• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

AirTools 6200 digital microphone processor

When talking about DSP, I would agree with Cornelius that DSP generally allows you to do more than you could do in analog. Some things are much easier to do in DSP. A few others perhaps not (clipping being an example).

The number of controls in today's digital processors suggests that they are much more flexible and that they offer you much potential. But, as users find out, that might not be so. I'm talking very general here. DSP processors are not better per se, it will always depend on the particular design and how intuitive and useful are the controls that are available.

And there are as much differences in designs in DSP as they are in analog. Perhaps even more...


Regards,
Goran Tomas
 
I started this post about a year ago, since then I bought a slew of Aphex
tubessence microphone processors....very easy set up...everyone loves them and they sound great.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom