Yep. If they wanted to just go out and kill the AM band entirely, it would be hard to imagine a more effective vehicle than IBOC. Especially when you layer in the cynical legal manipulations which deprive victim stations of any effective petition for relief. The willingness of these HD-pushers to self- and mutually-annihilate is just mind-boggling. At least to those of us with operational minds.
And Tom Wells - I plead guilty to inadvertently impugning 78 rpm records. And you are also right about the bandwidth requirements for a 10 kHz vs. 5 kHz wide AM signal.
There were some fine-sounding 78 rpm records, especially when the sound was run through one of the dynamic noise suppressor circuits which were coming into widespread use at the end of the 78 period. And the Decca "FFrr" (Full Frequency Range Reproduction) records from Britain post-WW2 typically went out to 8 kHz. They sounded far more natural than many of the 45 rpm singles which also provided about 5 kHz bandpass until the onset of the stereo disc era in 1957.
And Tom Wells - I plead guilty to inadvertently impugning 78 rpm records. And you are also right about the bandwidth requirements for a 10 kHz vs. 5 kHz wide AM signal.
There were some fine-sounding 78 rpm records, especially when the sound was run through one of the dynamic noise suppressor circuits which were coming into widespread use at the end of the 78 period. And the Decca "FFrr" (Full Frequency Range Reproduction) records from Britain post-WW2 typically went out to 8 kHz. They sounded far more natural than many of the 45 rpm singles which also provided about 5 kHz bandpass until the onset of the stereo disc era in 1957.