• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Analysis Of NFL Television Schedules

J

Joseph_Gallant

Guest
Hers's some comments on the NFL's 2006 television schedule.

A Tradition Continues: As has been the case for the past two decades (with only one or two exceptions), the defending Super Bowl champion (in this year's case, the Pittsburgh Steelers) will open defense of their title in prime-time, and as has been the case the last couple of year, the defending champions will play in the first NFL game of the season (Thursday, September 7th, NBC).

A Tradition Ends: After having played a handful of regular-season games on Saturday afternoons during the last two or three weeks of the season for as long as I can remember (which has to be at least since the 1960's), the league will no longer play those late-season Saturday matinees in mid-and-late December (except possibly when Christmas Eve is a Saturday). Instead, there will be some Saturday-night games during the final weeks of the season on the league-owned NFL Network (and some Thursdays in late November and early December as well).

In the case of Fox, I expect local affiliates will get the airtime back and fill the gap by airing more infomercials (outside of large markets), while CBS will probably fill the gap by covering more early-season college basketball games. One wild-card: With no more late-season Saturday-afternoon NFL games, could NBC and ABC end-up adding two or three Saturday afternoons of NHL and NBA games respectively during December, given that they will not go head-to-head against NFL telecasts and maybe attract viewers??

Opening Weekend: As has been the case for the past 25 or so years (except for the four-year period from 1994 through 1997 when the network did not have the NFL), all of CBS' regional telecasts on the first Sunday of the season (September 10th) will be 1:05 P.M. EDT kick-offs to permit the network to cover the U.S. Open tennis tournament at 4 EDT. Fox has three 4:15 P.M. EDT games that first week, one of which (Dallas at Jacksonville) will likely be broadcast on most of the network, given it's Terrell Owens' first regular-season game in a Dallas Cowboys' uniform.

Sunday Night Is The New Monday Night And Monday Night Is The New Sunday Night: There's no doubt about it. The NFL's premiere television showcase is now Sunday nights on NBC. It's the game that will receive "flexible" scheduling, and even those games (through November 5th) that have already been scheduled feature some (on paper at this point) pretty good match-ups. The Monday games, now on ESPN, do not have as attractive match-ups as they did when ABC had the games.

But two Monday-nights are of interest. On September 11th, there will be a doubleheader (Minnesota at Washington at 7:05 P.M. EDT; San Diego at Oakland at 10:15 P.m. EDT), while two weeks later (September 25th), New Orleans will host Atlanta in their first home game at the Superdome since 2004. That could be quite an emotional night.

Old Home Week: Two NFL superstars who left their old teams in the offseason will return to their old haunts with their new teammates this season. On October 8th, Owens and Dallas will face his old team, Philadelphia, at 4:15 P.M. EDT on Fox, a game that will be broadcast to all but three affiliates of the Fox Network. The exceptions: Phoenix, Jacksonville, and San Francisco, whose local teams will be playing a home game (on CBS) at that hour. The game will be in Philly, so it will be interesting to hear reactions of the fans.

And on Sunday, November 5th, former New England placekicker Adam Vineterri will lead his new team, Indianapolis, back to Foxboro to face his old club. That will be an NBC "Sunday Night Football" telecast and make what already was one of the best NFL rivalries in recent years even more exciting.

Even More Flexible Scheduling: Although the big news about the schedule was the flexibility NBC gets for "Sunday Night Football" during the latter part of the season, CBS and Fox also get some late-season flexibility: On Sundays from November 12th through the end of the regular-season, only games in the Mountain and Pacific time are listed as 4:05 or 4:15 P.M. EST starts. All other games in the Eastern and Central time zones kick-off at 1:05 EST.

After NBC gets it's "pick" of the Sunday-night game, CBS and Fox will then have the option of moving one or more of their 1:05 P.M. games to 4:05 or 4:15 to put them on a larger piece of the network than what would otherwise be possible had the game stayed at 1:05.

An example as to how this might work: Let's look at the schedule for Sunday, November 26th. Let's assume that NBC moves the Chicago at New England game from 1:05 to 8:15 EST for it's "Sunday Night" game.

Fox has the doubleheader that day (although they have no "late" games selected yet). Let's say that the Philadelphia Eagles are leading the NFC East and the Indianapolis Colts are leading the AFC South. Thus, Fox (which will cover this game, since it's in Indianapolis) might decide to move the game from 1:05 to 4:15 EST to put it on most of the network.

Sideline Reporters??: I have not heard or read anything to suggest that CBS has named sideline reporters to replace Bonnie Bernstein (who has started her own business) and Armen Ketayan (now an investigative reporter for CBS News), nor anything about NBC naming a sideline reporter for "Sunday Night Football". Might the networks be thinking of replacing on-air sideline reporters with off-air sideline reporters who relay information to the producer in the truck who in turn relays the information to the game announcers??

Stars On Broadcast: The season-ending NFL Pro Bowl in Honolulu (Saturday, February 10th) will be on broadcast-television (CBS) for the first time in several years. Starting this year, the Pro Bowl will be on the same network as the Super Bowl, and may be the only all-star game of a "big four" pro sport on broadcast television in 2007 (the NHL and NBA all-star games are on cable; the Major League Baseball All-Star Game will likely move from Fox to cable in 2007 as well).

The NFL Still Doesn't Get It: And finally, the league still insists on a two-week gap between the AFC/NFC Conference championships and the Super Bowl. Hopefully, the next NFL commissioner will end this stupid practice and play the Big Game one week after the conference championships.

But then again, to reduce the gap from two weeks to one week would push the Super Bowl back into late January, prior to the start of the February sweeps. The networks (and their affiliates) aren't going to like that.
 
> Hers's some comments on the NFL's 2006 television schedule.
>
> A Tradition Continues: As has been the case for the past two
> decades (with only one or two exceptions), the defending
> Super Bowl champion (in this year's case, the Pittsburgh
> Steelers) will open defense of their title in prime-time,
> and as has been the case the last couple of year, the
> defending champions will play in the first NFL game of the
> season (Thursday, September 7th, NBC).
>
> A Tradition Ends: After having played a handful of
> regular-season games on Saturday afternoons during the last
> two or three weeks of the season for as long as I can
> remember (which has to be at least since the 1960's), the
> league will no longer play those late-season Saturday
> matinees in mid-and-late December (except possibly when
> Christmas Eve is a Saturday). Instead, there will be some
> Saturday-night games during the final weeks of the season on
> the league-owned NFL Network (and some Thursdays in late
> November and early December as well).

> Yeah When did that actually start? I always thought it was 1978.
>
In the case of Fox, I expect local affiliates will get the
> airtime back and fill the gap by airing more infomercials
> (outside of large markets), while CBS will probably fill the
> gap by covering more early-season college basketball games.
> One wild-card: With no more late-season Saturday-afternoon
> NFL games, could NBC and ABC end-up adding two or three
> Saturday afternoons of NHL and NBA games respectively during
> December, given that they will not go head-to-head against
> NFL telecasts and maybe attract viewers??
>
> Opening Weekend: As has been the case for the past 25 or so
> years (except for the four-year period from 1994 through
> 1997 when the network did not have the NFL), all of CBS'
> regional telecasts on the first Sunday of the season
> (September 10th) will be 1:05 P.M. EDT kick-offs to permit
> the network to cover the U.S. Open tennis tournament at 4
> EDT. Fox has three 4:15 P.M. EDT games that first week, one
> of which (Dallas at Jacksonville) will likely be broadcast
> on most of the network, given it's Terrell Owens' first
> regular-season game in a Dallas Cowboys' uniform.
>
FOX is making out like a bandit for this season.
> Sunday Night Is The New Monday Night And Monday Night Is The
> New Sunday Night: There's no doubt about it. The NFL's
> premiere television showcase is now Sunday nights on NBC.
> It's the game that will receive "flexible" scheduling, and
> even those games (through November 5th) that have already
> been scheduled feature some (on paper at this point) pretty
> good match-ups. The Monday games, now on ESPN, do not have
> as attractive match-ups as they did when ABC had the games.
>
But they've got to be better than last year's stinkers.
Will NBC have a game for all 17 regular season weeks?

> But two Monday-nights are of interest. On September 11th,
> there will be a doubleheader (Minnesota at Washington at
> 7:05 P.M. EDT; San Diego at Oakland at 10:15 P.m. EDT),
> while two weeks later (September 25th), New Orleans will
> host Atlanta in their first home game at the Superdome since
> 2004. That could be quite an emotional night.
>
ESPN will definitley put the prestige back into Monday Nights.
>
Old Home Week: Two NFL superstars who left their old teams
> in the offseason will return to their old haunts with their
> new teammates this season. On October 8th, Owens and Dallas
> will face his old team, Philadelphia, at 4:15 P.M. EDT on
> Fox, a game that will be broadcast to all but three
> affiliates of the Fox Network. The exceptions: Phoenix,
> Jacksonville, and San Francisco, whose local teams will be
> playing a home game (on CBS) at that hour. The game will be
> in Philly, so it will be interesting to hear reactions of
> the fans.

> The NFL is definitley the new NBA.

> And on Sunday, November 5th, former New England placekicker
> Adam Vineterri will lead his new team, Indianapolis, back to
> Foxboro to face his old club. That will be an NBC "Sunday
> Night Football" telecast and make what already was one of
> the best NFL rivalries in recent years even more exciting.

> Hello NBC's first top 10 show in 2 years.

> Even More Flexible Scheduling: Although the big news about
> the schedule was the flexibility NBC gets for "Sunday Night
> Football" during the latter part of the season, CBS and Fox
> also get some late-season flexibility: On Sundays from
> November 12th through the end of the regular-season, only
> games in the Mountain and Pacific time are listed as 4:05 or
> 4:15 P.M. EST starts. All other games in the Eastern and
> Central time zones kick-off at 1:05 EST.
>
> After NBC gets it's "pick" of the Sunday-night game, CBS and
> Fox will then have the option of moving one or more of their
> 1:05 P.M. games to 4:05 or 4:15 to put them on a larger
> piece of the network than what would otherwise be possible
> had the game stayed at 1:05.

> Networks working together, The Apocalypse is coming!

> An example as to how this might work: Let's look at the
> schedule for Sunday, November 26th. Let's assume that NBC
> moves the Chicago at New England game from 1:05 to 8:15 EST
> for it's "Sunday Night" game.
>
> Fox has the doubleheader that day (although they have no
> "late" games selected yet). Let's say that the Philadelphia
> Eagles are leading the NFC East and the Indianapolis Colts
> are leading the AFC South. Thus, Fox (which will cover this
> game, since it's in Indianapolis) might decide to move the
> game from 1:05 to 4:15 EST to put it on most of the network.
>
>
> Sideline Reporters??: I have not heard or read anything to
> suggest that CBS has named sideline reporters to replace
> Bonnie Bernstein (who has started her own business) and
> Armen Ketayan (now an investigative reporter for CBS News),
> nor anything about NBC naming a sideline reporter for
> "Sunday Night Football". Might the networks be thinking of
> replacing on-air sideline reporters with off-air sideline
> reporters who relay information to the producer in the truck
> who in turn relays the information to the game announcers??

> Maybe we won't see any this year.

> Stars On Broadcast: The season-ending NFL Pro Bowl in
> Honolulu (Saturday, February 10th) will be on
> broadcast-television (CBS) for the first time in several
> years. Starting this year, the Pro Bowl will be on the same
> network as the Super Bowl, and may be the only all-star game
> of a "big four" pro sport on broadcast television in 2007
> (the NHL and NBA all-star games are on cable; the Major
> League Baseball All-Star Game will likely move from Fox to
> cable in 2007 as well).
> Is the Pro Bowl really an all star game anyway considering the amount of
stars that have missed in year's past.

> The NFL Still Doesn't Get It: And finally, the league still
> insists on a two-week gap between the AFC/NFC Conference
> championships and the Super Bowl. Hopefully, the next NFL
> commissioner will end this stupid practice and play the Big
> Game one week after the conference championships.
> They get it, they just need a rest period.
> But then again, to reduce the gap from two weeks to one week
> would push the Super Bowl back into late January, prior to
> the start of the February sweeps. The networks (and their
> affiliates) aren't going to like that.
>
Who should get the super bowl in 2013 and 2014?
 
> Who should get the super bowl in 2013 and 2014?

The Fox, NBC, and CBS deals run through Super Bowl XLVI in late Jan/early Feb 2012, so it would depend on what happens with the next TV deal. If the same three networks wind up with that contract, Super Bowl XLVII in 2013 would be on CBS, while Super Bowl XLVIII in 2014 would be on Fox, assuming the pattern isn't broken or altered.

Betcha Super Bowl L in 2016 is gonna be a really big deal, celebrating a half-century of the game. CBS would be on track to run that one.

Speaking of 2014 & 2016 wonder who will have the Olympics (sites TBD) those years? The NBC deal goes through London in 2012.
 
Mediafrog comments:

> Betcha Super Bowl L in 2016 is gonna be a really big deal,
> celebrating a half-century of the game. CBS would be on
> track to run that one.

It might be logical, given that CBS broadcast Super Bowl I. But NBC also broadcast that game.

If that's the case, hopefully, Pat Summerall and Frank Gifford, who were part of CBS' broadcast team for Super Bowl I, will still be around and be able to contribute their memories of the first Super Sunday in a segment on the pregame show about that first Big Game.

However, don't look for Super Bowl L to be played in the Los Angeles Coliseum, (venue of Super Bowl I) unless the league again has a team in L.A. by then, since the NFL has never played a Super Bowl in a metropolitan area that doesn't have an NFL team. Yes, the NFL has played Super Bowls in stadiums that aren't home to NFL teams, but they are in metropolitan areas (i.e. Stanford Stadium in Palo Alto, near San Francisco/Oakland) that do have NFL teams.
 
> However, don't look for Super Bowl L to be played in the Los
> Angeles Coliseum, (venue of Super Bowl I) unless the league
> again has a team in L.A. by then, since the NFL has never
> played a Super Bowl in a metropolitan area that doesn't have
> an NFL team. Yes, the NFL has played Super Bowls in stadiums
> that aren't home to NFL teams, but they are in metropolitan
> areas (i.e. Stanford Stadium in Palo Alto, near San
> Francisco/Oakland) that do have NFL teams.
>

Stanford Stadium hosted SB XIX. And don't forget Houston's Rice Stadium (SB VIII) and Pasadena's Rose Bowl (SB's XI, XIV, XVII, XXI and XXVII), a site long associated with college football although (please correct me) no school used it as its home field until UCLA moved there from the Coliseum some 20 years ago. Don Weiss's "The Making of the Super Bowl" states that Rozelle originally considered the Rose Bowl as the site of SB I but the Pasadena city fathers said no.

Hasn't the NFL said that, should it return to L.A., it won't play in an unrenovated Rose Bowl or Coliseum? I think new stadia in Carson and Anaheim have been kicked around too.

Back closer to the topic... I get the NFL Network on my DirecTV right now. I wonder if we DirecTV customers will have to pay extra for it by the summer?

ixnay
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom