" segment, they showed clips of the
> god-awful The Day After Tomorrow. If you want to show
> environmental disaster, go find The China Syndrome or
> something better than that piece of dreck.

Or cut to a live shot of Joan Rivers...or the blood stream of countless actors inside.

>
> "Films are meant to be seen on the big screen" according to
> Jake Gyllenhaal who barely got that out of his mouth. Yeah,
> except for the fact it costs $9 and Gabby Gail's cellphone
> keeps going off every five minutes.

I liked his little "I know that joke sucked" laugh when he was on stage when he said "You know you can't see these on TV, or much less...video DVD..."*crikets*

>
> In fact, for actors, I was surprised by the number of
> flubbed lines on the air. I would have thought they would
> have practiced a bit. I was happy to see Lauren Bacall
> still going, but I was terrified for her when she seemed to
> be losing her place. I wasn't sure if that was a
> teleprompter problem or if she was trying to wing it, and
> she evaporated once her film noir clip reel started.
>

That was hard to watch. She is 81, so she might not see as well as she used to, or she might not be able to follow along like she used to. And she didn't do it once or twice...but everytime the prompt scrolled. I'm going to chalk that up to old age.
 
> There can be no way 1 billion people watch the Oscars. The
> total world poulation is about 6.5 billion. So that would
> mean on Oscar night more than 1 of every 6 people in the
> world would be tuned into the Oscars.

Ummmm...I was kidding. It's called sarcasm.
 
Re: ahh! the montages!

> I didn't find anything in particular wrong with Jon
> Stewart...he was funny, but he seemed a wee bit out of his
> element.
>
> Without a doubt, the excessive montages annoyed the hell out
> of me.
>

truthfully, I enjoy the montages. It shows actual work..albeit thrown together can take some scenes out of context....but film montages spare me from having to sit through some lame-a** acceptance speech which usually turns into some political agenda.....

Best montage I've ever seen is the closing montage at the Great Movie Ride at DisneyWorld
 
How about a history of the tune in times?

Being a lifelong Eastern Time Zone resident, I find it amusing that with a 8:00p et tune in time for main telecast, it's broad daylight (basically) in Hollywood when the limos are making their dropoffs at the venue. So how about a history of the air times? And have the Oscars always been seen live on the left coast?

ixnay
 
Re: How about a history of the tune in times?

"The Academy Awards" air on tape delay in the Pacific Time Zone at 11 PM ET, 8 PM PT.<P ID="signature">______________
The 2006 New York Yankees...on to title #27!</P>
 
Re: How about a history of the tune in times?

> "The Academy Awards" air on tape delay in the Pacific Time
> Zone at 11 PM ET, 8 PM PT.
>

The ABC ads all said "8 Eastern/5 Pacific".

I have a TV guide from 1970 that has the Oscars airing at 10 Eastern/9 Central and lasting 2 hours. ("Midnight Cowboy" won best picture that year).
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom