• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Anyone here with Rock 108 Waterloo?

Hello everyone.

Lately, I've had an appetite for hearing a station with an Active Rock format, and IMHO, the BEST station with that format is KFMW Rock 108 in Waterloo.

However, I don't think they're streaming their signal.

Is anyone here on the Iowa board with Rock 108?

If so, I'd LOVE to see Rock 108 made available online, so that I don't have to wait until my family and I travel to Eastern Iowa or the Chicago area to hear this WONDERFUL station!! :)

Anyone here with Rock 108?

If so, are there any plans for them to stream their signal online in the future?

DeanSB<P ID="signature">______________
Dance Music RULEZ!! :)</P>
 
E-mail Michael Cross at "[email protected]" I am pretty sure he is the one calling the shots around that place, but don't get your hopes up. They are owned by Bahakel. KFMW is definitely an excellent small market rock station. Cross has a good rep in the Active Rock genre.

> Hello everyone.
>
> Lately, I've had an appetite for hearing a station with an
> Active Rock format, and IMHO, the BEST station with that
> format is KFMW Rock 108 in Waterloo.
>
> However, I don't think they're streaming their signal.
>
> Is anyone here on the Iowa board with Rock 108?
>
> If so, I'd LOVE to see Rock 108 made available online, so
> that I don't have to wait until my family and I travel to
> Eastern Iowa or the Chicago area to hear this WONDERFUL
> station!! :)
>
> Anyone here with Rock 108?
>
> If so, are there any plans for them to stream their signal
> online in the future?
>
> DeanSB
>
 
First off, thanks much for the kudos. Usually this isn't the place to read positive comments, so that was a nice surprise.

Secondly, (in regards to the follow up post) while we are indeed owned by Bahakel, I couldn't be happier that we are. It's probably also another reason we do get the respect we do in the business. Being independent and not owned by a huge company is also the main reason Rock 108 can play the music it does freely. There's no one above to tell us what we can or cannot play. Freedom in radio programming in the year 2005 is an extremely rare thing and one that I am thankful for every single day.

Thirdly, from what I understand, it costs approximately $12k a year to stream audio on the Internet and it's just not in the budget to do so at this time. Believe me, I wish it was. I'd love to be heard worldwide, but for now, half of Iowa, parts of Wisconsin, Minnesota and Illinois will have to do!

Thanks for the nice words. All of us appreciate that.


Michael Cross
Operations Manager
KFMW-FM / KOKZ-FM
Waterloo - Cedar Rapids




> Hello everyone.
>
> Lately, I've had an appetite for hearing a station with an
> Active Rock format, and IMHO, the BEST station with that
> format is KFMW Rock 108 in Waterloo.
>
> However, I don't think they're streaming their signal.
>
> Is anyone here on the Iowa board with Rock 108?
>
> If so, I'd LOVE to see Rock 108 made available online, so
> that I don't have to wait until my family and I travel to
> Eastern Iowa or the Chicago area to hear this WONDERFUL
> station!! :)
>
> Anyone here with Rock 108?
>
> If so, are there any plans for them to stream their signal
> online in the future?
>
> DeanSB
>
 
Rock 108 may be excellent in Waterloo, but KRNA is most excellent
in Cedar Rapids/Iowa City. Huge Spring book. Even Norton would be proud.
Killer Morning Show and researched music just plain wins...indie, corporate or otherwise.

> E-mail Michael Cross at "[email protected]" I am pretty
> sure he is the one calling the shots around that place, but
> don't get your hopes up. They are owned by Bahakel. KFMW is
> definitely an excellent small market rock station. Cross has
> a good rep in the Active Rock genre.
>
> > Hello everyone.
> >
> > Lately, I've had an appetite for hearing a station with an
>
> > Active Rock format, and IMHO, the BEST station with that
> > format is KFMW Rock 108 in Waterloo.
> >
> > However, I don't think they're streaming their signal.
> >
> > Is anyone here on the Iowa board with Rock 108?
> >
> > If so, I'd LOVE to see Rock 108 made available online, so
> > that I don't have to wait until my family and I travel to
> > Eastern Iowa or the Chicago area to hear this WONDERFUL
> > station!! :)
> >
> > Anyone here with Rock 108?
> >
> > If so, are there any plans for them to stream their signal
>
> > online in the future?
> >
> > DeanSB
> >
>
 
For you to make such a statement it's clear that either you work for them or you don't know what the hell you're talking about. The man said he likes listening to active rock & despite KRNA's hype, they still have a long way to go before anyone can take them seriously! Especially after only 1 book for christ's sake that certainly wasn't "huge" & only served to show just how far the station has fallen. I mean if it wasn't for KFMW, just what would KRNA have copied from station features to talent anyway? Also, if they're so "excellent" in Cedar Rapids, why is KFMW so dominate in bringing so many shows here to 3rd Street & to Hawkeye Downs? Seriously dude...get a grip!
 
> For you to make such a statement it's clear that either you
> work for them or you don't know what the hell you're talking
> about. The man said he likes listening to active rock &
> despite KRNA's hype, they still have a long way to go before
> anyone can take them seriously! Especially after only 1 book
> for christ's sake that certainly wasn't "huge" & only served
> to show just how far the station has fallen. I mean if it
> wasn't for KFMW, just what would KRNA have copied from
> station features to talent anyway? Also, if they're so
> "excellent" in Cedar Rapids, why is KFMW so dominate in
> bringing so many shows here to 3rd Street & to Hawkeye
> Downs? Seriously dude...get a grip!
>

Hold on a sec, first Michael Cross says that stations that are corporate owned (KRNA included) don't have the freedom to do what they want. And now "Joe6Pack" says KRNA is "copying" KFMW? Which is it?? If you ask me, neither station invented the Rock format and everyone "copies" everyone. And as for your comment about KFMW "dominating by bringing in shows to 3rd Street, etc..."..I know those who have brought in those shows, and KFMW hasn't paid A DIME to do that. So it's the promoters that bring in the shows and then choose KFMW to promote them. Which, by the turnout at Tuesday night's Ill Nino show in Cedar Rapids (of which I was in attendance) of MAYBE 100 people might not be the best thing to do. Being successful in a market has to do with revenue and ratings - last I checked - not who is the welcoming station for a band. Just a few thoughts.
 
As much as I hate getting involved with conversations on this board, I'll go ahead and set myself up for some comments with a reply to this recent post...

For one, "Michael Cross" doesn't claim that stations that are corporate owned do not have the freedom to be musically aggressive. It's a proven fact. Check out www.radioandrecords.com and call up any Clear Channel or Cumulus station's playlist and compare it to KFMW's. Having been in broadcasting for 25 years, I do know a little bit about this business and I also know from working for corporations and 'mom & pops' that there is a huge difference. I don't have corporate PD's or consultants telling me what to play. They do.

In regards to KFMW's sponsorship of concerts in Cedar Rapids, anyone who's on this board is probably either in radio or unemployed and bitter about not being in radio, which means we should all know how concerts work. Unless you are in a medium or major market, odds are good that you aren't spending the money to bring in concerts. Not many stations have the $100,000 it would cost to bring in a national act with support, security, hotels, lights, meals, sound and everything included.

If you don't know how the "Presents" thing works at concerts and you're in radio, then you need to brush up on your knowledge of radio broadcasting. That being said, we also don't make the decisions to bring in certain bands at certain clubs on certain nights. That's all done by the promoter and the club. However, Rock 108 plays Ill Nino and as far as I know, KRNA does not. So, to use KFMW in this case was obvious. However, we did not think bringing in Ill Nino on a Tuesday night with a record that isn't selling was a very good idea.

If a club wishes to bring in a band and chooses Rock 108 to promote the show, then we do the best we can do to help the club have a successful night. If the club doesn't have a successful night, then there are reasons why. Blame the ticket price or whatever, but it's tough to blame the radio station who's playing the band, running the spots, giving away the tickets and holding a live remote. Ill Nino was thrilled with us regardless of the poor turnout.

In regards to the last line of your post of defining success in a market, we are the only FM rock station in Iowa that pulls Arbitron numbers in Mason City, Dubuque, Cedar Rapids and Waterloo/Cedar Falls. With those kinds of numbers, I'd say Rock 108 is more than successful, book after book, year after year - without one single format change in almost 6 straight years. How many rock stations can make that claim?

None.


Michael Cross
OM/PD
KFMW-FM
Waterloo/Cedar Rapids
319-234-2200



> Hold on a sec, first Michael Cross says that stations that
> are corporate owned (KRNA included) don't have the freedom
> to do what they want. And now "Joe6Pack" says KRNA is
> "copying" KFMW? Which is it?? If you ask me, neither
> station invented the Rock format and everyone "copies"
> everyone. And as for your comment about KFMW "dominating by
> bringing in shows to 3rd Street, etc..."..I know those who
> have brought in those shows, and KFMW hasn't paid A DIME to
> do that. So it's the promoters that bring in the shows and
> then choose KFMW to promote them. Which, by the turnout at
> Tuesday night's Ill Nino show in Cedar Rapids (of which I
> was in attendance) of MAYBE 100 people might not be the best
> thing to do. Being successful in a market has to do with
> revenue and ratings - last I checked - not who is the
> welcoming station for a band. Just a few thoughts.
>
 
I LOVE it how some people say "I hate posting on this board" - and then go on to write a small thesis on what they feel is right or wrong with other's posts. That being said, and even though Michael Cross begrudgingly posted the first time - SIX PARAGRAPHS WORTH - I do have some questions to his post and hope he can answer.

1. Since when does being "agressive" mean being successful? With the flip-flopping of KRNA over the past several years (rock to classic rock now back to rock) what station wouldn't be successful? I know it's only been a year (2 ratings periods I believe), but KFMW and KRNA have basically switched positions 12+ in CR...with KFMW now at the bottom and KRNA now back up in the top 5. I would love to know if Michael Cross attributes that swing to a "glitch" in the ratings system. Or...is it now that he has competition (albeit it a "restricted, corporate constricted station") why isn't that "aggressive" approach showing positive results in Cedar Rapids?

2. If a station, say for example the afore-metioned "renegade" KFMW, doesn't think bringing a band like Il Nino into Cedar Rapids for a Tuesday night concert is a good idea - why be associated with it at all?? Why not say "we'll pass on this one"? Why hold a LIVE REMOTE? Your comments that your radio station "can't be held responsible" if they are "playing the band, giving away the tickets, etc...." is ridiculous.

Let me make this simple for you. If I'm a business, and the only form of advertising I choose to use is your radio station to PROMOTE my business. And I have you give away my product (ie - tickets), and talk about my business, and run commercials for my business and NO ONE SHOWS UP TO MY BUSINESS...I, as that business owner would say "using that radio station did NOTHING for me." And...if said radio station supposedly had a listener base that was into my product I was selling (ie - a band like Il Nino)..and was THE ONLY station that played that artist...and no one showed up...I would have to lay a nice sized chunk of blame on that radio station. Isn't that the station's goal "to bring people to the show"?? How can you say "we promoted it, we ran the commercials for it, we showed up and did a live broadcast...but we wash our hands of the fact that no one was there." To me...that's VERY near-sighted and VERY irresponsible. If there had been 1,000 people at the show...would you also have said you had "nothing to do with the turnout?" Remember...you cannot take the accolades if you do not take the criticism.

3. Since when does "pulling numbers" in four markets make you a successful station? Doesn't that just mean you have a big stick with a lot of wattage behind it??? Sure I'd tell people if I were working for a station that was heard in half the state. However, I don't think I'd associate that with being successful. There's a difference between being top rated and just having "ratings".


> As much as I hate getting involved with conversations on
> this board, I'll go ahead and set myself up for some
> comments with a reply to this recent post...
>
> For one, "Michael Cross" doesn't claim that stations that
> are corporate owned do not have the freedom to be musically
> aggressive. It's a proven fact. Check out
> www.radioandrecords.com and call up any Clear Channel or
> Cumulus station's playlist and compare it to KFMW's. Having
> been in broadcasting for 25 years, I do know a little bit
> about this business and I also know from working for
> corporations and 'mom & pops' that there is a huge
> difference. I don't have corporate PD's or consultants
> telling me what to play. They do.
>
> In regards to KFMW's sponsorship of concerts in Cedar
> Rapids, anyone who's on this board is probably either in
> radio or unemployed and bitter about not being in radio,
> which means we should all know how concerts work. Unless you
> are in a medium or major market, odds are good that you
> aren't spending the money to bring in concerts. Not many
> stations have the $100,000 it would cost to bring in a
> national act with support, security, hotels, lights, meals,
> sound and everything included.
>
> If you don't know how the "Presents" thing works at concerts
> and you're in radio, then you need to brush up on your
> knowledge of radio broadcasting. That being said, we also
> don't make the decisions to bring in certain bands at
> certain clubs on certain nights. That's all done by the
> promoter and the club. However, Rock 108 plays Ill Nino and
> as far as I know, KRNA does not. So, to use KFMW in this
> case was obvious. However, we did not think bringing in Ill
> Nino on a Tuesday night with a record that isn't selling was
> a very good idea.
>
> If a club wishes to bring in a band and chooses Rock 108 to
> promote the show, then we do the best we can do to help the
> club have a successful night. If the club doesn't have a
> successful night, then there are reasons why. Blame the
> ticket price or whatever, but it's tough to blame the radio
> station who's playing the band, running the spots, giving
> away the tickets and holding a live remote. Ill Nino was
> thrilled with us regardless of the poor turnout.
>
> In regards to the last line of your post of defining success
> in a market, we are the only FM rock station in Iowa that
> pulls Arbitron numbers in Mason City, Dubuque, Cedar Rapids
> and Waterloo/Cedar Falls. With those kinds of numbers, I'd
> say Rock 108 is more than successful, book after book, year
> after year - without one single format change in almost 6
> straight years. How many rock stations can make that claim?
>
> None.
>
>
> Michael Cross
> OM/PD
> KFMW-FM
> Waterloo/Cedar Rapids
> 319-234-2200
>
>
>
> > Hold on a sec, first Michael Cross says that stations that
>
> > are corporate owned (KRNA included) don't have the freedom
>
> > to do what they want. And now "Joe6Pack" says KRNA is
> > "copying" KFMW? Which is it?? If you ask me, neither
> > station invented the Rock format and everyone "copies"
> > everyone. And as for your comment about KFMW "dominating
> by
> > bringing in shows to 3rd Street, etc..."..I know those who
>
> > have brought in those shows, and KFMW hasn't paid A DIME
> to
> > do that. So it's the promoters that bring in the shows
> and
> > then choose KFMW to promote them. Which, by the turnout
> at
> > Tuesday night's Ill Nino show in Cedar Rapids (of which I
> > was in attendance) of MAYBE 100 people might not be the
> best
> > thing to do. Being successful in a market has to do with
> > revenue and ratings - last I checked - not who is the
> > welcoming station for a band. Just a few thoughts.
> >
>
 
> As much as I hate getting involved with conversations on
> this board, I'll go ahead and set myself up for some
> comments with a reply to this recent post...
>
> For one, "Michael Cross" doesn't claim that stations that
> are corporate owned do not have the freedom to be musically
> aggressive. It's a proven fact. Check out
> www.radioandrecords.com and call up any Clear Channel or
> Cumulus station's playlist and compare it to KFMW's. Having
> been in broadcasting for 25 years, I do know a little bit
> about this business and I also know from working for
> corporations and 'mom & pops' that there is a huge
> difference. I don't have corporate PD's or consultants
> telling me what to play. They do.

Michael-

I just took a Clear Channel rock station up 13 shares. Nobody told ME what to play!

(Setting the record straight...)
 
Stickman, do you work at KRNA? Your so worried about (BLEEP) that doesn't concern you. However, I'll sucker in and reply.

Listen, so the Ill Nino show bombed. I'll take ALL the responsibility. Okay? Better? We should have played Ill Nino 100 times a week and given away 1000 tickets to ensure that there would be people there. Does that make it right for you now? I don't know why you are choosing to pick on KFMW over one show. Why aren't you talking about all of the other shows KFMW has been associated with this year that KRNA was not? I don't hear you complain about any other show KFMW "presented" - especially Rockstock on Labor Day weekend. One show that didn't do well out of the 15 we sponsored in 2005? I'll take those odds. I wasn't skirting responsibility for the failure of the Ill Nino show. It simply didn't do well, but I can guarantee that if KRNA had sponsored the show, the result would have been the same. It has nothing to do with WHO sponsored the show.

Being musically aggressive doesn't mean success whatsoever and your putting words in my mouth because I didn't say that it did. If you can't handle or accept the fact that KFMW is a successful rock station, then I can't do much about that. Success means making money and having the numbers to back that up to an advertiser. KFMW has had both of those stats for a number of years. If a radio station isn't making money and is flipping formats every couple of books, that would indicate failure....KFMW hasn't changed format in years and the last time we tweaked the format was March 2000....I believe that's almost 6 years ago?

There was no "ratings glitch" in Cedar Rapids. KFMW had never beat KRNA (12+) in Cedar Rapids before, and obviously the programming that was on KRNA wasn't appealing to the demo and they flipped to KFMW. Pretty simple. If KRNA is beating KFMW from now on, then I guess that would be pretty normal for the market. However, I should also point out that KRNA didn't even show in the Waterloo Arbitron...and that's the first time that has happened in the 8 years I've been here. Is that a "ratings glitch" too? I should also point out that you are only talking 12+ numbers...do you want to go over the target demos, or do you not have access to those? With our target demo, Men 18-34, Rock 108 is still ranked #1 in Cedar Rapids in afternoon drive and nights.

I shouldn't have to educate you Stickman, seeing as how you seem to also have all the answers, but pulling numbers in 4 markets indicates people enjoy listening to the station. If the station sucks, people aren't going to listen (see KRNA's 2.5 share in Cedar Rapids a couple of books ago as an example). KRNA is a much better rock station now than 2 years ago and the numbers back that up. I am fine with KRNA and their success. It looks as if your the one who's so upset by this. Hell, up until recently, 3 out of their 5 on-air jocks were former KFMW jocks. It indicates that whatever they are doing is working and I can't say that I'm upset by that, it means Active Rock is a healthy format. It also vindicates what Rock 108 has been doing for almost 6 straight years.

Happy Holidays. May you be a little less angry and overwelmed by Rock 108's success. There's bigger things in life to get so upset about.



Michael Cross
OM/PD
KFMW-FM






> I LOVE it how some people say "I hate posting on this board"
> - and then go on to write a small thesis on what they feel
> is right or wrong with other's posts. That being said, and
> even though Michael Cross begrudgingly posted the first time
> - SIX PARAGRAPHS WORTH - I do have some questions to his
> post and hope he can answer.
>
> 1. Since when does being "agressive" mean being successful?
> With the flip-flopping of KRNA over the past several years
> (rock to classic rock now back to rock) what station
> wouldn't be successful? I know it's only been a year (2
> ratings periods I believe), but KFMW and KRNA have basically
> switched positions 12+ in CR...with KFMW now at the bottom
> and KRNA now back up in the top 5. I would love to know if
> Michael Cross attributes that swing to a "glitch" in the
> ratings system. Or...is it now that he has competition
> (albeit it a "restricted, corporate constricted station")
> why isn't that "aggressive" approach showing positive
> results in Cedar Rapids?
>
> 2. If a station, say for example the afore-metioned
> "renegade" KFMW, doesn't think bringing a band like Il Nino
> into Cedar Rapids for a Tuesday night concert is a good idea
> - why be associated with it at all?? Why not say "we'll
> pass on this one"? Why hold a LIVE REMOTE? Your comments
> that your radio station "can't be held responsible" if they
> are "playing the band, giving away the tickets, etc...." is
> ridiculous.
>
> Let me make this simple for you. If I'm a business, and the
> only form of advertising I choose to use is your radio
> station to PROMOTE my business. And I have you give away my
> product (ie - tickets), and talk about my business, and run
> commercials for my business and NO ONE SHOWS UP TO MY
> BUSINESS...I, as that business owner would say "using that
> radio station did NOTHING for me." And...if said radio
> station supposedly had a listener base that was into my
> product I was selling (ie - a band like Il Nino)..and was
> THE ONLY station that played that artist...and no one showed
> up...I would have to lay a nice sized chunk of blame on that
> radio station. Isn't that the station's goal "to bring
> people to the show"?? How can you say "we promoted it, we
> ran the commercials for it, we showed up and did a live
> broadcast...but we wash our hands of the fact that no one
> was there." To me...that's VERY near-sighted and VERY
> irresponsible. If there had been 1,000 people at the
> show...would you also have said you had "nothing to do with
> the turnout?" Remember...you cannot take the accolades if
> you do not take the criticism.
>
> 3. Since when does "pulling numbers" in four markets make
> you a successful station? Doesn't that just mean you have a
> big stick with a lot of wattage behind it??? Sure I'd tell
> people if I were working for a station that was heard in
> half the state. However, I don't think I'd associate that
> with being successful. There's a difference between being
> top rated and just having "ratings".
>
>
> > As much as I hate getting involved with conversations on
> > this board, I'll go ahead and set myself up for some
> > comments with a reply to this recent post...
> >
> > For one, "Michael Cross" doesn't claim that stations that
> > are corporate owned do not have the freedom to be
> musically
> > aggressive. It's a proven fact. Check out
> > www.radioandrecords.com and call up any Clear Channel or
> > Cumulus station's playlist and compare it to KFMW's.
> Having
> > been in broadcasting for 25 years, I do know a little bit
> > about this business and I also know from working for
> > corporations and 'mom & pops' that there is a huge
> > difference. I don't have corporate PD's or consultants
> > telling me what to play. They do.
> >
> > In regards to KFMW's sponsorship of concerts in Cedar
> > Rapids, anyone who's on this board is probably either in
> > radio or unemployed and bitter about not being in radio,
> > which means we should all know how concerts work. Unless
> you
> > are in a medium or major market, odds are good that you
> > aren't spending the money to bring in concerts. Not many
> > stations have the $100,000 it would cost to bring in a
> > national act with support, security, hotels, lights,
> meals,
> > sound and everything included.
> >
> > If you don't know how the "Presents" thing works at
> concerts
> > and you're in radio, then you need to brush up on your
> > knowledge of radio broadcasting. That being said, we also
> > don't make the decisions to bring in certain bands at
> > certain clubs on certain nights. That's all done by the
> > promoter and the club. However, Rock 108 plays Ill Nino
> and
> > as far as I know, KRNA does not. So, to use KFMW in this
> > case was obvious. However, we did not think bringing in
> Ill
> > Nino on a Tuesday night with a record that isn't selling
> was
> > a very good idea.
> >
> > If a club wishes to bring in a band and chooses Rock 108
> to
> > promote the show, then we do the best we can do to help
> the
> > club have a successful night. If the club doesn't have a
> > successful night, then there are reasons why. Blame the
> > ticket price or whatever, but it's tough to blame the
> radio
> > station who's playing the band, running the spots, giving
> > away the tickets and holding a live remote. Ill Nino was
> > thrilled with us regardless of the poor turnout.
> >
> > In regards to the last line of your post of defining
> success
> > in a market, we are the only FM rock station in Iowa that
> > pulls Arbitron numbers in Mason City, Dubuque, Cedar
> Rapids
> > and Waterloo/Cedar Falls. With those kinds of numbers, I'd
>
> > say Rock 108 is more than successful, book after book,
> year
> > after year - without one single format change in almost 6
> > straight years. How many rock stations can make that
> claim?
> >
> > None.
> >
> >
> > Michael Cross
> > OM/PD
> > KFMW-FM
> > Waterloo/Cedar Rapids
> > 319-234-2200
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hold on a sec, first Michael Cross says that stations
> that
> >
> > > are corporate owned (KRNA included) don't have the
> freedom
> >
> > > to do what they want. And now "Joe6Pack" says KRNA is
> > > "copying" KFMW? Which is it?? If you ask me, neither
> > > station invented the Rock format and everyone "copies"
> > > everyone. And as for your comment about KFMW
> "dominating
> > by
> > > bringing in shows to 3rd Street, etc..."..I know those
> who
> >
> > > have brought in those shows, and KFMW hasn't paid A DIME
>
> > to
> > > do that. So it's the promoters that bring in the shows
> > and
> > > then choose KFMW to promote them. Which, by the turnout
>
> > at
> > > Tuesday night's Ill Nino show in Cedar Rapids (of which
> I
> > > was in attendance) of MAYBE 100 people might not be the
> > best
> > > thing to do. Being successful in a market has to do
> with
> > > revenue and ratings - last I checked - not who is the
> > > welcoming station for a band. Just a few thoughts.
> > >
> >
>
 
Michael,

I do not work for KRNA, KFMW, or any other eastern Iowa radio station. I'm not saying that I never have...just that I do not at this time. I do know a lot about radio and the promotions/marketing/sales "game". All I was trying to say in my last post was that it was incredibly irresponsible for you to not take any responsibility for a show that you are promoting. In your response, you STILL do not. It doesn't surprise me. All nestled in your little corner of the world. Safe and sound in a market that isn't even a blip on the largest of radar screens. Enjoy Waterloo Michael. I'm sure this short paragraph will produce yet another Napoleonic mega-response that is long on wind and short on substance. Don't pull a muscle patting yourself on the back my friend. And YOU have a great Christmas. If I see you at one of your station's upcoming shows in Cedar Rapids, I'll be sure to stop and say hello. You do go to the shows you are so proud of...don't you?


> Stickman, do you work at KRNA? Your so worried about (BLEEP)
> that doesn't concern you. However, I'll sucker in and reply.
>
>
> Listen, so the Ill Nino show bombed. I'll take ALL the
> responsibility. Okay? Better? We should have played Ill Nino
> 100 times a week and given away 1000 tickets to ensure that
> there would be people there. Does that make it right for you
> now? I don't know why you are choosing to pick on KFMW over
> one show. Why aren't you talking about all of the other
> shows KFMW has been associated with this year that KRNA was
> not? I don't hear you complain about any other show KFMW
> "presented" - especially Rockstock on Labor Day weekend. One
> show that didn't do well out of the 15 we sponsored in 2005?
> I'll take those odds. I wasn't skirting responsibility for
> the failure of the Ill Nino show. It simply didn't do well,
> but I can guarantee that if KRNA had sponsored the show, the
> result would have been the same. It has nothing to do with
> WHO sponsored the show.
>
> Being musically aggressive doesn't mean success whatsoever
> and your putting words in my mouth because I didn't say that
> it did. If you can't handle or accept the fact that KFMW is
> a successful rock station, then I can't do much about that.
> Success means making money and having the numbers to back
> that up to an advertiser. KFMW has had both of those stats
> for a number of years. If a radio station isn't making money
> and is flipping formats every couple of books, that would
> indicate failure....KFMW hasn't changed format in years and
> the last time we tweaked the format was March 2000....I
> believe that's almost 6 years ago?
>
> There was no "ratings glitch" in Cedar Rapids. KFMW had
> never beat KRNA (12+) in Cedar Rapids before, and obviously
> the programming that was on KRNA wasn't appealing to the
> demo and they flipped to KFMW. Pretty simple. If KRNA is
> beating KFMW from now on, then I guess that would be pretty
> normal for the market. However, I should also point out that
> KRNA didn't even show in the Waterloo Arbitron...and that's
> the first time that has happened in the 8 years I've been
> here. Is that a "ratings glitch" too? I should also point
> out that you are only talking 12+ numbers...do you want to
> go over the target demos, or do you not have access to
> those? With our target demo, Men 18-34, Rock 108 is still
> ranked #1 in Cedar Rapids in afternoon drive and nights.
>
> I shouldn't have to educate you Stickman, seeing as how you
> seem to also have all the answers, but pulling numbers in 4
> markets indicates people enjoy listening to the station. If
> the station sucks, people aren't going to listen (see KRNA's
> 2.5 share in Cedar Rapids a couple of books ago as an
> example). KRNA is a much better rock station now than 2
> years ago and the numbers back that up. I am fine with KRNA
> and their success. It looks as if your the one who's so
> upset by this. Hell, up until recently, 3 out of their 5
> on-air jocks were former KFMW jocks. It indicates that
> whatever they are doing is working and I can't say that I'm
> upset by that, it means Active Rock is a healthy format. It
> also vindicates what Rock 108 has been doing for almost 6
> straight years.
>
> Happy Holidays. May you be a little less angry and
> overwelmed by Rock 108's success. There's bigger things in
> life to get so upset about.
>
>
>
> Michael Cross
> OM/PD
> KFMW-FM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I LOVE it how some people say "I hate posting on this
> board"
> > - and then go on to write a small thesis on what they feel
>
> > is right or wrong with other's posts. That being said,
> and
> > even though Michael Cross begrudgingly posted the first
> time
> > - SIX PARAGRAPHS WORTH - I do have some questions to his
> > post and hope he can answer.
> >
> > 1. Since when does being "agressive" mean being
> successful?
> > With the flip-flopping of KRNA over the past several years
>
> > (rock to classic rock now back to rock) what station
> > wouldn't be successful? I know it's only been a year (2
> > ratings periods I believe), but KFMW and KRNA have
> basically
> > switched positions 12+ in CR...with KFMW now at the bottom
>
> > and KRNA now back up in the top 5. I would love to know
> if
> > Michael Cross attributes that swing to a "glitch" in the
> > ratings system. Or...is it now that he has competition
> > (albeit it a "restricted, corporate constricted station")
> > why isn't that "aggressive" approach showing positive
> > results in Cedar Rapids?
> >
> > 2. If a station, say for example the afore-metioned
> > "renegade" KFMW, doesn't think bringing a band like Il
> Nino
> > into Cedar Rapids for a Tuesday night concert is a good
> idea
> > - why be associated with it at all?? Why not say "we'll
> > pass on this one"? Why hold a LIVE REMOTE? Your comments
>
> > that your radio station "can't be held responsible" if
> they
> > are "playing the band, giving away the tickets, etc...."
> is
> > ridiculous.
> >
> > Let me make this simple for you. If I'm a business, and
> the
> > only form of advertising I choose to use is your radio
> > station to PROMOTE my business. And I have you give away
> my
> > product (ie - tickets), and talk about my business, and
> run
> > commercials for my business and NO ONE SHOWS UP TO MY
> > BUSINESS...I, as that business owner would say "using that
>
> > radio station did NOTHING for me." And...if said radio
> > station supposedly had a listener base that was into my
> > product I was selling (ie - a band like Il Nino)..and was
> > THE ONLY station that played that artist...and no one
> showed
> > up...I would have to lay a nice sized chunk of blame on
> that
> > radio station. Isn't that the station's goal "to bring
> > people to the show"?? How can you say "we promoted it, we
>
> > ran the commercials for it, we showed up and did a live
> > broadcast...but we wash our hands of the fact that no one
> > was there." To me...that's VERY near-sighted and VERY
> > irresponsible. If there had been 1,000 people at the
> > show...would you also have said you had "nothing to do
> with
> > the turnout?" Remember...you cannot take the accolades if
>
> > you do not take the criticism.
> >
> > 3. Since when does "pulling numbers" in four markets make
>
> > you a successful station? Doesn't that just mean you have
> a
> > big stick with a lot of wattage behind it??? Sure I'd
> tell
> > people if I were working for a station that was heard in
> > half the state. However, I don't think I'd associate that
>
> > with being successful. There's a difference between being
>
> > top rated and just having "ratings".
> >
> >
> > > As much as I hate getting involved with conversations on
>
> > > this board, I'll go ahead and set myself up for some
> > > comments with a reply to this recent post...
> > >
> > > For one, "Michael Cross" doesn't claim that stations
> that
> > > are corporate owned do not have the freedom to be
> > musically
> > > aggressive. It's a proven fact. Check out
> > > www.radioandrecords.com and call up any Clear Channel or
>
> > > Cumulus station's playlist and compare it to KFMW's.
> > Having
> > > been in broadcasting for 25 years, I do know a little
> bit
> > > about this business and I also know from working for
> > > corporations and 'mom & pops' that there is a huge
> > > difference. I don't have corporate PD's or consultants
> > > telling me what to play. They do.
> > >
> > > In regards to KFMW's sponsorship of concerts in Cedar
> > > Rapids, anyone who's on this board is probably either in
>
> > > radio or unemployed and bitter about not being in radio,
>
> > > which means we should all know how concerts work. Unless
>
> > you
> > > are in a medium or major market, odds are good that you
> > > aren't spending the money to bring in concerts. Not many
>
> > > stations have the $100,000 it would cost to bring in a
> > > national act with support, security, hotels, lights,
> > meals,
> > > sound and everything included.
> > >
> > > If you don't know how the "Presents" thing works at
> > concerts
> > > and you're in radio, then you need to brush up on your
> > > knowledge of radio broadcasting. That being said, we
> also
> > > don't make the decisions to bring in certain bands at
> > > certain clubs on certain nights. That's all done by the
> > > promoter and the club. However, Rock 108 plays Ill Nino
> > and
> > > as far as I know, KRNA does not. So, to use KFMW in this
>
> > > case was obvious. However, we did not think bringing in
> > Ill
> > > Nino on a Tuesday night with a record that isn't selling
>
> > was
> > > a very good idea.
> > >
> > > If a club wishes to bring in a band and chooses Rock 108
>
> > to
> > > promote the show, then we do the best we can do to help
> > the
> > > club have a successful night. If the club doesn't have a
>
> > > successful night, then there are reasons why. Blame the
> > > ticket price or whatever, but it's tough to blame the
> > radio
> > > station who's playing the band, running the spots,
> giving
> > > away the tickets and holding a live remote. Ill Nino was
>
> > > thrilled with us regardless of the poor turnout.
> > >
> > > In regards to the last line of your post of defining
> > success
> > > in a market, we are the only FM rock station in Iowa
> that
> > > pulls Arbitron numbers in Mason City, Dubuque, Cedar
> > Rapids
> > > and Waterloo/Cedar Falls. With those kinds of numbers,
> I'd
> >
> > > say Rock 108 is more than successful, book after book,
> > year
> > > after year - without one single format change in almost
> 6
> > > straight years. How many rock stations can make that
> > claim?
> > >
> > > None.
> > >
> > >
> > > Michael Cross
> > > OM/PD
> > > KFMW-FM
> > > Waterloo/Cedar Rapids
> > > 319-234-2200
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hold on a sec, first Michael Cross says that stations
> > that
> > >
> > > > are corporate owned (KRNA included) don't have the
> > freedom
> > >
> > > > to do what they want. And now "Joe6Pack" says KRNA is
>
> > > > "copying" KFMW? Which is it?? If you ask me, neither
>
> > > > station invented the Rock format and everyone "copies"
>
> > > > everyone. And as for your comment about KFMW
> > "dominating
> > > by
> > > > bringing in shows to 3rd Street, etc..."..I know those
>
> > who
> > >
> > > > have brought in those shows, and KFMW hasn't paid A
> DIME
> >
> > > to
> > > > do that. So it's the promoters that bring in the
> shows
> > > and
> > > > then choose KFMW to promote them. Which, by the
> turnout
> >
> > > at
> > > > Tuesday night's Ill Nino show in Cedar Rapids (of
> which
> > I
> > > > was in attendance) of MAYBE 100 people might not be
> the
> > > best
> > > > thing to do. Being successful in a market has to do
> > with
> > > > revenue and ratings - last I checked - not who is the
> > > > welcoming station for a band. Just a few thoughts.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
 
Stickman, the fact that you would rant and rave just becuase another station got some compliments says a lot about you. Also that was really low for ripping on Cross because he is in Waterloo. The market size does Not always indicate the qualify of talent. Sometimes the best jocks/pds are people that stay put in smaller markets becuase they care about their station and that community. Again, I think KFMW is a great station.

> Michael,
>
> I do not work for KRNA, KFMW, or any other eastern Iowa
> radio station. I'm not saying that I never have...just that
> I do not at this time. I do know a lot about radio and the
> promotions/marketing/sales "game". All I was trying to say
> in my last post was that it was incredibly irresponsible for
> you to not take any responsibility for a show that you are
> promoting. In your response, you STILL do not. It doesn't
> surprise me. All nestled in your little corner of the
> world. Safe and sound in a market that isn't even a blip on
> the largest of radar screens. Enjoy Waterloo Michael. I'm
> sure this short paragraph will produce yet another
> Napoleonic mega-response that is long on wind and short on
> substance. Don't pull a muscle patting yourself on the back
> my friend. And YOU have a great Christmas. If I see you at
> one of your station's upcoming shows in Cedar Rapids, I'll
> be sure to stop and say hello. You do go to the shows you
> are so proud of...don't you?
>
>
> > Stickman, do you work at KRNA? Your so worried about
> (BLEEP)
> > that doesn't concern you. However, I'll sucker in and
> reply.
> >
> >
> > Listen, so the Ill Nino show bombed. I'll take ALL the
> > responsibility. Okay? Better? We should have played Ill
> Nino
> > 100 times a week and given away 1000 tickets to ensure
> that
> > there would be people there. Does that make it right for
> you
> > now? I don't know why you are choosing to pick on KFMW
> over
> > one show. Why aren't you talking about all of the other
> > shows KFMW has been associated with this year that KRNA
> was
> > not? I don't hear you complain about any other show KFMW
> > "presented" - especially Rockstock on Labor Day weekend.
> One
> > show that didn't do well out of the 15 we sponsored in
> 2005?
> > I'll take those odds. I wasn't skirting responsibility for
>
> > the failure of the Ill Nino show. It simply didn't do
> well,
> > but I can guarantee that if KRNA had sponsored the show,
> the
> > result would have been the same. It has nothing to do with
>
> > WHO sponsored the show.
> >
> > Being musically aggressive doesn't mean success whatsoever
>
> > and your putting words in my mouth because I didn't say
> that
> > it did. If you can't handle or accept the fact that KFMW
> is
> > a successful rock station, then I can't do much about
> that.
> > Success means making money and having the numbers to back
> > that up to an advertiser. KFMW has had both of those stats
>
> > for a number of years. If a radio station isn't making
> money
> > and is flipping formats every couple of books, that would
> > indicate failure....KFMW hasn't changed format in years
> and
> > the last time we tweaked the format was March 2000....I
> > believe that's almost 6 years ago?
> >
> > There was no "ratings glitch" in Cedar Rapids. KFMW had
> > never beat KRNA (12+) in Cedar Rapids before, and
> obviously
> > the programming that was on KRNA wasn't appealing to the
> > demo and they flipped to KFMW. Pretty simple. If KRNA is
> > beating KFMW from now on, then I guess that would be
> pretty
> > normal for the market. However, I should also point out
> that
> > KRNA didn't even show in the Waterloo Arbitron...and
> that's
> > the first time that has happened in the 8 years I've been
> > here. Is that a "ratings glitch" too? I should also point
> > out that you are only talking 12+ numbers...do you want to
>
> > go over the target demos, or do you not have access to
> > those? With our target demo, Men 18-34, Rock 108 is still
> > ranked #1 in Cedar Rapids in afternoon drive and nights.
> >
> > I shouldn't have to educate you Stickman, seeing as how
> you
> > seem to also have all the answers, but pulling numbers in
> 4
> > markets indicates people enjoy listening to the station.
> If
> > the station sucks, people aren't going to listen (see
> KRNA's
> > 2.5 share in Cedar Rapids a couple of books ago as an
> > example). KRNA is a much better rock station now than 2
> > years ago and the numbers back that up. I am fine with
> KRNA
> > and their success. It looks as if your the one who's so
> > upset by this. Hell, up until recently, 3 out of their 5
> > on-air jocks were former KFMW jocks. It indicates that
> > whatever they are doing is working and I can't say that
> I'm
> > upset by that, it means Active Rock is a healthy format.
> It
> > also vindicates what Rock 108 has been doing for almost 6
> > straight years.
> >
> > Happy Holidays. May you be a little less angry and
> > overwelmed by Rock 108's success. There's bigger things in
>
> > life to get so upset about.
> >
> >
> >
> > Michael Cross
> > OM/PD
> > KFMW-FM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I LOVE it how some people say "I hate posting on this
> > board"
> > > - and then go on to write a small thesis on what they
> feel
> >
> > > is right or wrong with other's posts. That being said,
> > and
> > > even though Michael Cross begrudgingly posted the first
> > time
> > > - SIX PARAGRAPHS WORTH - I do have some questions to his
>
> > > post and hope he can answer.
> > >
> > > 1. Since when does being "agressive" mean being
> > successful?
> > > With the flip-flopping of KRNA over the past several
> years
> >
> > > (rock to classic rock now back to rock) what station
> > > wouldn't be successful? I know it's only been a year (2
>
> > > ratings periods I believe), but KFMW and KRNA have
> > basically
> > > switched positions 12+ in CR...with KFMW now at the
> bottom
> >
> > > and KRNA now back up in the top 5. I would love to know
>
> > if
> > > Michael Cross attributes that swing to a "glitch" in the
>
> > > ratings system. Or...is it now that he has competition
> > > (albeit it a "restricted, corporate constricted
> station")
> > > why isn't that "aggressive" approach showing positive
> > > results in Cedar Rapids?
> > >
> > > 2. If a station, say for example the afore-metioned
> > > "renegade" KFMW, doesn't think bringing a band like Il
> > Nino
> > > into Cedar Rapids for a Tuesday night concert is a good
> > idea
> > > - why be associated with it at all?? Why not say "we'll
>
> > > pass on this one"? Why hold a LIVE REMOTE? Your
> comments
> >
> > > that your radio station "can't be held responsible" if
> > they
> > > are "playing the band, giving away the tickets, etc...."
>
> > is
> > > ridiculous.
> > >
> > > Let me make this simple for you. If I'm a business, and
>
> > the
> > > only form of advertising I choose to use is your radio
> > > station to PROMOTE my business. And I have you give
> away
> > my
> > > product (ie - tickets), and talk about my business, and
> > run
> > > commercials for my business and NO ONE SHOWS UP TO MY
> > > BUSINESS...I, as that business owner would say "using
> that
> >
> > > radio station did NOTHING for me." And...if said radio
> > > station supposedly had a listener base that was into my
> > > product I was selling (ie - a band like Il Nino)..and
> was
> > > THE ONLY station that played that artist...and no one
> > showed
> > > up...I would have to lay a nice sized chunk of blame on
> > that
> > > radio station. Isn't that the station's goal "to bring
> > > people to the show"?? How can you say "we promoted it,
> we
> >
> > > ran the commercials for it, we showed up and did a live
> > > broadcast...but we wash our hands of the fact that no
> one
> > > was there." To me...that's VERY near-sighted and VERY
> > > irresponsible. If there had been 1,000 people at the
> > > show...would you also have said you had "nothing to do
> > with
> > > the turnout?" Remember...you cannot take the accolades
> if
> >
> > > you do not take the criticism.
> > >
> > > 3. Since when does "pulling numbers" in four markets
> make
> >
> > > you a successful station? Doesn't that just mean you
> have
> > a
> > > big stick with a lot of wattage behind it??? Sure I'd
> > tell
> > > people if I were working for a station that was heard in
>
> > > half the state. However, I don't think I'd associate
> that
> >
> > > with being successful. There's a difference between
> being
> >
> > > top rated and just having "ratings".
> > >
> > >
> > > > As much as I hate getting involved with conversations
> on
> >
> > > > this board, I'll go ahead and set myself up for some
> > > > comments with a reply to this recent post...
> > > >
> > > > For one, "Michael Cross" doesn't claim that stations
> > that
> > > > are corporate owned do not have the freedom to be
> > > musically
> > > > aggressive. It's a proven fact. Check out
> > > > www.radioandrecords.com and call up any Clear Channel
> or
> >
> > > > Cumulus station's playlist and compare it to KFMW's.
> > > Having
> > > > been in broadcasting for 25 years, I do know a little
> > bit
> > > > about this business and I also know from working for
> > > > corporations and 'mom & pops' that there is a huge
> > > > difference. I don't have corporate PD's or consultants
>
> > > > telling me what to play. They do.
> > > >
> > > > In regards to KFMW's sponsorship of concerts in Cedar
> > > > Rapids, anyone who's on this board is probably either
> in
> >
> > > > radio or unemployed and bitter about not being in
> radio,
> >
> > > > which means we should all know how concerts work.
> Unless
> >
> > > you
> > > > are in a medium or major market, odds are good that
> you
> > > > aren't spending the money to bring in concerts. Not
> many
> >
> > > > stations have the $100,000 it would cost to bring in a
>
> > > > national act with support, security, hotels, lights,
> > > meals,
> > > > sound and everything included.
> > > >
> > > > If you don't know how the "Presents" thing works at
> > > concerts
> > > > and you're in radio, then you need to brush up on your
>
> > > > knowledge of radio broadcasting. That being said, we
> > also
> > > > don't make the decisions to bring in certain bands at
> > > > certain clubs on certain nights. That's all done by
> the
> > > > promoter and the club. However, Rock 108 plays Ill
> Nino
> > > and
> > > > as far as I know, KRNA does not. So, to use KFMW in
> this
> >
> > > > case was obvious. However, we did not think bringing
> in
> > > Ill
> > > > Nino on a Tuesday night with a record that isn't
> selling
> >
> > > was
> > > > a very good idea.
> > > >
> > > > If a club wishes to bring in a band and chooses Rock
> 108
> >
> > > to
> > > > promote the show, then we do the best we can do to
> help
> > > the
> > > > club have a successful night. If the club doesn't have
> a
> >
> > > > successful night, then there are reasons why. Blame
> the
> > > > ticket price or whatever, but it's tough to blame the
> > > radio
> > > > station who's playing the band, running the spots,
> > giving
> > > > away the tickets and holding a live remote. Ill Nino
> was
> >
> > > > thrilled with us regardless of the poor turnout.
> > > >
> > > > In regards to the last line of your post of defining
> > > success
> > > > in a market, we are the only FM rock station in Iowa
> > that
> > > > pulls Arbitron numbers in Mason City, Dubuque, Cedar
> > > Rapids
> > > > and Waterloo/Cedar Falls. With those kinds of numbers,
>
> > I'd
> > >
> > > > say Rock 108 is more than successful, book after book,
>
> > > year
> > > > after year - without one single format change in
> almost
> > 6
> > > > straight years. How many rock stations can make that
> > > claim?
> > > >
> > > > None.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Michael Cross
> > > > OM/PD
> > > > KFMW-FM
> > > > Waterloo/Cedar Rapids
> > > > 319-234-2200
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hold on a sec, first Michael Cross says that
> stations
> > > that
> > > >
> > > > > are corporate owned (KRNA included) don't have the
> > > freedom
> > > >
> > > > > to do what they want. And now "Joe6Pack" says KRNA
> is
> >
> > > > > "copying" KFMW? Which is it?? If you ask me,
> neither
> >
> > > > > station invented the Rock format and everyone
> "copies"
> >
> > > > > everyone. And as for your comment about KFMW
> > > "dominating
> > > > by
> > > > > bringing in shows to 3rd Street, etc..."..I know
> those
> >
> > > who
> > > >
> > > > > have brought in those shows, and KFMW hasn't paid A
> > DIME
> > >
> > > > to
> > > > > do that. So it's the promoters that bring in the
> > shows
> > > > and
> > > > > then choose KFMW to promote them. Which, by the
> > turnout
> > >
> > > > at
> > > > > Tuesday night's Ill Nino show in Cedar Rapids (of
> > which
> > > I
> > > > > was in attendance) of MAYBE 100 people might not be
> > the
> > > > best
> > > > > thing to do. Being successful in a market has to do
>
> > > with
> > > > > revenue and ratings - last I checked - not who is
> the
> > > > > welcoming station for a band. Just a few thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by radioDK on 12/08/05 10:03 AM.</FONT></P>
 
RadioDK, thank you.

The fact the Stickman - who doesn't have the guts to use his name on his posts wheras I have - is apparently an unemployed has-been. If he were any good, he would be employed. The truth is, I am proudly FROM Waterloo, Iowa. I was born and raised here. I left Waterloo/Cedar Falls in 1980 when I was 19 because the then-PD's of KWWL-AM and of KOKZ told me I needed to get broadcasting experience in a smaller market. Well, I didn't come back home for 17 years. I am now overseeing both FM stations I grew up with and I am doing so because I love it here. I know Waterloo has it's reasons for having the image it does, and believe me, I hate things about it too, but then again, I hated things about the bigger cities I worked in - Dallas, Des Moines and Minneapolis. In this day and age of radio, who gives a crap about market size? Obviously, being unemployed, Stickman can't even get a job in the smallest of Iowa communities.

:)







> Stickman, the fact that you would rant and rave just becuase
> another station got some compliments says a lot about you.
> Also that was really low for ripping on Cross because he is
> in Waterloo. The market size does Not always indicate the
> qualify of talent. Sometimes the best jocks/pds are people
> that stay put in smaller markets becuase they care about
> their station and that community. Again, I think KFMW is a
> great station.
 
Hey Michael,

If you could...please list the last THREE Rock 108 sponsored concerts you attended. Thanks!



> RadioDK, thank you.
>
> The fact the Stickman - who doesn't have the guts to use his
> name on his posts wheras I have - is apparently an
> unemployed has-been. If he were any good, he would be
> employed. The truth is, I am proudly FROM Waterloo, Iowa. I
> was born and raised here. I left Waterloo/Cedar Falls in
> 1980 when I was 19 because the then-PD's of KWWL-AM and of
> KOKZ told me I needed to get broadcasting experience in a
> smaller market. Well, I didn't come back home for 17 years.
> I am now overseeing both FM stations I grew up with and I am
> doing so because I love it here. I know Waterloo has it's
> reasons for having the image it does, and believe me, I hate
> things about it too, but then again, I hated things about
> the bigger cities I worked in - Dallas, Des Moines and
> Minneapolis. In this day and age of radio, who gives a crap
> about market size? Obviously, being unemployed, Stickman
> can't even get a job in the smallest of Iowa communities.
>
> :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Stickman, the fact that you would rant and rave just
> becuase
> > another station got some compliments says a lot about you.
>
> > Also that was really low for ripping on Cross because he
> is
> > in Waterloo. The market size does Not always indicate the
>
> > qualify of talent. Sometimes the best jocks/pds are people
>
> > that stay put in smaller markets becuase they care about
> > their station and that community. Again, I think KFMW is
> a
> > great station.
>
 
> I hated things about
> the bigger cities I worked in - Dallas, Des Moines and
> Minneapolis. In this day and age of radio, who gives a crap
> about market size?



I hear ya about the big city lifestyle....Just checked Rock 108s #s in Waterloo...In the Top 5 with a 6.8 12+...Solid. 4.0 in CR...locked in a ratings battle there with KRNA, only a point and a half seperate ya. Rock on.

Good luck with the Nine Inch Nails Show Mr.Cross, Im sure heads will be running up in the doors for that show. In fact Im sure Ill Nino would have done better on a friday and not so close to Christmas. (you know how it is, everybody saving to make the kids happy with stuff under the tree.) Ill Nino are pros, they have been around. Im sure they are already off doing the rockstar thing in some other town tonight. Trashing hotels, picking up chics. Good for them.
 
Compare those numbers to two years ago and even a year ago...and they're NOTHING. That station has been driven into the ground and will fall even further when this next book comes out...you can bet on it! Then, once it's in the bottom half of both Cedar Rapids AND Waterloo...we'll see how long Mr Cross stays in his precious "hometown."



> > I hated things about
> > the bigger cities I worked in - Dallas, Des Moines and
> > Minneapolis. In this day and age of radio, who gives a
> crap
> > about market size?
>
>
>
> I hear ya about the big city lifestyle....Just checked Rock
> 108s #s in Waterloo...In the Top 5 with a 6.8 12+...Solid.
> 4.0 in CR...locked in a ratings battle there with KRNA, only
> a point and a half seperate ya. Rock on.
>
> Good luck with the Nine Inch Nails Show Mr.Cross, Im sure
> heads will be running up in the doors for that show. In fact
> Im sure Ill Nino would have done better on a friday and not
> so close to Christmas. (you know how it is, everybody saving
> to make the kids happy with stuff under the tree.) Ill Nino
> are pros, they have been around. Im sure they are already
> off doing the rockstar thing in some other town tonight.
> Trashing hotels, picking up chics. Good for them.
>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom