>>Any change that forces listeners to buy new radios to continue listening to AM will only speed the failure of the service. As you suggest, quite simply, nobody is going to spend $$ just to get AM.
Interesting fact from bostonradio.org's Boston radio timeline:
1949:
>>Although the economy in general and radio in particular are doing quite well, many FM stations are in the red with no end in sight. The relocation of the FM band rendered most of the existing receiver base obsolete, and with many new AM stations taking to the air, there is little incentive for consumers to purchase expensive new FM tuners. As a result, new FM stations nationwide—some even licensed to deep-pocketed owners—begin to go off the air. In Boston, WBMS-FM (104.1) is the first, after just two years of operation.
http://bostonradio.org/timeline/timeline-40s
Who would have thought then that eventually FM would become the dominant band, with
many AM stations switching to or simulcasting on FM to grab younger listeners.
>>Any change that forces listeners to buy new radios to continue listening to AM will only speed the failure of the service. As you suggest, quite simply, nobody is going to spend $$ just to get AM.
AM could well continue as analog broadcasting and you could have stuff like ethnic, pirate stations, religious, whatever, with most of the action taking place on FM. But will the time come
when manufacturers pretty much do FM only radios? (Or, AM goes all digital...?) I don't know if there are any car stereos
that don't offer AM...though mp3 players stick to FM only, generally. (And those portable
HD radios offer FM only but some AM stations show up as HD2s and HD3s, such as WBZ and
WXKS in Boston)
But if AM went all digital it could indeed make those old analog radios as inoperable as the
old non-digital TV sets without cable, sat., or a converter. Some might have to pay extra to
get a radio with AM as well as FM...? Who knows.
Remember FM converters for car radios...?
http://www.antiqueradio.com/images/Aug06-Listen-Fig1.jpg