• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Another JFK Topic: The Day of the Funeral

Since we have been discussing TV coverage of JFK's assassination recently, let's fast-forward the tape a few days to the day of Kennedy's funeral, procession, and burial. If anyone can suggest sources (internet or otherwise) for accounts of the logistics of covering these events, please do so.

I imagine this may well have been the most ambitious live event ever covered on TV up to that time, and all of it had to be coordinated in less than 3 days. I wonder just how many cameras were used (and how many miles of cable!) to cover all the DC scenes, the slow solemn procession across the river, and the ceremonies at Arlington. While the networks had some resources locally (I assume all three had some sort of Washington bureau at the time), I wouldn't doubt that cameras, other equipment and personnel had to be "imported" for the occasion from affiliates all along the Eastern seaboard.

I would guess that, in spite of the availability of live mobile unit technology in 1963, many if not most of those cameras would have been hard-wired rather than microwaved to a central point. I can't imagine that they would have had the ability to handle more than one or two microwave links at one time. And though the action was spread out over a fairly wide geographic area, the pace of events was rather slow, so I wonder if some equipment set up to cover earlier stages of the day were then quickly "redeployed" to other sites?

And, given that the video portion of the broadcast was pooled among all three networks, who actually ran the show and called the shots that made it on the air? And how was he chosen? I wonder if there was some behind the scenes competition amongst the networks for that assignment -- after all, whoever directed that very historic broadcast would be acquiring quite a feather in his cap!

Thoughts? Guesses? References? Sources?
 
Thoughts and guesses only here...

TV news changed faster in those three days than ever in the history of the medium.It was almost as if, the discovery was made that TV news had a tremendous power, a power that previously had been underestimated.

24/7 coverage became a reality with this funeral. It wasn't used much again until the assasinations of '68, and really then not again until Nixon's resignation, and then not again until 9/11. Of course, I'm talking about major network here. Cable is a totally different animal, and IMHO, they have abused this over and over with CNN, Fox, MSNBC, etc. covering not-so-important stories as if they were the end of the world. (But they will proclaim that their ratings spike when they go wall-to-wall, despite the importance of the story. From a business standpoint, I guess I can't blame them. From an ethical standpoint, there is no excuse.)

Despite the relatively low occurances of these real important events, the technology jumped ahead in ways nobody could predict. Perhaps, due to the fear of such events happening again, and perhaps because this technology was usefull for more ordinary events, events that deserved immediate coverage, but for not any great length of time. Regardless, fascinating study of how TV news media has developed over the past 50 years. I find the whole subject quite interesting and should be an important part of the history of the electronic news media.
 
You may recall that CBS got caught with their pants completely down after Princess Diana's death. The newsroom was unstaffed early Sunday morning, and they ended up relaying Britain's ITN coverage.
 
A few days after the shooting and funeral, the Dick Van Dyke Show filmed and episode, and according to the cast, they were all numb and not into it.

It was the birthday party episode, and if you have seen it, you can certainly detect it in the actors.
 
Legend City said:
A few days after the shooting and funeral, the Dick Van dyke Show filmed and episode, and according to the cast, they were all numb and not into it.

It was the birthday party episode, and if you have seen it, you can certainly detect it in the actors.

I believe they also filmed that one without the usual live audience for the same reasons.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom