• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

ABC's Zero Hour cancelled

J

Jul

Guest
@SitcomsOnline twitter page: BREAKING: ABC has pulled @ZeroHour_ABC effective next Thursday. No scheduled replacement just yet.
 
Julius May said:
@SitcomsOnline twitter page: BREAKING: ABC has pulled @ZeroHour_ABC effective next Thursday. No scheduled replacement just yet.

Another quick hook, since it only premiered on Valentine's Day.
 
Too bad, my wife and I had enjoyed the show, despite the rather wooden acting. Interesting storyline.

I presume the entire short season was already in the can, so perhaps ABC will burn off the remaining episodes somewhere.
 
Mediafrog+ said:
Too bad, my wife and I had enjoyed the show, despite the rather wooden acting. Interesting storyline.

I presume the entire short season was already in the can, so perhaps ABC will burn off the remaining episodes somewhere.

They might simply post them online and be done with them.
 
After watching the first episode I thought this show had a lot of potential. After watching the first 20 minutes of the second episode I was completely lost and stopped watching.
 
ansky212 said:
After watching the first episode I thought this show had a lot of potential. After watching the first 20 minutes of the second episode I was completely lost and stopped watching.

That's the same problem I had with Flash Forward. For me, it's hard to get involved with a show week after week when you know there isn't going to be any resolution by the end of that week's show. These types of ongoing storylines are better as a miniseries than they are a season-long weekly show.
 
WOW! That was quick indeed.

I never saw the show, but heard about it and it's really suprising considering the network that pulled the plug.

As much as a previous post talks about NBC's woes at least they have The Voice and Sunday Night Football that can still draw strong ratings for the future.

To me ABC and FOX have a lot if not the same issues that NBC has in that they have to compete with the CBS juggernaut, granted that

most TV critics will never held the Tiffany Network's programs in high regard as in The Walking Dead, but they still seem to somewhat know what their

audience wants.

Although granted the overall O-T-A audience declines year after year, you still need to be patient with a show.

That's really my one big complaint with how Network TV promotes itself:

1. They make a big deal about a new show hyping either a big star or big director's involvment, etc.
2. Hype it like crazy until premiere.
3. Wait until the ratings.
4. Then depending on whatever a TV executive feels like it, decides to pull the plug in either 2 weeks, 2 months or 2 years, but less attention to the show becomes noticeable when it dosen't deliver in the ratings.

I guess now TV is a wasteland, but I guess it took us half a century to see that too much options, in my opinion, is a bad thing.
 
Here's a no-brainer: Bring back "Wipeout", and its very popular big balls. This should make up for both shows that got canned: Last Resort & Zero Hour.
 
ansky212 said:
After watching the first episode I thought this show had a lot of potential. After watching the first 20 minutes of the second episode I was completely lost and stopped watching.

The $64 million question is....if you could notice that, why couldn't a bevy of highly-paid programming
executives whose JOB it is to notice stuff like that, not notice that?
 
Everybodys looking for the next Lost so too many of the new shows are a lot more convoluted than they need to be. Wonder why simple narratives like CSI, Castle, The Good Wife keep chugging along while that thing about the submarine and 666 Park Avenue and Zero Hour and now the new Red Widow go under? Because we hardly get to know the players before we get.....Lost.
 
These days, it takes more time to build a new show's popularity.

Were I a network programming chief, I would not yank a new show so quickly, unless:

(1) It's premiere was extremely low-rated (for an example, even fewer viewers than "Zero Hour" got), or,

(2) The show turns out to be so lousy that my network gets criticized for airing it (this was one reason why ABC yanked "Turn-On" in 1969 after one episode!).

"Zero Hour" probably should have had at least a few more weeks.
 
Joseph_Gallant said:
These days, it takes more time to build a new show's popularity.

Were I a network programming chief, I would not yank a new show so quickly, unless:

(1) It's premiere was extremely low-rated (for an example, even fewer viewers than "Zero Hour" got), or,
It obviously didn't help putting it in a "death slot" against a Top 5 show like "Big Bang Theory" during sweeps month.
 
Troy Goodwin said:
Here's a no-brainer: Bring back "Wipeout", and its very popular big balls. This should make up for both shows that got canned: Last Resort & Zero Hour.
One problem - ABC would only be able to bring back the reruns of Wipeout as the rights to the current shows belong to Turner Broadcasting & TruTV

As for Last Resort, that is one show that would've developed a cult following like NBC's The Revolution has so far & 24 on Fox did many moons ago if given half a chance. But alas ABC was to squeamish to see that :(

Cheers & 73 ;D
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom