• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Any One else hate the "seek" button

E

eyg2181

Guest
I Hate This Button With A Passion, It Always Skips Stations That Come In, for example, the ST light was on for WMMR in Pottsville and the seek button skips that and stops at a channel with the light blinking on and off, and with a lot of static, when MMR was Clear...I have always used the auto tune to tune them in myself because SEEK SUCKS!
 
The "seek" button, along with "step tuning" was the worst "improvement" radio ever received.
Instead of "listening" while tuning, we now let a "voltage discriminator" decide whether we want to hear a station.
And as you describe, It IS stupid.
Tuning manually since these "advancements" is slow and deliberate, and hampers listeners from "looking around".

Compare an AM bandscan top-to-bottom with an analog tuner (listening for interest) to the same with a digital tuner.
I bet such a scan takes 3 or 4 times longer with the step-wait-listen process.

And why does there need to be ANY delay before audio? The step-wait-listen cycle is much shorter for FM on most radios,
on the AM it is maddening. I remember one or two car radios (aftermarket)with digital readouts which tuned continuously
and displayed AM tuning by 1khz steps. Ahhh, if only that had become the standard!

Far better was the old "magic tuning" 1960's car radios with analog pointers, and a "country" or "city" seek button.
A real bear to fix, but the sensitivity!
Of course, these were mono FM, but many stations at that time were only horizontally polarized, so vertical FM masts were at a disadvantage.
 
Not big on presets myself, seems you miss out on some lowered powered stations that are still strong enough to listen to.
 
i like my presets, i hate the seek button...i like auto tune...seek just stops at stationbs that are clear...but skips some that are clear enough to listen to


vibe said:
Not big on presets myself, seems you miss out on some lowered powered stations that are still strong enough to listen to.
 
I almost never use the seek button, and I agree that it skips over stations that are listenable. I usually go step by step manually and have what I call a floating preset that I use to temporarily keep a station in for short periods on each band.
 
I will never use seek while driving and listening to FM...the drift and multipath make it useless on fm...I'll only use it from time to time on AM in the day. I always tune manually on my walkman, although it's seek function is really go0d...I prefer to see what's between the strong stations
 
If only the seek funtion had an adjustable threshold, there would be no issue here.
It could have been done, but cheapness rules, and while lots of other fluff features get added, this stays non-adjustable.

For the same reason most AM radios ought to have variable bandwidth, but mfrs won't add adjustments the average public can't understand.

And yet cellphones have 175 features and screen settings...go figger.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom