• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Anyone Else Notice BBT Becoming More Like 2 1/2?

BBT used to be much more neerdy than the past few shows. Now we get personal relationships, including Penny dating the rest of the cast in turn, instead of hilarious topics like the String Theory.

It is nice that Howard and Raj have finally been given more camera time since both are funny in their own right but....

Given that "2 1/2" has dropped-through-the-floor in its humorous attempts at the integration of Kutcher, maybe the writer pool is instead focusing upon BBT?

Jus' wonderin'. ???
 
I don't think "BBT" has become more like "Two and a Half Men". If anything, they have taken a page out of the "Friends" playbook and made this much more of an ensemble. The addition of two stronger female characters in Bernadette and Amy has taken the female comedic load off of Penny- and the writing seems to reflect a more balanced approach, where not every story or every arc has to be Leonard or Sheldon-centric.

Personally, I think the show is strongest when it incorporates all six of the characters, like in last season's episode when they all road trip to Santa Barbara to attend a speaking series that they've been invited to.

Also, I think the introduction of Amy Farrah Fowler has been the best thing to happen to a traditional multi camera sitcom in a long time. Its actually nice to see that this artform isn't dying- because single camera seemed to rule the roost, even if the laughs are of a different variety.
 
justpassingthough said:
Personally, I think the show is strongest when it incorporates all six of the characters, like in last season's episode when they all road trip to Santa Barbara to attend a speaking series that they've been invited to.
.

Probably the best episode theyve ever done
 
Good insight justpassingthrough but....

I don't remember the early shows, which were in fact centered around Sheldon, having everyone hopping in and out of bed ala "2 1/2". Not that some of these situations were not funny because some were, but it seems to have taken the original name and environment into a new direction. Even Amy Farrah Fowler (who has become a real hoot) is partaking in the sexual innuendo with Shelly.

I didn't mean my post as a criticism of the show because I still enjoy it. I just was a bit surprised at the turn of events.
 
The writing is having issues lately. The problem with such a large and talented cast is giving everyone enough screen time.

This was seen last season on an episode dedicated largely to Bernadette, Penny and Amy. The three woman were just as funny as the guys and you barely missed them.

The writers are starting to box themselves in. Howard was hysterical as an obnoxious womanizer. Howard is much more likable now with Bernadette, but not nearly as funny.

Raj not being able to talk to women, except when drunk is old. C'mon there's dozens of medicines available for social anxiety, and he's a scientist. He should be over this.

Sheldon is funny but only when the writers are careful to play him off Penny. Otherwise he comes off rude to his friends. Oddly enough only his mother, sister and Leslie Winkle have ever been able to put Sheldon in his place and make him act like a normal human.

Lastly the cast is getting old. Things that are funny when you're 28 are not funny when you're pushing 40 as what happened on "Friends."

Jim Parsons is 12 years older than Kaley Cuoco and Johnny Galecki is ten years older than her. When the show started it wasn't too bad. Now Parsons especially, looks really old when he's standing next to her. I am assuming all the guys are supposed to be roughly the same age. Parsons and Galecki are showing their age. It can't be helped, but it's noticeable now.

"Two And A Half Men" started out as a star driven vehicle and quickly became more of an ensemble cast. But what I don't like is Alan was always a moocher and cheap. This was funny because Charlie was his brother. Now with the Kutcher character, Alan has gone from funny moocher to pathetic, loser, con artist, taking advantage of a rich guy.
 
"2 1/2" had ONE big laugh tonight - and the kid got it.

Courtney (giving Jake a hug): "Hi Jake. You have grown."

Jake: "Naw. That's just my cell phone."
 
Incidentally, it won't be long before people are asking, "What's 2 1/2"?
 
DToTheJ said:
Incidentally, it won't be long before people are asking, "What's 2 1/2"?

I actually think 2 1/2 is great this year. I thought it would be a bust with Charlie gone, but I still find myself literally laughing out loud. (example: Jake's cell phone comment, mentioned above)
 
Mark said:
Raj not being able to talk to women, except when drunk is old. C'mon there's dozens of medicines available for social anxiety, and he's a scientist. He should be over this.

But expecting Raj to not be able to talk to women is what makes this ongoing joke funny. Having the guy pop a Prozac doesn't really have the same effect...
 
Part of the allure of this show in the beginning was that it was smart comedy for smart people. The scene where the guys were figuring out the logistics of going out to eat and to a movie was hilarious. (They were working out formulas with markers on a large tablet set up on an easel) The science references really set the show apart from so many hokey, dopey sitcoms.

I hope they don't lose their way by going too far into relationships and bodily function jokes, although that's not to say that it can't be done. I just hope they don't lose their way, forget what was so appealing about the show in the first place and turn into just another sitcom.
 
Al Timiter said:
Part of the allure of this show in the beginning was that it was smart comedy for smart people. The scene where the guys were figuring out the logistics of going out to eat and to a movie was hilarious. (They were working out formulas with markers on a large tablet set up on an easel) The science references really set the show apart from so many hokey, dopey sitcoms.

I hope they don't lose their way by going too far into relationships and bodily function jokes, although that's not to say that it can't be done. I just hope they don't lose their way, forget what was so appealing about the show in the first place and turn into just another sitcom.

The show has ALWAYS tried to balance nerd-humor and relationship type humor. That is why it can appeal to the masses, but still get that "smart comedy" label. And while I will agree they have moved slightly away from the "scientific" side of things, they are still staying VERY analytic in their humor. An example being the paintball episode, where Sheldon had marked up a Google Map, or Amy psychoanalyzing Sheldon "Your repetitive knocking is a sign of OCD" "Is not.....is not is not"

And while Howard has lost some of his "creepy pervert" personality, he's more than made up with "creepy relationship with mother" which is increasingly hilarious. I think the show is evolving quite nicely, actually.
 
landtuna said:
"2 1/2" had ONE big laugh tonight - and the kid got it.

Courtney (giving Jake a hug): "Hi Jake. You have grown."

Jake: "Naw. That's just my cell phone."
I gotta disagree on that being a big laugh because that joke's been around since before Shakespeare (not with the cell phone though), but to each his own.... ;)
 
quadraphonic said:
landtuna said:
"2 1/2" had ONE big laugh tonight - and the kid got it.

Courtney (giving Jake a hug): "Hi Jake. You have grown."

Jake: "Naw. That's just my cell phone."
I gotta disagree on that being a big laugh because that joke's been around since before Shakespeare (not with the cell phone though), but to each his own.... ;)

My point wasn't that the joke was new, it wasn't, but rather that it was the ONLY funny bit on the show.
 
quadraphonic said:
landtuna said:
"2 1/2" had ONE big laugh tonight - and the kid got it.

Courtney (giving Jake a hug): "Hi Jake. You have grown."

Jake: "Naw. That's just my cell phone."
I gotta disagree on that being a big laugh because that joke's been around since before Shakespeare (not with the cell phone though), but to each his own.... ;)

TRIVIA:
Legend had it that Mae West said; "Is that a ____ in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?" The ____ was either "banana" or "gun" depending upon who was repeating the story.

Apparently though, she never uttered that sentence unil her last film - Sextette in 1978, decades after the legend had been established.
 
landtuna said:
My point wasn't that the joke was new, it wasn't, but rather that it was the ONLY funny bit on the show.

I actually thought it was hilarious when Berta's boyfriend came out of the bathroom in a towel looking for a plunger. The scene was so absurd. But this is what makes comedy so difficult to program - everyone's tastes in humor are very unique so it's very hard to appeal to everyone.
 
justpassingthough said:
Amy Farrah Fowler has been the best thing to happen to a traditional multi camera sitcom in a long time. Its actually nice to see that this artform isn't dying- because single camera seemed to rule the roost, even if the laughs are of a different variety.
Amy has been a valuable addition to this show. But a few weeks ago she smiled too much. She's better if she doesn't smile.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom