H
Hunter
Guest
Difficult times.
Hunter said:Difficult times.
Only in the last 10 years or so has R&R lost its importance (since the development of websites like this). Prior to that, Radio and Records was the bible of the ENTIRE radio industry, no matter the size of market. Every executive, including CEO's of radio companies, air personalities and most others on the programming side of the station that I knew wanted to get their hands on it as soon as it came out. They would drop whatever they were doing and read it nearly from cover to cover. Radio and Records was the one and only true source of news about the radio industry for decades. If you don't understand that, you haven't lived radio. PERIOD.radi0active said:Doesn't it really just speak to the fact that nearly everything in the magazine could be found elsewhere, and for free? Unless you're really jonesing for some pictures of musicians with small market PDs, it didn't have much exclusive content. Maybe it was important in the 70s, but not today.
All it says to me is R&R got beat at the game they built. They didn't adapt to the electronic delivery of news, charts, ratings analysis, etc. fast enough or deep enough. I know they've been downsized in staff but they haven't been much of a news breaker as of late, either. Other sites, such as All Access, have been much friendlier and easier to contact in publishing rumors and providing constant news updates no matter the size of the market. They just got boring and were not providing content you could not find elsewhere as of late. There will be a sentimental loss or miss of what they provided but in reality, there are so many others out there, including this site, that are much more interesting and on the cutting edge vs. what they were offering.DavidEduardo said:Hunter said:Difficult times.
I remember collecting the 70's Radio and Records, and referring to them often as thought starters for promotions and such. The early conventions were fun, almost a club-like environment.
More than a sign of the times, it says something about what radio is today versus what it was in the 70's and 80's. There is a message there, although I am not sure what it is... and, of course, it says something about the sorry state of the music business, too.
Radio and Records also has a complete run of their own news magazine. They were begging for 70's and 80's issues a number of years ago and got them. Some of them were mine. I don't know what will become of them.briancraig said:David,
Do you still have those issues from the 1970s?
The old Tanner/Media General company here in Memphis would give me the back issues at the end of the year when I was still a teenager. I have almost a complete collection from 1982 to 1989 when Media General sold that division to TM Century in Dallas.
The only library I know of that has a complete run of Radio & Records is the Country Music Foundation Library in Nashville.
This is the signal of an important milestone for the industry...unfortuantely not a good one. While this seems to come as a shock, it cannot be unexpected, and your post sums up their situation. R&R was such a must read during the 70's - 90's....they strived to always be up to the minute with breaking news...especially for something delivered by mail....they didn't see the obvious advantages of the internet and now they are replaced by AllAccess. The radio industry....or rather the audio media industry needs to take notice. You no longer need a transmitter to effectively reach a target.4UH8SIMBKAGN said:All it says to me is R&R got beat at the game they built. They didn't adapt to the electronic delivery of news, charts, ratings analysis, etc. fast enough or deep enough. I know they've been downsized in staff but they haven't been much of a news breaker as of late, either. Other sites, such as All Access, have been much friendlier and easier to contact in publishing rumors and providing constant news updates no matter the size of the market. They just got boring and were not providing content you could not find elsewhere as of late. There will be a sentimental loss or miss of what they provided but in reality, there are so many others out there, including this site, that are much more interesting and on the cutting edge vs. what they were offering.