formeraa said:But this might be good enough to have moderate success on daytime television.
TheBigA said:formeraa said:But this might be good enough to have moderate success on daytime television.
Daytime is very competitive. This is a high budget show done in NYC at a very expensive studio. Moderate success won't pay the bills.
radiojomo said:Here are some ratings news from the show's premiere
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/anderson-coopers-talk-show-has-234691
PTBoardOp94 said:Does this article imply that "Anderson" beat or tied "The View"? If Whoopi & Friends wasn't in the top 5, which gets down to a 1.3 rating, and "Anderson" was at 1.1, that seems likely unless Neilsen categorizes it in some other way.
radiojomo said:PTBoardOp94 said:Does this article imply that "Anderson" beat or tied "The View"? If Whoopi & Friends wasn't in the top 5, which gets down to a 1.3 rating, and "Anderson" was at 1.1, that seems likely unless Neilsen categorizes it in some other way.
I don't think The View is syndicated, I think they were publishing just syndicated numbers.
TheBigA said:The problem I see with him is that he's at his best outside the studio. When he's in a controlled environment reading a prepared script, he's no better than anyone else. What makes him sizzle is when he has to think on his feet and people are shooting at him. That's not going to happen in this kind of show, unless they think a little outside the studio box.
Not only that but I have to agree with the poster who said that Anderson is at his best when he's OUTSIDE the studio. Ed Schultz is the same way. He draws HUGE crowds when he takes to the roadTheBigA said:formeraa said:But this might be good enough to have moderate success on daytime television.
Daytime is very competitive. This is a high budget show done in NYC at a very expensive studio. Moderate success won't pay the bills.
Pat Cook said:Where in NYC is the studio for his show?