• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Another member of the conspiracy against reality...

Because no one could have a difference of opinion, right? Nahhhhh.....
 
I stopped reading the link when the writer claimed that they never tried to imply that HD stood
for high definition. What a bunch of bull. That is exactly what they tried to put in the mind of the
consumer. On many occasions they have said that radio transmission needs to move forward and
go digital like TV. What exactly were they trying to imply with that? If they were not trying to make
their system appear to be the same as HD TV than why did they use the HD name? Why not choose
another name? This guy is an HD hack and I didn't even need to read the whole piece to see that.
 
Haw haw haw!! :D HIGHLY entertaining.

Can't get reliable HD reception? Hey, it's YOUR fault for being too far from the transmitter! So I gather this Mensa Member prescribes wanna-listeners should tote lawn chairs down to the Tx site and camp out on the ground screen?

Is there interference? Just to "small stations." HD has this remarkable engineering development which discerns which stations are "small" and which stations are "large," with the latter being equipped with a special immuno-enhancing HD defense-carrier generator thingy. This anti-interference guard is unavailable to stations with less than 10kw or which are not owned by Alliance members. :D

"Someone is always suing someone for something." Oh, I get it. Because there are a lot of lawsuits, none of them have any merit. Hey, have it your way: if there's no case here, the suit will fail. But - if you look at five years of experience with HD Radio in the field with a plethora of complaints and problems documented all over this board and other, in industry publications, FCC enforcement bureau filings, and so forth.....I wouldn't bet on this suit getting tossed. But, hey, thanks for coming to the track....pick the horse YOU like.

Hair's right. The guy is just another HD apologist. One of about fifteen left these days.
 
>Hair's right. The guy is just another HD apologist. One of about fifteen left these days.

Dave's a good man who is trying to protect the scarcity of broadcast channels against commodification and the digital onslaught by those outside the traditional broadcast industry. That's his objective, I believe, more than any particular fondness for HDR. It's a losing cause long term; but it's also rational and smart to try and keep the old game going long enough to assure a dignified retirement.

A hint, gentlemen: real names are demanded over there, while screen names are accepted over here.
 
Don Juannn said:
Because no one could have a difference of opinion, right? Nahhhhh.....

Hey, Don's Back! And with TWO MORE nns. What's that all about? Oh, Right.

Wonder if he can hear the increased multipath noise intrusions yet?

http://www.rwonline.com/usercontrol/article/105256

From the Chief Scientist at Continental, no less.
 
I'm sure most, if not all, at Continental, BE, Harris, and Nautel know that the HD equipment they're peddling is based on iBiquity junk science. Most engineering types know Kool-Aid when they see it. Unfortunately they have to play the hand they're dealt; they're just trying to make a living.
 
Absolutely, LO. I'm sure you've done what I have on numerous occasions over the past five years - which is, a one-on-one quiet face-to-face with a sales engineer. I haven't spoken to a single one who thinks HD is a valid, much less a great, idea. After a handful of initial sales, they pretty much hate it, because it creates perennial problems.

They roll their eyes and say, the Home Office makes us sell this stuff. It's crap. Every gear manufacturer has a support department where the engineers do nothing but deal with incessant problems, complaints and issues about HD. The system generates more grief than every other product the companies sell put together. And half the time the problems originate with iBiquity, not the transmitter makers, so the poor station engineers get bounced back and forth between the parties as the manufacturers and iBiquity blame each other for problems.

Sales engineers will also tell you, in an unguarded moment, they haven't sold appreciable HD stuff in months if not years.
 
dumber than a box of hair said:
Don Juannn said:
Because no one could have a difference of opinion, right? Nahhhhh.....

Hey...everyone's entitled to their own delusions...

Sound like the pastor in Florida.

I know whats best...and everyone else is wrong.
 
Don Juannn said:
Tom Wells said:
Don Juannn said:
Because no one could have a difference of opinion, right? Nahhhhh.....

Wonder if he can hear the increased multipath noise intrusions yet?
http://www.rwonline.com/usercontrol/article/105256
From the Chief Scientist at Continental, no less.

Hey, I think there's an old tube set that picks up morse code you can busy yourself with. ;-)


I made out just enough copy to tell it's from a United Fruit Company bannana boat in distress.
They need a tow, but I couldn't make out the coordinates.

Boy, somebody must have realy cranked down on them trimmer screws...that wasn't you was it?
Just because those screws aren't "tight" doesn't mean they needed "tightnening".
Tell your kids to stop poking around in the back of radios, OK?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom