F
faridwontmind
Guest
What a book!
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
T
TheGenius
Guest
> What a book!
>
*LOL*
Yes,that all important SPRING book.
Meanwhile you blow out Brenda,KRock continues it's dismal performance,and X is on the way back up.
So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and JUST OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
Hey whatever gets you guys through the day man.
*LOL*
>
*LOL*
Yes,that all important SPRING book.
Meanwhile you blow out Brenda,KRock continues it's dismal performance,and X is on the way back up.
So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and JUST OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
Hey whatever gets you guys through the day man.
*LOL*
P
pedrothemexican
Guest
> > What a book!
> >
>
>
> *LOL*
> Yes,that all important SPRING book.
>
> Meanwhile you blow out Brenda,KRock continues it's dismal
> performance,and X is on the way back up.
> So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and JUST
> OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> Hey whatever gets you guys through the day man.
> *LOL*
>
TheGenius. Nice name. Shows what you know. They did not blow her out. She's had a higher calling (Top 25 Market to do mornings with Pete). She leaves in the best way possible but not before they have to write Kathy Rowe a new prescription.
> >
>
>
> *LOL*
> Yes,that all important SPRING book.
>
> Meanwhile you blow out Brenda,KRock continues it's dismal
> performance,and X is on the way back up.
> So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and JUST
> OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> Hey whatever gets you guys through the day man.
> *LOL*
>
TheGenius. Nice name. Shows what you know. They did not blow her out. She's had a higher calling (Top 25 Market to do mornings with Pete). She leaves in the best way possible but not before they have to write Kathy Rowe a new prescription.
H
hugofirst
Guest
> > What a book!
>
> > So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and JUST
> OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT down, SYR WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog sure likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
>
> > So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and JUST
> OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT down, SYR WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog sure likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
T
TheGenius
Guest
> > > What a book!
> >
> > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and
> JUST
> > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
>
> Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT down, SYR
> WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog sure
> likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
*LOL*
B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN from last spring.
When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH better than that!
>
> >
> > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and
> JUST
> > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
>
> Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT down, SYR
> WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog sure
> likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
*LOL*
B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN from last spring.
When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH better than that!
>
> > > What a book!
> >
> > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and
> JUST
> > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
>
> Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT down, SYR
> WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog sure
> likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
>
Hard to criticize B when they went "down" less than a half-point 12+ and they have nearly double the audience of the #2 station... oh by the way, NOW where's all that talk about extraps with 'SCP? They're flat the last 3 books... so if I were to extrap that, in 3 months they'll be... right where they are now!
Oh and what K-Rock did this book... that's what is commonly known as a "dead cat bounce"... or in this case perhaps a "dead Dog bounce"...
> >
> > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and
> JUST
> > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
>
> Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT down, SYR
> WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog sure
> likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
>
Hard to criticize B when they went "down" less than a half-point 12+ and they have nearly double the audience of the #2 station... oh by the way, NOW where's all that talk about extraps with 'SCP? They're flat the last 3 books... so if I were to extrap that, in 3 months they'll be... right where they are now!
Oh and what K-Rock did this book... that's what is commonly known as a "dead cat bounce"... or in this case perhaps a "dead Dog bounce"...
H
HauntingYou
Guest
Let us consider the obvious:
> > > > What a book!
> > >
> > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and
>
> > JUST
> > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> >
> > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT down,
> SYR
> > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog sure
>
> > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
>
> *LOL*
>
> B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN from last
> spring.
> When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH better
> than that!
> >
>
Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from having good sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but did not sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are not because of good programming.
B is number one? It is a bad station with no competition. WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no competition. They killed Power to give Hot more room, but the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot should have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after its disastrous experiment.
WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is back to being just a shell of its former self.
WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and Pete was obviously a mistake.
I could go on and on…
> > > > What a book!
> > >
> > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does OK...and
>
> > JUST
> > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> >
> > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT down,
> SYR
> > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog sure
>
> > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
>
> *LOL*
>
> B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN from last
> spring.
> When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH better
> than that!
> >
>
Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from having good sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but did not sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are not because of good programming.
B is number one? It is a bad station with no competition. WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no competition. They killed Power to give Hot more room, but the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot should have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after its disastrous experiment.
WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is back to being just a shell of its former self.
WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and Pete was obviously a mistake.
I could go on and on…
T
TheGenius
Guest
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
> > > > > What a book!
> > > >
> > > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does
> OK...and
> >
> > > JUST
> > > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> > >
> > > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT down,
> > SYR
> > > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog
> sure
> >
> > > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
> >
> > *LOL*
> >
> > B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN from
> last
> > spring.
> > When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH better
>
> > than that!
> > >
>
> >
>
> Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from having good
> sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but did not
> sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are not
> because of good programming.
>
> B is number one? It is a bad station with no competition.
> WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
>
> Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no
> competition. They killed Power to give Hot more room, but
> the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot should
> have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
>
> WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after its
> disastrous experiment.
>
> WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is back to
> being just a shell of its former self.
>
> WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and Pete
> was obviously a mistake.
>
> I could go on and on…
>
oh DO go on.
I love it when Ed's minions try to rationalize C.C.'s dominence.
Now CC BOUGHT into dominence,but no mention of SUSTAINING it.
Ed put his staions online,and they ALL still SUCK.*LOL*
Face it,you work for a loser,who has done nothing but LOSE,to Newcity,to Cox and now to C.C. *LOL
Man that has just GOT to suck.
> > > > > What a book!
> > > >
> > > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does
> OK...and
> >
> > > JUST
> > > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> > >
> > > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT down,
> > SYR
> > > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog
> sure
> >
> > > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
> >
> > *LOL*
> >
> > B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN from
> last
> > spring.
> > When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH better
>
> > than that!
> > >
>
> >
>
> Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from having good
> sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but did not
> sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are not
> because of good programming.
>
> B is number one? It is a bad station with no competition.
> WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
>
> Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no
> competition. They killed Power to give Hot more room, but
> the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot should
> have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
>
> WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after its
> disastrous experiment.
>
> WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is back to
> being just a shell of its former self.
>
> WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and Pete
> was obviously a mistake.
>
> I could go on and on…
>
oh DO go on.
I love it when Ed's minions try to rationalize C.C.'s dominence.
Now CC BOUGHT into dominence,but no mention of SUSTAINING it.
Ed put his staions online,and they ALL still SUCK.*LOL*
Face it,you work for a loser,who has done nothing but LOSE,to Newcity,to Cox and now to C.C. *LOL
Man that has just GOT to suck.
H
HauntingYou
Guest
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
> > > > > > What a book!
> > > > >
> > > > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does
> > OK...and
> > >
> > > > JUST
> > > > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> > > >
> > > > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT
> down,
> > > SYR
> > > > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog
> > sure
> > >
> > > > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
> > >
> > > *LOL*
> > >
> > > B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN from
> > last
> > > spring.
> > > When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH
> better
> >
> > > than that!
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from having
> good
> > sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but did not
> > sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are not
> > because of good programming.
> >
> > B is number one? It is a bad station with no competition.
>
> > WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
> >
> > Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no
> > competition. They killed Power to give Hot more room, but
>
> > the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot should
> > have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
> >
> > WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after its
> > disastrous experiment.
> >
> > WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is back to
>
> > being just a shell of its former self.
> >
> > WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and Pete
> > was obviously a mistake.
> >
> > I could go on and on…
> >
>
> oh DO go on.
> I love it when Ed's minions try to rationalize C.C.'s
> dominence.
> Now CC BOUGHT into dominence,but no mention of SUSTAINING
> it.
> Ed put his staions online,and they ALL still SUCK.*LOL*
> Face it,you work for a loser,who has done nothing but
> LOSE,to Newcity,to Cox and now to C.C. *LOL
> Man that has just GOT to suck.
>
Notice how "TheGenius" did not rebut what I said, because he knows it is true. When someone points out how poorly CC's stations are programmed, he does not argue the points being made. He merely attacks and insults Ed Levine. Is that all you have to offer?
Besides, I would hardly call TK a station that sucks. It seems to be doing quite well--one more reason to question the credibility and competence of "TheGenius."
Sustaining success with no competition is no reason to crow--no reason to crow at all.
> > > > > > What a book!
> > > > >
> > > > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does
> > OK...and
> > >
> > > > JUST
> > > > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> > > >
> > > > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT
> down,
> > > SYR
> > > > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the Dog
> > sure
> > >
> > > > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
> > >
> > > *LOL*
> > >
> > > B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN from
> > last
> > > spring.
> > > When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH
> better
> >
> > > than that!
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from having
> good
> > sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but did not
> > sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are not
> > because of good programming.
> >
> > B is number one? It is a bad station with no competition.
>
> > WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
> >
> > Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no
> > competition. They killed Power to give Hot more room, but
>
> > the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot should
> > have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
> >
> > WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after its
> > disastrous experiment.
> >
> > WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is back to
>
> > being just a shell of its former self.
> >
> > WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and Pete
> > was obviously a mistake.
> >
> > I could go on and on…
> >
>
> oh DO go on.
> I love it when Ed's minions try to rationalize C.C.'s
> dominence.
> Now CC BOUGHT into dominence,but no mention of SUSTAINING
> it.
> Ed put his staions online,and they ALL still SUCK.*LOL*
> Face it,you work for a loser,who has done nothing but
> LOSE,to Newcity,to Cox and now to C.C. *LOL
> Man that has just GOT to suck.
>
Notice how "TheGenius" did not rebut what I said, because he knows it is true. When someone points out how poorly CC's stations are programmed, he does not argue the points being made. He merely attacks and insults Ed Levine. Is that all you have to offer?
Besides, I would hardly call TK a station that sucks. It seems to be doing quite well--one more reason to question the credibility and competence of "TheGenius."
Sustaining success with no competition is no reason to crow--no reason to crow at all.
T
TheGenius
Guest
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
> > > > > > > What a book!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does
> > > OK...and
> > > >
> > > > > JUST
> > > > > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> > > > >
> > > > > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT
> > down,
> > > > SYR
> > > > > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the
> Dog
> > > sure
> > > >
> > > > > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
> > > >
> > > > *LOL*
> > > >
> > > > B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN
> from
> > > last
> > > > spring.
> > > > When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH
> > better
> > >
> > > > than that!
> > > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from having
> > good
> > > sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but did
> not
> > > sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are not
>
> > > because of good programming.
> > >
> > > B is number one? It is a bad station with no
> competition.
> >
> > > WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
> > >
> > > Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no
> > > competition. They killed Power to give Hot more room,
> but
> >
> > > the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot should
>
> > > have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
> > >
> > > WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after its
> > > disastrous experiment.
> > >
> > > WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is back
> to
> >
> > > being just a shell of its former self.
> > >
> > > WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and
> Pete
> > > was obviously a mistake.
> > >
> > > I could go on and on…
> > >
> >
> > oh DO go on.
> > I love it when Ed's minions try to rationalize C.C.'s
> > dominence.
> > Now CC BOUGHT into dominence,but no mention of SUSTAINING
> > it.
> > Ed put his staions online,and they ALL still SUCK.*LOL*
> > Face it,you work for a loser,who has done nothing but
> > LOSE,to Newcity,to Cox and now to C.C. *LOL
> > Man that has just GOT to suck.
> >
>
>
> Notice how "TheGenius" did not rebut what I said, because he
> knows it is true. When someone points out how poorly CC's
> stations are programmed, he does not argue the points being
> made. He merely attacks and insults Ed Levine. Is that all
> you have to offer?
>
> Besides, I would hardly call TK a station that sucks. It
> seems to be doing quite well--one more reason to question
> the credibility and competence of "TheGenius."
>
> Sustaining success with no competition is no reason to
> crow--no reason to crow at all.
I love how Ed's minions talk about how poorly CC stations are programmed. I think the listener disagrees,and son,it's the listener that matters,not some wannabe radio geek.If you are such an all knowing expert at programming,why aren't you doing it? If you know so much about programming a SUCCESSFUL station,why aren't you DOING it? Oh,I know,no one has discovered your true genius yet,but I'm sure it's just a matter of time right?
TK does "quite well". You must have a different definition of "quite well" than I do. But like I said,when you work for Galaxy mediocrity is celebrated as a huge success.Meanwhile we continue to beat you like the red headed stepchild that you are.
Dominating a market completely is absolute reason to crow,but son,you wouldn't know ANYTHING about any of that,now would you.
And you know what? You never will. Not as long as you work for ed.
>
> > > > > > > What a book!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does
> > > OK...and
> > > >
> > > > > JUST
> > > > > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> > > > >
> > > > > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT
> > down,
> > > > SYR
> > > > > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the
> Dog
> > > sure
> > > >
> > > > > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
> > > >
> > > > *LOL*
> > > >
> > > > B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN
> from
> > > last
> > > > spring.
> > > > When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH
> > better
> > >
> > > > than that!
> > > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from having
> > good
> > > sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but did
> not
> > > sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are not
>
> > > because of good programming.
> > >
> > > B is number one? It is a bad station with no
> competition.
> >
> > > WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
> > >
> > > Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no
> > > competition. They killed Power to give Hot more room,
> but
> >
> > > the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot should
>
> > > have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
> > >
> > > WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after its
> > > disastrous experiment.
> > >
> > > WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is back
> to
> >
> > > being just a shell of its former self.
> > >
> > > WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and
> Pete
> > > was obviously a mistake.
> > >
> > > I could go on and on…
> > >
> >
> > oh DO go on.
> > I love it when Ed's minions try to rationalize C.C.'s
> > dominence.
> > Now CC BOUGHT into dominence,but no mention of SUSTAINING
> > it.
> > Ed put his staions online,and they ALL still SUCK.*LOL*
> > Face it,you work for a loser,who has done nothing but
> > LOSE,to Newcity,to Cox and now to C.C. *LOL
> > Man that has just GOT to suck.
> >
>
>
> Notice how "TheGenius" did not rebut what I said, because he
> knows it is true. When someone points out how poorly CC's
> stations are programmed, he does not argue the points being
> made. He merely attacks and insults Ed Levine. Is that all
> you have to offer?
>
> Besides, I would hardly call TK a station that sucks. It
> seems to be doing quite well--one more reason to question
> the credibility and competence of "TheGenius."
>
> Sustaining success with no competition is no reason to
> crow--no reason to crow at all.
I love how Ed's minions talk about how poorly CC stations are programmed. I think the listener disagrees,and son,it's the listener that matters,not some wannabe radio geek.If you are such an all knowing expert at programming,why aren't you doing it? If you know so much about programming a SUCCESSFUL station,why aren't you DOING it? Oh,I know,no one has discovered your true genius yet,but I'm sure it's just a matter of time right?
TK does "quite well". You must have a different definition of "quite well" than I do. But like I said,when you work for Galaxy mediocrity is celebrated as a huge success.Meanwhile we continue to beat you like the red headed stepchild that you are.
Dominating a market completely is absolute reason to crow,but son,you wouldn't know ANYTHING about any of that,now would you.
And you know what? You never will. Not as long as you work for ed.
>
H
HauntingYou
Guest
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
> > > > > > > > What a book!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does
> > > > OK...and
> > > > >
> > > > > > JUST
> > > > > > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT
> > > down,
> > > > > SYR
> > > > > > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the
> > Dog
> > > > sure
> > > > >
> > > > > > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
> > > > >
> > > > > *LOL*
> > > > >
> > > > > B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN
> > from
> > > > last
> > > > > spring.
> > > > > When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH
> > > better
> > > >
> > > > > than that!
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from
> having
> > > good
> > > > sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but did
> > not
> > > > sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are
> not
> >
> > > > because of good programming.
> > > >
> > > > B is number one? It is a bad station with no
> > competition.
> > >
> > > > WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
> > > >
> > > > Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no
> > > > competition. They killed Power to give Hot more room,
>
> > but
> > >
> > > > the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot
> should
> >
> > > > have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
> > > >
> > > > WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after its
>
> > > > disastrous experiment.
> > > >
> > > > WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is
> back
> > to
> > >
> > > > being just a shell of its former self.
> > > >
> > > > WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and
> > Pete
> > > > was obviously a mistake.
> > > >
> > > > I could go on and on…
> > > >
> > >
> > > oh DO go on.
> > > I love it when Ed's minions try to rationalize C.C.'s
> > > dominence.
> > > Now CC BOUGHT into dominence,but no mention of
> SUSTAINING
> > > it.
> > > Ed put his staions online,and they ALL still SUCK.*LOL*
> > > Face it,you work for a loser,who has done nothing but
> > > LOSE,to Newcity,to Cox and now to C.C. *LOL
> > > Man that has just GOT to suck.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Notice how "TheGenius" did not rebut what I said, because
> he
> > knows it is true. When someone points out how poorly CC's
>
> > stations are programmed, he does not argue the points
> being
> > made. He merely attacks and insults Ed Levine. Is that
> all
> > you have to offer?
> >
> > Besides, I would hardly call TK a station that sucks. It
> > seems to be doing quite well--one more reason to question
> > the credibility and competence of "TheGenius."
> >
> > Sustaining success with no competition is no reason to
> > crow--no reason to crow at all.
>
> I love how Ed's minions talk about how poorly CC stations
> are programmed. I think the listener disagrees,and son,it's
> the listener that matters,not some wannabe radio geek.If you
> are such an all knowing expert at programming,why aren't you
> doing it? If you know so much about programming a SUCCESSFUL
> station,why aren't you DOING it? Oh,I know,no one has
> discovered your true genius yet,but I'm sure it's just a
> matter of time right?
> TK does "quite well". You must have a different definition
> of "quite well" than I do. But like I said,when you work for
> Galaxy mediocrity is celebrated as a huge success.Meanwhile
> we continue to beat you like the red headed stepchild that
> you are.
> Dominating a market completely is absolute reason to
> crow,but son,you wouldn't know ANYTHING about any of
> that,now would you.
> And you know what? You never will. Not as long as you work
> for ed.
> >
>
I was right on target with my last post, and, judging by the vitriol in your reply, I must have touched a nerve. I know you are trying to drawl me out by repeating ad nauseam that I work for Galaxy, in order to try and figure out who I am and where I work. I will not give you that satisfaction. Let it suffice to say that you are way off base as to my professional situation.
Actually, yes, TK does remarkably well, especially considering their signal situation.
You have no reason to crow, because you have accomplished nothing. You lucked into heritage stations with flamethrower sticks and no competition. One of "Ed's lackeys" could program these stations as well as they currently are being programmed. All they would have to do is "nothing," which is what always has been done, except for the periodic shuffling of personnel in order to diffuse blame and accountability. I can not wait for the day when someone takes a run at B and Hot with one of the relatively few decent signals that exist in this market. When it does happen, and it will, your silence will be deafening.
> > > > > > > > What a book!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station does
> > > > OK...and
> > > > >
> > > > > > JUST
> > > > > > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down, HOT
> > > down,
> > > > > SYR
> > > > > > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and the
> > Dog
> > > > sure
> > > > >
> > > > > > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom yet?
> > > > >
> > > > > *LOL*
> > > > >
> > > > > B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN
> > from
> > > > last
> > > > > spring.
> > > > > When you sping,yougotta come up with something MUCH
> > > better
> > > >
> > > > > than that!
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from
> having
> > > good
> > > > sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but did
> > not
> > > > sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are
> not
> >
> > > > because of good programming.
> > > >
> > > > B is number one? It is a bad station with no
> > competition.
> > >
> > > > WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
> > > >
> > > > Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no
> > > > competition. They killed Power to give Hot more room,
>
> > but
> > >
> > > > the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot
> should
> >
> > > > have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
> > > >
> > > > WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after its
>
> > > > disastrous experiment.
> > > >
> > > > WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is
> back
> > to
> > >
> > > > being just a shell of its former self.
> > > >
> > > > WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and
> > Pete
> > > > was obviously a mistake.
> > > >
> > > > I could go on and on…
> > > >
> > >
> > > oh DO go on.
> > > I love it when Ed's minions try to rationalize C.C.'s
> > > dominence.
> > > Now CC BOUGHT into dominence,but no mention of
> SUSTAINING
> > > it.
> > > Ed put his staions online,and they ALL still SUCK.*LOL*
> > > Face it,you work for a loser,who has done nothing but
> > > LOSE,to Newcity,to Cox and now to C.C. *LOL
> > > Man that has just GOT to suck.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Notice how "TheGenius" did not rebut what I said, because
> he
> > knows it is true. When someone points out how poorly CC's
>
> > stations are programmed, he does not argue the points
> being
> > made. He merely attacks and insults Ed Levine. Is that
> all
> > you have to offer?
> >
> > Besides, I would hardly call TK a station that sucks. It
> > seems to be doing quite well--one more reason to question
> > the credibility and competence of "TheGenius."
> >
> > Sustaining success with no competition is no reason to
> > crow--no reason to crow at all.
>
> I love how Ed's minions talk about how poorly CC stations
> are programmed. I think the listener disagrees,and son,it's
> the listener that matters,not some wannabe radio geek.If you
> are such an all knowing expert at programming,why aren't you
> doing it? If you know so much about programming a SUCCESSFUL
> station,why aren't you DOING it? Oh,I know,no one has
> discovered your true genius yet,but I'm sure it's just a
> matter of time right?
> TK does "quite well". You must have a different definition
> of "quite well" than I do. But like I said,when you work for
> Galaxy mediocrity is celebrated as a huge success.Meanwhile
> we continue to beat you like the red headed stepchild that
> you are.
> Dominating a market completely is absolute reason to
> crow,but son,you wouldn't know ANYTHING about any of
> that,now would you.
> And you know what? You never will. Not as long as you work
> for ed.
> >
>
I was right on target with my last post, and, judging by the vitriol in your reply, I must have touched a nerve. I know you are trying to drawl me out by repeating ad nauseam that I work for Galaxy, in order to try and figure out who I am and where I work. I will not give you that satisfaction. Let it suffice to say that you are way off base as to my professional situation.
Actually, yes, TK does remarkably well, especially considering their signal situation.
You have no reason to crow, because you have accomplished nothing. You lucked into heritage stations with flamethrower sticks and no competition. One of "Ed's lackeys" could program these stations as well as they currently are being programmed. All they would have to do is "nothing," which is what always has been done, except for the periodic shuffling of personnel in order to diffuse blame and accountability. I can not wait for the day when someone takes a run at B and Hot with one of the relatively few decent signals that exist in this market. When it does happen, and it will, your silence will be deafening.
T
TheGenius
Guest
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
> > > > > > > > > What a book!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station
> does
> > > > > OK...and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > JUST
> > > > > > > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down,
> HOT
> > > > down,
> > > > > > SYR
> > > > > > > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and
> the
> > > Dog
> > > > > sure
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom
> yet?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *LOL*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN
>
> > > from
> > > > > last
> > > > > > spring.
> > > > > > When you sping,yougotta come up with something
> MUCH
> > > > better
> > > > >
> > > > > > than that!
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from
> > having
> > > > good
> > > > > sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but
> did
> > > not
> > > > > sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are
>
> > not
> > >
> > > > > because of good programming.
> > > > >
> > > > > B is number one? It is a bad station with no
> > > competition.
> > > >
> > > > > WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no
> > > > > competition. They killed Power to give Hot more
> room,
> >
> > > but
> > > >
> > > > > the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot
> > should
> > >
> > > > > have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
> > > > >
> > > > > WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after
> its
> >
> > > > > disastrous experiment.
> > > > >
> > > > > WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is
> > back
> > > to
> > > >
> > > > > being just a shell of its former self.
> > > > >
> > > > > WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and
>
> > > Pete
> > > > > was obviously a mistake.
> > > > >
> > > > > I could go on and on…
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > oh DO go on.
> > > > I love it when Ed's minions try to rationalize C.C.'s
> > > > dominence.
> > > > Now CC BOUGHT into dominence,but no mention of
> > SUSTAINING
> > > > it.
> > > > Ed put his staions online,and they ALL still
> SUCK.*LOL*
> > > > Face it,you work for a loser,who has done nothing but
> > > > LOSE,to Newcity,to Cox and now to C.C. *LOL
> > > > Man that has just GOT to suck.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Notice how "TheGenius" did not rebut what I said,
> because
> > he
> > > knows it is true. When someone points out how poorly
> CC's
> >
> > > stations are programmed, he does not argue the points
> > being
> > > made. He merely attacks and insults Ed Levine. Is that
>
> > all
> > > you have to offer?
> > >
> > > Besides, I would hardly call TK a station that sucks.
> It
> > > seems to be doing quite well--one more reason to
> question
> > > the credibility and competence of "TheGenius."
> > >
> > > Sustaining success with no competition is no reason to
> > > crow--no reason to crow at all.
> >
> > I love how Ed's minions talk about how poorly CC stations
> > are programmed. I think the listener disagrees,and
> son,it's
> > the listener that matters,not some wannabe radio geek.If
> you
> > are such an all knowing expert at programming,why aren't
> you
> > doing it? If you know so much about programming a
> SUCCESSFUL
> > station,why aren't you DOING it? Oh,I know,no one has
> > discovered your true genius yet,but I'm sure it's just a
> > matter of time right?
> > TK does "quite well". You must have a different definition
>
> > of "quite well" than I do. But like I said,when you work
> for
> > Galaxy mediocrity is celebrated as a huge
> success.Meanwhile
> > we continue to beat you like the red headed stepchild that
>
> > you are.
> > Dominating a market completely is absolute reason to
> > crow,but son,you wouldn't know ANYTHING about any of
> > that,now would you.
> > And you know what? You never will. Not as long as you work
>
> > for ed.
> > >
> >
>
> I was right on target with my last post, and, judging by the
> vitriol in your reply, I must have touched a nerve. I know
> you are trying to drawl me out by repeating ad nauseam that
> I work for Galaxy, in order to try and figure out who I am
> and where I work. I will not give you that satisfaction.
> Let it suffice to say that you are way off base as to my
> professional situation.
>
> Actually, yes, TK does remarkably well, especially
> considering their signal situation.
>
> You have no reason to crow, because you have accomplished
> nothing. You lucked into heritage stations with
> flamethrower sticks and no competition. One of "Ed's
> lackeys" could program these stations as well as they
> currently are being programmed. All they would have to do
> is "nothing," which is what always has been done, except for
> the periodic shuffling of personnel in order to diffuse
> blame and accountability. I can not wait for the day when
> someone takes a run at B and Hot with one of the relatively
> few decent signals that exist in this market. When it does
> happen, and it will, your silence will be deafening.
Oh,this is just the greatest.
You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall back on don't you.
Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the "heritage" stations.
IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
Last time I checked,there was no law against coming strong against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do it????????? *LMAO*
Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And Again. And Again.
"one of ed's lackeys" could program our stations???ALL of ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN stations!!!*LOL*
Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at Galaxy?
How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
>
> > > > > > > > > What a book!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So,when you have nothing,and one station
> does
> > > > > OK...and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > JUST
> > > > > > > > OK...I guess you guys celebrate.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Speaking of nothing to celebrate...BBS down,
> HOT
> > > > down,
> > > > > > SYR
> > > > > > > WAY, WAY down, YYY down again, POWER down and
> the
> > > Dog
> > > > > sure
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > likes to play dead. Have you cracked the Dom
> yet?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *LOL*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > B still number one...hot still number 2...SYR EVEN
>
> > > from
> > > > > last
> > > > > > spring.
> > > > > > When you sping,yougotta come up with something
> MUCH
> > > > better
> > > > >
> > > > > > than that!
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Let’s face it. CC’s market dominance comes from
> > having
> > > > good
> > > > > sticks, heritage stations (which they bought, but
> did
> > > not
> > > > > sign-on), and format exclusivity. Their numbers are
>
> > not
> > >
> > > > > because of good programming.
> > > > >
> > > > > B is number one? It is a bad station with no
> > > competition.
> > > >
> > > > > WSCP, with its signal, does not count.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hot is number two? Once again, bad station with no
> > > > > competition. They killed Power to give Hot more
> room,
> >
> > > but
> > > >
> > > > > the ratings did not rise appreciably at all. Hot
> > should
> > >
> > > > > have a 12 share also, but it doesn’t.
> > > > >
> > > > > WNTQ is showing signs of coming back to life after
> its
> >
> > > > > disastrous experiment.
> > > > >
> > > > > WSYR has come down from a fluke winter book and is
> > back
> > > to
> > > >
> > > > > being just a shell of its former self.
> > > > >
> > > > > WYYY is losing audience to Sunny. Firing Brenda and
>
> > > Pete
> > > > > was obviously a mistake.
> > > > >
> > > > > I could go on and on…
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > oh DO go on.
> > > > I love it when Ed's minions try to rationalize C.C.'s
> > > > dominence.
> > > > Now CC BOUGHT into dominence,but no mention of
> > SUSTAINING
> > > > it.
> > > > Ed put his staions online,and they ALL still
> SUCK.*LOL*
> > > > Face it,you work for a loser,who has done nothing but
> > > > LOSE,to Newcity,to Cox and now to C.C. *LOL
> > > > Man that has just GOT to suck.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Notice how "TheGenius" did not rebut what I said,
> because
> > he
> > > knows it is true. When someone points out how poorly
> CC's
> >
> > > stations are programmed, he does not argue the points
> > being
> > > made. He merely attacks and insults Ed Levine. Is that
>
> > all
> > > you have to offer?
> > >
> > > Besides, I would hardly call TK a station that sucks.
> It
> > > seems to be doing quite well--one more reason to
> question
> > > the credibility and competence of "TheGenius."
> > >
> > > Sustaining success with no competition is no reason to
> > > crow--no reason to crow at all.
> >
> > I love how Ed's minions talk about how poorly CC stations
> > are programmed. I think the listener disagrees,and
> son,it's
> > the listener that matters,not some wannabe radio geek.If
> you
> > are such an all knowing expert at programming,why aren't
> you
> > doing it? If you know so much about programming a
> SUCCESSFUL
> > station,why aren't you DOING it? Oh,I know,no one has
> > discovered your true genius yet,but I'm sure it's just a
> > matter of time right?
> > TK does "quite well". You must have a different definition
>
> > of "quite well" than I do. But like I said,when you work
> for
> > Galaxy mediocrity is celebrated as a huge
> success.Meanwhile
> > we continue to beat you like the red headed stepchild that
>
> > you are.
> > Dominating a market completely is absolute reason to
> > crow,but son,you wouldn't know ANYTHING about any of
> > that,now would you.
> > And you know what? You never will. Not as long as you work
>
> > for ed.
> > >
> >
>
> I was right on target with my last post, and, judging by the
> vitriol in your reply, I must have touched a nerve. I know
> you are trying to drawl me out by repeating ad nauseam that
> I work for Galaxy, in order to try and figure out who I am
> and where I work. I will not give you that satisfaction.
> Let it suffice to say that you are way off base as to my
> professional situation.
>
> Actually, yes, TK does remarkably well, especially
> considering their signal situation.
>
> You have no reason to crow, because you have accomplished
> nothing. You lucked into heritage stations with
> flamethrower sticks and no competition. One of "Ed's
> lackeys" could program these stations as well as they
> currently are being programmed. All they would have to do
> is "nothing," which is what always has been done, except for
> the periodic shuffling of personnel in order to diffuse
> blame and accountability. I can not wait for the day when
> someone takes a run at B and Hot with one of the relatively
> few decent signals that exist in this market. When it does
> happen, and it will, your silence will be deafening.
Oh,this is just the greatest.
You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall back on don't you.
Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the "heritage" stations.
IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
Last time I checked,there was no law against coming strong against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do it????????? *LMAO*
Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And Again. And Again.
"one of ed's lackeys" could program our stations???ALL of ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN stations!!!*LOL*
Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at Galaxy?
How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
>
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
First of all...you are again an idiot because you don't delete the last message from your reply. moron. Second...you don't have a clue pal about anything. That's why you work for cc. ratings mean nothing...unless you use them to make money...and you guys AREN'T MAKING MONEY!!!!! Son, spin another record and shut your piehole!
First of all...you are again an idiot because you don't delete the last message from your reply. moron. Second...you don't have a clue pal about anything. That's why you work for cc. ratings mean nothing...unless you use them to make money...and you guys AREN'T MAKING MONEY!!!!! Son, spin another record and shut your piehole!
H
HauntingYou
Guest
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
>
> Oh,this is just the greatest.
> You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall back on
> don't you.
> Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the
> "heritage" stations.
> IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
> Last time I checked,there was no law against coming strong
> against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do
> it????????? *LMAO*
> Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And Again. And
> Again.
> "one of ed's lackeys" could program our stations???ALL of
> ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN stations!!!*LOL*
> Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at Galaxy?
> How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
> D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
> >
>
Are you actually a manager over there? If you are, you have just proved my point.
Your stations ARE broken. Except for B, every station in the cluster underperforms.
Someday, you will eat those words about crushing competition for B or Hot. I was wrong about one thing, though. When that happens, there will not be silence. You will just start attacking Ed Levine.
The reason that there are many more CC staffers at Galaxy is that CC fires so many people that they are going to end up SOMEWHERE. What does it say about CC that there ARE so many ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply on Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not reflect well on an organization.
>
> Oh,this is just the greatest.
> You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall back on
> don't you.
> Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the
> "heritage" stations.
> IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
> Last time I checked,there was no law against coming strong
> against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do
> it????????? *LMAO*
> Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And Again. And
> Again.
> "one of ed's lackeys" could program our stations???ALL of
> ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN stations!!!*LOL*
> Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at Galaxy?
> How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
> D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
> >
>
Are you actually a manager over there? If you are, you have just proved my point.
Your stations ARE broken. Except for B, every station in the cluster underperforms.
Someday, you will eat those words about crushing competition for B or Hot. I was wrong about one thing, though. When that happens, there will not be silence. You will just start attacking Ed Levine.
The reason that there are many more CC staffers at Galaxy is that CC fires so many people that they are going to end up SOMEWHERE. What does it say about CC that there ARE so many ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply on Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not reflect well on an organization.
T
TheGenius
Guest
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
> >
> > Oh,this is just the greatest.
> > You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall back on
> > don't you.
> > Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the
> > "heritage" stations.
> > IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
> > Last time I checked,there was no law against coming strong
>
> > against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do
> > it????????? *LMAO*
> > Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And Again.
> And
> > Again.
> > "one of ed's lackeys" could program our stations???ALL of
> > ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN stations!!!*LOL*
>
> > Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at Galaxy?
>
> > How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
> > D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
> > >
> >
>
> Are you actually a manager over there? If you are, you have
> just proved my point.
>
> Your stations ARE broken. Except for B, every station in
> the cluster underperforms.
>
> Someday, you will eat those words about crushing competition
> for B or Hot. I was wrong about one thing, though. When
> that happens, there will not be silence. You will just
> start attacking Ed Levine.
>
> The reason that there are many more CC staffers at Galaxy is
> that CC fires so many people that they are going to end up
> SOMEWHERE. What does it say about CC that there ARE so many
> ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply on
> Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not reflect
> well on an organization.
*LOL*
SOMEDAY this and SOMEDAY that.
OUR stations are broken?????? Should be easy to beat us then,except that you haven't EVER,and never will. I mean how many YEARS do you need?
*LOL*
Listeners don't think so pal,and here's a clue for you and ed. THEY ARE THE PEOPLE THAT MATTER.
So you keep thinking "SOMEDAY" and meanwhile we'll just keep kickin your dreaming butts...*LOL*
>
> >
> > Oh,this is just the greatest.
> > You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall back on
> > don't you.
> > Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the
> > "heritage" stations.
> > IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
> > Last time I checked,there was no law against coming strong
>
> > against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do
> > it????????? *LMAO*
> > Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And Again.
> And
> > Again.
> > "one of ed's lackeys" could program our stations???ALL of
> > ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN stations!!!*LOL*
>
> > Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at Galaxy?
>
> > How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
> > D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
> > >
> >
>
> Are you actually a manager over there? If you are, you have
> just proved my point.
>
> Your stations ARE broken. Except for B, every station in
> the cluster underperforms.
>
> Someday, you will eat those words about crushing competition
> for B or Hot. I was wrong about one thing, though. When
> that happens, there will not be silence. You will just
> start attacking Ed Levine.
>
> The reason that there are many more CC staffers at Galaxy is
> that CC fires so many people that they are going to end up
> SOMEWHERE. What does it say about CC that there ARE so many
> ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply on
> Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not reflect
> well on an organization.
*LOL*
SOMEDAY this and SOMEDAY that.
OUR stations are broken?????? Should be easy to beat us then,except that you haven't EVER,and never will. I mean how many YEARS do you need?
*LOL*
Listeners don't think so pal,and here's a clue for you and ed. THEY ARE THE PEOPLE THAT MATTER.
So you keep thinking "SOMEDAY" and meanwhile we'll just keep kickin your dreaming butts...*LOL*
>
H
HauntingYou
Guest
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
> > >
> > > Oh,this is just the greatest.
> > > You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall back on
>
> > > don't you.
> > > Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the
> > > "heritage" stations.
> > > IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
> > > Last time I checked,there was no law against coming
> strong
> >
> > > against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do
> > > it????????? *LMAO*
> > > Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And Again.
> > And
> > > Again.
> > > "one of ed's lackeys" could program our stations???ALL
> of
> > > ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN
> stations!!!*LOL*
> >
> > > Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at
> Galaxy?
> >
> > > How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
> > > D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > Are you actually a manager over there? If you are, you
> have
> > just proved my point.
> >
> > Your stations ARE broken. Except for B, every station in
> > the cluster underperforms.
> >
> > Someday, you will eat those words about crushing
> competition
> > for B or Hot. I was wrong about one thing, though. When
> > that happens, there will not be silence. You will just
> > start attacking Ed Levine.
> >
> > The reason that there are many more CC staffers at Galaxy
> is
> > that CC fires so many people that they are going to end up
>
> > SOMEWHERE. What does it say about CC that there ARE so
> many
> > ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply on
> > Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not reflect
>
> > well on an organization.
>
>
> *LOL*
> SOMEDAY this and SOMEDAY that.
> OUR stations are broken?????? Should be easy to beat us
> then,except that you haven't EVER,and never will. I mean how
> many YEARS do you need?
> *LOL*
> Listeners don't think so pal,and here's a clue for you and
> ed. THEY ARE THE PEOPLE THAT MATTER.
> So you keep thinking "SOMEDAY" and meanwhile we'll just keep
> kickin your dreaming butts...*LOL*
>
> >
>
Okay. LOL
He who laughs last, laughs loudest.
> > >
> > > Oh,this is just the greatest.
> > > You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall back on
>
> > > don't you.
> > > Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the
> > > "heritage" stations.
> > > IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
> > > Last time I checked,there was no law against coming
> strong
> >
> > > against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do
> > > it????????? *LMAO*
> > > Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And Again.
> > And
> > > Again.
> > > "one of ed's lackeys" could program our stations???ALL
> of
> > > ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN
> stations!!!*LOL*
> >
> > > Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at
> Galaxy?
> >
> > > How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
> > > D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > Are you actually a manager over there? If you are, you
> have
> > just proved my point.
> >
> > Your stations ARE broken. Except for B, every station in
> > the cluster underperforms.
> >
> > Someday, you will eat those words about crushing
> competition
> > for B or Hot. I was wrong about one thing, though. When
> > that happens, there will not be silence. You will just
> > start attacking Ed Levine.
> >
> > The reason that there are many more CC staffers at Galaxy
> is
> > that CC fires so many people that they are going to end up
>
> > SOMEWHERE. What does it say about CC that there ARE so
> many
> > ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply on
> > Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not reflect
>
> > well on an organization.
>
>
> *LOL*
> SOMEDAY this and SOMEDAY that.
> OUR stations are broken?????? Should be easy to beat us
> then,except that you haven't EVER,and never will. I mean how
> many YEARS do you need?
> *LOL*
> Listeners don't think so pal,and here's a clue for you and
> ed. THEY ARE THE PEOPLE THAT MATTER.
> So you keep thinking "SOMEDAY" and meanwhile we'll just keep
> kickin your dreaming butts...*LOL*
>
> >
>
Okay. LOL
He who laughs last, laughs loudest.
T
TheGenius
Guest
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
> > > >
> > > > Oh,this is just the greatest.
> > > > You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall back
> on
> >
> > > > don't you.
> > > > Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the
> > > > "heritage" stations.
> > > > IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
> > > > Last time I checked,there was no law against coming
> > strong
> > >
> > > > against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do
> > > > it????????? *LMAO*
> > > > Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And
> Again.
> > > And
> > > > Again.
> > > > "one of ed's lackeys" could program our stations???ALL
>
> > of
> > > > ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN
> > stations!!!*LOL*
> > >
> > > > Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at
> > Galaxy?
> > >
> > > > How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
> > > > D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Are you actually a manager over there? If you are, you
> > have
> > > just proved my point.
> > >
> > > Your stations ARE broken. Except for B, every station
> in
> > > the cluster underperforms.
> > >
> > > Someday, you will eat those words about crushing
> > competition
> > > for B or Hot. I was wrong about one thing, though. When
>
> > > that happens, there will not be silence. You will just
> > > start attacking Ed Levine.
> > >
> > > The reason that there are many more CC staffers at
> Galaxy
> > is
> > > that CC fires so many people that they are going to end
> up
> >
> > > SOMEWHERE. What does it say about CC that there ARE so
> > many
> > > ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply
> on
> > > Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not
> reflect
> >
> > > well on an organization.
> >
> >
> > *LOL*
> > SOMEDAY this and SOMEDAY that.
> > OUR stations are broken?????? Should be easy to beat us
> > then,except that you haven't EVER,and never will. I mean
> how
> > many YEARS do you need?
> > *LOL*
> > Listeners don't think so pal,and here's a clue for you and
>
> > ed. THEY ARE THE PEOPLE THAT MATTER.
> > So you keep thinking "SOMEDAY" and meanwhile we'll just
> keep
> > kickin your dreaming butts...*LOL*
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
> Okay. LOL
>
> He who laughs last, laughs loudest.
yeah,I'll just hold my breath waiting for Galaxy to do something to actually come after the market dominator.
Now lets talk about loyalty. First of all the people let go by CC weren't doing the job. Pretty simple. So CCs scraps are better than anything that ed could hire,and yet still not good enough to remain at CC.
You want tot alk about loyalty? Check your company and see how many employees you have with tenure of 10 years or more. Now check CC and the key people they've had in place for more than 15 years.*LOL*
You better come up with something better then this son,I mean your game is WEAK.
>
> > > >
> > > > Oh,this is just the greatest.
> > > > You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall back
> on
> >
> > > > don't you.
> > > > Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the
> > > > "heritage" stations.
> > > > IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
> > > > Last time I checked,there was no law against coming
> > strong
> > >
> > > > against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do
> > > > it????????? *LMAO*
> > > > Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And
> Again.
> > > And
> > > > Again.
> > > > "one of ed's lackeys" could program our stations???ALL
>
> > of
> > > > ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN
> > stations!!!*LOL*
> > >
> > > > Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at
> > Galaxy?
> > >
> > > > How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
> > > > D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Are you actually a manager over there? If you are, you
> > have
> > > just proved my point.
> > >
> > > Your stations ARE broken. Except for B, every station
> in
> > > the cluster underperforms.
> > >
> > > Someday, you will eat those words about crushing
> > competition
> > > for B or Hot. I was wrong about one thing, though. When
>
> > > that happens, there will not be silence. You will just
> > > start attacking Ed Levine.
> > >
> > > The reason that there are many more CC staffers at
> Galaxy
> > is
> > > that CC fires so many people that they are going to end
> up
> >
> > > SOMEWHERE. What does it say about CC that there ARE so
> > many
> > > ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply
> on
> > > Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not
> reflect
> >
> > > well on an organization.
> >
> >
> > *LOL*
> > SOMEDAY this and SOMEDAY that.
> > OUR stations are broken?????? Should be easy to beat us
> > then,except that you haven't EVER,and never will. I mean
> how
> > many YEARS do you need?
> > *LOL*
> > Listeners don't think so pal,and here's a clue for you and
>
> > ed. THEY ARE THE PEOPLE THAT MATTER.
> > So you keep thinking "SOMEDAY" and meanwhile we'll just
> keep
> > kickin your dreaming butts...*LOL*
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
> Okay. LOL
>
> He who laughs last, laughs loudest.
yeah,I'll just hold my breath waiting for Galaxy to do something to actually come after the market dominator.
Now lets talk about loyalty. First of all the people let go by CC weren't doing the job. Pretty simple. So CCs scraps are better than anything that ed could hire,and yet still not good enough to remain at CC.
You want tot alk about loyalty? Check your company and see how many employees you have with tenure of 10 years or more. Now check CC and the key people they've had in place for more than 15 years.*LOL*
You better come up with something better then this son,I mean your game is WEAK.
>
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
your staff is weak. Being at a station for so long does not mean success son.
your staff is unhappy no-where-to-go folk that are treated like dirt. Unless you're in the management circle where nobody does wrong. and they take all the credit. have you made budget yet. with those great numbers you should be. keep playing those god awful thirty second spots son.
your staff is weak. Being at a station for so long does not mean success son.
your staff is unhappy no-where-to-go folk that are treated like dirt. Unless you're in the management circle where nobody does wrong. and they take all the credit. have you made budget yet. with those great numbers you should be. keep playing those god awful thirty second spots son.
H
HauntingYou
Guest
Re: Let us consider the obvious:
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh,this is just the greatest.
> > > > > You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall
> back
> > on
> > >
> > > > > don't you.
> > > > > Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the
>
> > > > > "heritage" stations.
> > > > > IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
> > > > > Last time I checked,there was no law against coming
> > > strong
> > > >
> > > > > against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do
> > > > > it????????? *LMAO*
> > > > > Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And
> > Again.
> > > > And
> > > > > Again.
> > > > > "one of ed's lackeys" could program our
> stations???ALL
> >
> > > of
> > > > > ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN
> > > stations!!!*LOL*
> > > >
> > > > > Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at
> > > Galaxy?
> > > >
> > > > > How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
> > > > > D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Are you actually a manager over there? If you are,
> you
> > > have
> > > > just proved my point.
> > > >
> > > > Your stations ARE broken. Except for B, every station
>
> > in
> > > > the cluster underperforms.
> > > >
> > > > Someday, you will eat those words about crushing
> > > competition
> > > > for B or Hot. I was wrong about one thing, though.
> When
> >
> > > > that happens, there will not be silence. You will
> just
> > > > start attacking Ed Levine.
> > > >
> > > > The reason that there are many more CC staffers at
> > Galaxy
> > > is
> > > > that CC fires so many people that they are going to
> end
> > up
> > >
> > > > SOMEWHERE. What does it say about CC that there ARE
> so
> > > many
> > > > ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply
>
> > on
> > > > Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not
> > reflect
> > >
> > > > well on an organization.
> > >
> > >
> > > *LOL*
> > > SOMEDAY this and SOMEDAY that.
> > > OUR stations are broken?????? Should be easy to beat us
> > > then,except that you haven't EVER,and never will. I mean
>
> > how
> > > many YEARS do you need?
> > > *LOL*
> > > Listeners don't think so pal,and here's a clue for you
> and
> >
> > > ed. THEY ARE THE PEOPLE THAT MATTER.
> > > So you keep thinking "SOMEDAY" and meanwhile we'll just
> > keep
> > > kickin your dreaming butts...*LOL*
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Okay. LOL
> >
> > He who laughs last, laughs loudest.
>
>
> yeah,I'll just hold my breath waiting for Galaxy to do
> something to actually come after the market dominator.
> Now lets talk about loyalty. First of all the people let go
> by CC weren't doing the job. Pretty simple. So CCs scraps
> are better than anything that ed could hire,and yet still
> not good enough to remain at CC.
> You want tot alk about loyalty? Check your company and see
> how many employees you have with tenure of 10 years or more.
> Now check CC and the key people they've had in place for
> more than 15 years.*LOL*
> You better come up with something better then this son,I
> mean your game is WEAK.
> >
>
Sorry...
Again, you are wrong about who I am and where I work. Alas, you are wrong about most things. I am not sure how many people in which building have worked for what amount of time. That a tight inner circle on Plum Street screws over the majority of the employees there means nothing. Sure, at CC, there is job security for the select few, but the rest of the staff always has one foot out the door.
Your transparent attempt to shade and spin what I said does not change the truth. I repeat:
"What does it say about CC that there ARE so many ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply on Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not reflect well on an organization."
What does that say about CC? They do not know how to hire employees? They do not know how to train employees? They do not know how to manage employees?
Let's not even talk about the multitudes who have left on their own.
The airstaff of 93Q--now that is stability. In fact, Delmonico and Lauber tried to lure Ted and Amy over to Y94. Ted and Amy wisely turned them down. Hmmmmmmmmmmm......
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh,this is just the greatest.
> > > > > You Galaxy minions always have an excuse to fall
> back
> > on
> > >
> > > > > don't you.
> > > > > Hey son,you say CC hasn't done anything but ride the
>
> > > > > "heritage" stations.
> > > > > IF IT AIN'T BROKE,DON'T FIX IT. *lol*
> > > > > Last time I checked,there was no law against coming
> > > strong
> > > >
> > > > > against B or Hot or WSYR,so why doesn't someone do
> > > > > it????????? *LMAO*
> > > > > Because they know they'll get crushed.Again. And
> > Again.
> > > > And
> > > > > Again.
> > > > > "one of ed's lackeys" could program our
> stations???ALL
> >
> > > of
> > > > > ed's lackeys can't even program THEIR OWN
> > > stations!!!*LOL*
> > > >
> > > > > Lets do some math. How many ex cc staffers work at
> > > Galaxy?
> > > >
> > > > > How many ex Galaxy staffers work at CC????
> > > > > D-U-U-U-U-U-U-H.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Are you actually a manager over there? If you are,
> you
> > > have
> > > > just proved my point.
> > > >
> > > > Your stations ARE broken. Except for B, every station
>
> > in
> > > > the cluster underperforms.
> > > >
> > > > Someday, you will eat those words about crushing
> > > competition
> > > > for B or Hot. I was wrong about one thing, though.
> When
> >
> > > > that happens, there will not be silence. You will
> just
> > > > start attacking Ed Levine.
> > > >
> > > > The reason that there are many more CC staffers at
> > Galaxy
> > > is
> > > > that CC fires so many people that they are going to
> end
> > up
> > >
> > > > SOMEWHERE. What does it say about CC that there ARE
> so
> > > many
> > > > ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply
>
> > on
> > > > Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not
> > reflect
> > >
> > > > well on an organization.
> > >
> > >
> > > *LOL*
> > > SOMEDAY this and SOMEDAY that.
> > > OUR stations are broken?????? Should be easy to beat us
> > > then,except that you haven't EVER,and never will. I mean
>
> > how
> > > many YEARS do you need?
> > > *LOL*
> > > Listeners don't think so pal,and here's a clue for you
> and
> >
> > > ed. THEY ARE THE PEOPLE THAT MATTER.
> > > So you keep thinking "SOMEDAY" and meanwhile we'll just
> > keep
> > > kickin your dreaming butts...*LOL*
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Okay. LOL
> >
> > He who laughs last, laughs loudest.
>
>
> yeah,I'll just hold my breath waiting for Galaxy to do
> something to actually come after the market dominator.
> Now lets talk about loyalty. First of all the people let go
> by CC weren't doing the job. Pretty simple. So CCs scraps
> are better than anything that ed could hire,and yet still
> not good enough to remain at CC.
> You want tot alk about loyalty? Check your company and see
> how many employees you have with tenure of 10 years or more.
> Now check CC and the key people they've had in place for
> more than 15 years.*LOL*
> You better come up with something better then this son,I
> mean your game is WEAK.
> >
>
Sorry...
Again, you are wrong about who I am and where I work. Alas, you are wrong about most things. I am not sure how many people in which building have worked for what amount of time. That a tight inner circle on Plum Street screws over the majority of the employees there means nothing. Sure, at CC, there is job security for the select few, but the rest of the staff always has one foot out the door.
Your transparent attempt to shade and spin what I said does not change the truth. I repeat:
"What does it say about CC that there ARE so many ex-CC staffers? Loyalty apparently is in short supply on Plum Street. Having a ton of ex-staffers does not reflect well on an organization."
What does that say about CC? They do not know how to hire employees? They do not know how to train employees? They do not know how to manage employees?
Let's not even talk about the multitudes who have left on their own.
The airstaff of 93Q--now that is stability. In fact, Delmonico and Lauber tried to lure Ted and Amy over to Y94. Ted and Amy wisely turned them down. Hmmmmmmmmmmm......
- Status
- This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.