We all know that local radio news has undergone a lot of downsizing. That's gotten a lot of attention. What may have flown under the radar is the diminishing skill level of those who are still doing it.
Over on the Phoenix board there's discussion of a news anchor at a major talker who pronounced the word "female" to rhyme with TAMALE.
Brian Maloney has been calling out numerous faux pas on the outsourced news heard on WRKO. Some of them filtered through his ideology, others not (like reporting the Patriots lost a game they actually won).
From hearing the writing and voices of those who remain, I sense that radio increasingly is unable to attract anyone with a background in journalism and is down to converting board ops and anyone else they can into "newspeople" -- and probably without any training.
But in an era when energies are focused on syndicated talk and national politics, does the decline in local news quality have any effect whatsoever on the declining fortunes of radio stations -- especially news-talk?
Over on the Phoenix board there's discussion of a news anchor at a major talker who pronounced the word "female" to rhyme with TAMALE.
Brian Maloney has been calling out numerous faux pas on the outsourced news heard on WRKO. Some of them filtered through his ideology, others not (like reporting the Patriots lost a game they actually won).
From hearing the writing and voices of those who remain, I sense that radio increasingly is unable to attract anyone with a background in journalism and is down to converting board ops and anyone else they can into "newspeople" -- and probably without any training.
But in an era when energies are focused on syndicated talk and national politics, does the decline in local news quality have any effect whatsoever on the declining fortunes of radio stations -- especially news-talk?