• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

any new rumors/truth to 1620 AM's WHLY future format???

C

cartleague

Guest
Anyone know of any new good rumors/truth reguarding 1620 AM WHLY? Website still shows Radio Hollywood and has yet to be changed, yet they still are using U93 on it.
 
> yet they still are using U93 on it.

Still a U-93 simulcast this morning, as they're playing Natasha Bedingfield's "Unwritten," which never sounded better on AM Radio. I have heard about the future of 1620, but must keep my mouth shut. Now they're playing Stefani's Hollaback Girl.

AS
 
Ok Art, I understand. The only true thing that I know about 1620 is that a new transmitter will be up and running (there is a CP for it on FCC page). Other than that, I guess the rest of the list that cares will have to plead & beg it out of you. lol

Keith

> > yet they still are using U93 on it.
>
> Still a U-93 simulcast this morning, as they're playing
> Natasha Bedingfield's "Unwritten," which never sounded
> better on AM Radio. I have heard about the future of 1620,
> but must keep my mouth shut. Now they're playing Stefani's
> Hollaback Girl.
>
> AS
>
 
> > yet they still are using U93 on it.
>
>
> better on AM Radio. I have heard about the future of 1620,
> but must keep my mouth shut. Now they're playing Stefani's
>

as long as AMP is in control there is no future.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom