"While I've got you here..." SIRIUS OR XM?
It's a little like asking...
"Ginger or Mary Ann?"
"Mac or PC?"
"Dogs or cats?"
At the risk of seeming-like-a-consultant, I just can't resist the temptation to ask ANY gathering of oldies aficionados: WHICH IS BETTER, SIRIUS OR XM?
I don't own either, but hear both often, in rental cars.
And I get XM channels on DirecTV at home.
Being in-the-demographic, I always stream-into the 60s and 70s channels...and there's a fundamental difference in approach.
Sirius plays more music; XM puts more "stuff" between the songs.
XM's 60s-on-6 channel is full of what-THEY-seem-to-consider "atmosphere."
Old jingles, old-medium-market-sounding-DJ, old COMMERCIALS.
Yep, on the commercial-FREE music channels.
They seem to be trying to re-create the sound of vintage upper-band directional AM radio.
As opposed to delivering-listeners-who-fled-AM/FM-clutter clutter-FREE music.
Which is what the Sirius 60s channel sounds like, by comparison.
You can tell which of the two I prefer.
But, "while I've got you here," do oldies listeners prefer the Sirius approach? Or XM's?
Admittedly, I'm changing-the-subject here. And I ask all this at-the-risk-of throwing-gasoline-on-flames-I'm-trying-to-douse RE WZTK-going-oldies. But, when I'm NOT working (stations-that-don't-play-music), 60s/70s music is my favorite kind of radio. If it's yours, and if you have satellite radio, would you rather just hear hit-after-hit-after-hit, or would you rather hear the "museum" approach?
One, eight hundred...
Holland Cooke
News/Talk Specialist
McVay Media
www.HollandCooke.com