rbrucecarter5 said:
Is this even legal?.......
......A football game from some high school across the country is not a compelling reason to violate the terms of a license. After a hurricane strike or other natural disaster, maybe - it is vital information needed by survivors. But football? Not a necessity, does not serve the public interest.
From my own experience, I can see both sides of the argument. I began my career over four decades ago at a small town AM/FM combo. A true mom & pop shoestring operation. The AM was a daytimer. The high school sports went on the FM. So there was NO powering up....we were OFF. Period.
But high school sports was a cash cow....and a true win-win. We went out of our way to max the visibility of our "sports boosters" with good exposure throughout the broadcast day. The sponsor feedback was almost 100% positive, and the volume of phone calls we got if the line went down (fortunately very rarely) proved the strong community interest. (Admittedly this was in the day before internet, 300-channel CATV, etc.)
But there was another community benefit as well.... The revenue we got from high school sports enabled us to be able to afford things like staff to cover city council and school board meetings. The results of which would otherwise not get reported until the twice-weekly newspaper came out. It also
gave us "breathing room" to better maintain other operational aspects, including public service. It might not even be a stretch to say that at least one staffer could have owed his or her job to high school sports income.
Fast forward to today. My guess is that perhaps some small AM stations are finding that the revenue from high school sports is a vital component to their very survival. Or perhaps a keeping segment of "live and local" programming versus the bird. If it's a case of whether or not some small community gets to keep some or all of its local service....then a couple of hours of "looking the other way" would seem to be a small price to pay.
So the bottom line is that while I agree that operating at a higher-than authorized power should not be condoned, I also see more upside than downside in the FCC looking the other way. That said, my personal view is that the de-facto "STA" should ONLY be allowed AS LONG AS there are no listener complaints or documentable interference complaints from co-channel stations. Abuses such as extending the daytime power/pattern beyond the sports broadcast should also bring about a crackdown.
Just one man's humble opinion.