SUPERCASTER said:The HD cartel's new promo?
HD Radio - It's smokin'
Of course!!......It must be a reference to those power-hungry circuits in those HD radios overheating. ;D ;D ;D
SUPERCASTER said:The HD cartel's new promo?
HD Radio - It's smokin'
radio engineering is very fraternal, if this were an issue, no one, not even the "iboc powers that be" could "forcibly hush this bunch.
Cal Stymes said:LinoNYC observed:
radio engineering is very fraternal, if this were an issue, no one, not even the "iboc powers that be" could "forcibly hush this bunch.
...This is all about the public offering. This whole thing is about the public offering. There is too much at stake now and it MUST happen for iBiquity, otherwise, some people are going to be in an awful lot of financial trouble.
Follow the money.
Kelly said:Tom Wells said:And once again I say AM sounds wonderful.
The radios that the masses have accquired in the last 20 years,
along with the interference - spewing junk still somehow permitted in direct defiance of pt 15 unintentional radiator rules
have given people the impression that AM sounds bad. General Motors Deldo-Delphi is THE prominent perpetrator of this,
selling cars radios with the AM so gagged that it is often impossible to distinguish words clearly.
Even the nicest furniture in the world shows poorly in a pig-stye.
And it doesn't matter whether it's digital or analog furniture, it's going to get mud and pig-waste on it.
With so much RF interference being generated locally, few people are going have luck with AM HD.
The failure of the FCC to regulate the MW band's viablility by enforcing existing rules is THE reason AM is hampered.
A sane FCC would have not even permittted the mud-box Delcos to be built and sold to the public.
As unintelligible as they are, they are a public nuisance. They'd make good communications receivers for SW or MW dx if
they had proper front ends, which they don't, so they're not worth listening to.
I know when I have a GM rental car, I don't listen to AM. It's too maddening.
I dream of yanking the radio, and finding some way to shunt the dang ceramic filter with a cap.
If I do tune around and find a local so strong they "walk through" the MW tuner, they sound wonderful if you listen
50 khz or so off freq, because it gets around the 2.5 khz brickwall.
We need a board for "Let's get this mess cleaned up!", where RF interference could be reported, along with measures taken to
mitigate the noise. In fact there should be two such boards, one for in-home sources, and another for "external sources".
Interference made by man is preventable and curable.
I reject arguments that we should just live with it, and/or develop technologies creating EVEN more noise in an attempt to
shout over the noise. Even if you get it to work today, why would you think tomorrows noise is not going to be worse?
What will the be solution then? Another 10db of square wave noise? Isn't this already being suggested?
Where does this end?
More blame and discussion about the old days...great.
Tell you what Tom, go ask a 15 year old whether they care about AM radio. Better yet, ask them how it sounds, assuming they even know what AM radio is. As much as you would like to relive the past, they are the future.
If you're okay with allowing radio to just fade away like your memories of the "good ol' hi-fi days" of AM with 40% distortion, that's super. What a waste!
Tom Wells said:Regarding audio quality on AM analog:
tripinva- I have been posting podcasts of airchecks from m part 15 AM station in Chicago, W-nuthin-nuthin-nothin, 1620.
I have no NRSC cutoff since pt 15 doesn't require this. I transmit full audio, and when I test with material from an FM stereo source,
I can detect the 19 khz pilot in my audio by checking 20 khz up with a bfo, I hear the 1khz whistle.
This is by no means the best audio from an AM, but far better than most people get to hear.
I record to CD from the detector output of a 1980 vintage Sony AM/FM table radio.
This is sample #17.
http://thomasjwells.podOmatic.com/entry/2008-03-08T00_13_57-08_00