Carmine5 said:
ercjncpr said:
Carmine5 said:
Fascinating article on KIAH in Houston doing away with news anchors. I mention it here because KIAH is a Tribune station as is KTLA. Wonder if Tribune will implement this idea here in L.A.
http://www.tvnewscheck.com/article/2011/03/14/49774/kiah-set-to-launch-anchorless-newscast
TV news needs live reporters and a desk anchor who can pull the broadcast together into a cohesive whole. This idea will only make television news seem even more irrelevant and unnecessary. A better approach, if cost savings is the issue, is to pool talent from another broadcast or media entity and do a shared newsroom. At least the news will be fresh and not hours old.
Right. I don't think "anchorless" news will catch on. If KIAH is recording all the story intros by the voiceover guy earlier in the day, they'd have to break the format for live breaking news - just throw it to an in-studio reporter or the field reporter. Or if they're keeping the voice-over guy around the studio for live breaking news during the broadcast, how much money can they be saving?
I guess some local DJ/voiceover talent would make less than a TV news anchor, but I would think it's a relative drop-in-the bucket for a large market news operation. At least where I live (SF Bay Area), all the "star" anchors with huge salaries are long gone. These days, when an anchor retires or leaves, they just 'promote' another anchor or reporter from the same station. I can't think of the last time any local station here brought in some expensive new face from another market...the late 1990s, I think.