U
Unregistered
Guest
KURV Edinburg news/talk 710 kurv
It looks like they are protecting KNUS and KCMO:
http://radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=KGNC&service=AM&status=L&hours=D
In East Tennessee, WEKC, Williamstown, KY by day, and the Cuban chorus or WOR by night
In Dayton, OH all splatter/iBoc from WLW but pre-IBOC, it was possible to get WOR at night
Re: KGNC....
I'm not sure if they're required to protect either KNUS or KCMO. Although indeed that may be the case. My guess, however, is that they're protecting KIRO and WOR, which also has the effect of giving SOME protection to KNUS and KCMO.
When I was in college in southeastern Iowa in the late 1960s, I regularly listened to top 40 on WHB (then on 710). When they powered down and went to night pattern, KGNC frequently would take over. But only for a short while before it was KGNC's turn to go to night pattern. At that point, a much-weaker WHB would take over again. At that point, WHB would be pretty much unlistenable, but there wasn't enough left of WOR or anything else to overtake it. KEEL was also an occasional sunset visitor. I don't have any memory of hearing Cuba in those days. The current "Cuban chorus" setup may not have been in place then.
Minutia, but I read somewhere that back in the early days, like many broadcasters, WOR used a longwire antenna. When they upgraded, they decided they wanted to stay true to the coverage area provided by the longwire. That meant a directional array.
True. But the antenna used by WOR and most stations of the time was more correctly called a "flattop". They were not end-fed like longwires are, but center fed to a horizontal component that was as high off the ground as possible. That made them, in a sense, like any top loaded antenna of the later years of AM. And they tended to be a bit directional, although the principal radiating part of the antenna was the vertical component.
WOR had all along wanted to cover both New York and Philadelphia. With the use of a directional and the low noise levels of the time, they actually did. Their advertising in trade journals in much of the 30's was focused on the coverage of the two big markets.
There would be absolutely no reason for KGNC to protect WOR or KIRO in the daytime. They are too far distant to need any protection from KGNC at all. Given the high ground conductivity of the panhandle - KGNC's impressive daytime footprint is understandable - as would its threat to any 710 within several hundred miles. WOR, on the other had, has a directional pattern (for whatever reason) that does not allow it to come anywhere close to Texas at night. I've never heard it, anywhere in Texas - although I suspect I have heard its sidebands at night.
My post speculating which stations KGNC might be required to protect referred to nighttime. Apologies for not making that clear. Obviously there'd be no reason for KGNC to protect New York and Seattle during daytime.