Well said, as always, Blue Hen -
Here's some more fodder to consider: Just who is Walgreen's targeting in their TV spots? I'd say "older" people over the age of 50 ... that's why the AARP is so pre-dominantly mentioned in the ads and why "price and value" are frequently mentioned when it comes to the cost of medicines or other items that Walgreen's shows that it is a "better buy" for older people. AARP, incidentally, is available for those 50+ ... not merely "geriatrics" for those unknowing.
Next, it comes back to the changing demos of those operating radio stations and, in particular, selling advertising or placing it. It's not just about "older, non-sellable demos," despite what some have vigorously defended here and on other boards ad nauseum.
The fact is, how many 23-year-old station sales reps or agency buyers do you know who relate to this format ... let alone to the demos it "perceives" as mostly worthless? There are a lot of them. Too many don't know the audience, thinking it's more like their parents, who they've tried for years in eagerness to get away from. A "mom and dad" format as we like is the last thing on the Hit Parade, if you will.
Buyers are just as bad or even worse. They are conditioned by the car manufacturers, especially, to be buying what we, the audience perceives everyone on the planet to be ...young, up-scale, sexy, attractive, skinny, near-model like and very very successful.
Yeah, that's what young people are, the ad buyers think. That's why an ad featuring a 20-something who looks like she just walked off a fashion show runway pushing Mercury cars is an absolute turn-off to me. Mercury may be an "older demo" image ... and should, then, sell to an "older demo" audience. But nobody wants to be considered "old."
Guess what, grandma? It's a shame you're being ignored by those who want you to be young, think young ... because they don't care. They want the younger audience ... that elusive "new" generation. Shame.
Next, it is NOT about being a pre-World War II generation that loves "Standards." OK. I lied. To those who love Sinatra on 78 rpm from his early World War II days, as well as the Duke Ellington, Artie Show, Glen Miller era ... maybe so. But there was a whole lot of great "Standards" music and "MOR" music that came out long after the 50s.
The Swingin' Sinatra (in stereo.) Perry Como, Steve & Eydie, Al Martino, Tom Jones, Engelbert, Rosemary Clooney, Herb Alpert, Sergio Mendes & Brazil '66 ... and on and on and on and on. We've discussed that here before.
Great music that newer, "hipper" more "younger targeted" GM's and programmers long ago forot. Shame.
Then there are those in programming who forgot that it's not just what's in the Joel Whitburn books or the Billboard and R&R charts that counts. Never once in 38 years have I ever heard a listener on the request line say, "Hey, why are you playing that Andy Williams or Tony Bennett record? It was a stiff and never made it on the Billboard charts."
Same with the Percy Faith, Ray Conniff or hundreds of other great artists who were a staple of "then" popular "Standards" or "MOR" radio as much as 25 or 30 years ago (with an audience now 45+ or older.)
We also forgot a whole slew of then "Adult Contemporary" music that must be very carefully programmed into this and with this format to make it work ... it has to be carefully done or it becomes a trainwreck. It takes work to do correctly.
Yet, people keep buying this music and makes it a huge hit...all the while, radio banishes it to the basement of radio stations all over the country.
Why?
Because the people doing it can't rely on Billboard or R&R as they can with an oldies format to program "Standards." They've got to have heart, passion and a love for the music ... just like mom and dad had. You can't "assume" a feeling for it based solely on "research."
This feeling, lovingly done, can be a winner. Ask KEZW in Denver, the former WPEN in Philadelphia and the new WHAT in the same city. Ask KAAM (whether the nay-sayers say it's bad or not ... for some people, it works, apparently.) Ask any of the 325 other stations programming live or (sadly) through its satellite incarnations on Dial Global, ABC, MOYL, Waitt or Jones/TM (and others.)
A format that works in Sarasota isn't necessarily going to work the same way in Spokane. It may work in Vero Beach, but not necessarily Visalia, CA. It's got to be promoted to and for a very loyal, active, upscale community who thirsts for what and who they are ... not what the time buyers and media "experts" say.
It's about local, direct ... not national spot buys.
But yes, it works. And can work very very well.
Like anything, though, it must be compelling, well done, well executed and loved. Not just a few Streisand and Jack Jones CDs. Not 94 cuts deep into the Nat King Cole library and certainly with the class and knowledge needed in presenting great artists like Ella, Sarah, Dean, Sammy and the rest ... with a strong look at the contemporaries of today ... Michael Buble', Diana Krall, Steve Tyrell and many more in a mix of exciting presentations all day and all night.
I love this format and I'm doing what I can not to be all things to all people. I'd rather have 1,000 of these listeners who respond in a big way to my advertisers than have 100 of the listeners who buy who are into brand X radio that boasts an audience of 35,000.
It works and it can. Don't just join in the chase for the same 25-44 that a dozen stations in your market are going for. There's a whole unique niche of active, spending, demanding people out there who want the same amount of attention ... and you probably have the P1 to yourself once you show you firm loyalty to them that you ask from them. Maybe not everyone. But a lot of somebody's frequently ignored and not heard. Now's the time to listen to them, as well.