I'm an outlier like
@vchimpanzee with similar musical preferences (I grew up mostly on standards and 50s/early 60s oldies), and as such I also don't care much for what's on the radio nowadays. However, I don't blame programmers like
@K.M. Richards for that problem. They're working hard to program their formats as best as they can so that people listen and advertisers buy in, and I respect that because of that, they can't really pander to the demands of outliers like vchimp and myself. In other words, they're just playing songs that a
majority of people want to hear, based on research. If all they did was cater to us outliers, the stations they program would probably run out of money in no time, unless said stations were listener-supported non-coms or something, maybe.
That said, in the increasingly few instances where stations do play the stuff we outliers like, they're often relatively small and located in tiny markets that don't subscribe to Neilsen for ratings. If it weren't for streaming, at least for me, the options would be slim to none (KYNO is the one saving grace for me; if I tire of listening to the news while driving home at night, I can tune to 940 and enjoy).
If
I ever had the opportunity to program a commercial station airing a mainstream format (classic hits, AC, whatever) where ratings were a factor, despite my dislike of most new music, I would probably have to set that aside and play what must be played to get the ratings that must be gotten. It's how stations make their money.
Even so, I probably would try to sneak in some of my favorite stuff here and there, if enough people like it and it fits whatever the format of this hypothetical station is.
c