• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Apple to sell audio ads on "iRadio" music service -sources

What does this mean to radio oh most knowledgeable board?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013...News&feedType=RSS&feedName=companyNews&rpc=43

oornima Gupta

(Reuters) - Apple Inc is gearing up to sell audio ads on a music-streaming service it intends to unveil at its developers conference next week, according to people familiar with the plan, going up against Google Inc and Pandora Media Inc in the increasingly competitive market for mobile tunes.

The iPhone maker, which has been working to put together a streaming music service for the past year, has contacted some of its bigger advertisers but hasn't started selling the service extensively yet, one of the people said.

The music service, dubbed "iRadio" by the tech industry and media, is expected to closely resemble Pandora Music in its monetization strategy. It will feature audio and banner ads sold through Apple's iAd mobile network, said the people who were not authorized to speak publicly.

The service, which is expected to launch later this year, will also have ads currently sold by the iAd division, they said.

When finally launched, Apple will become the latest entrant to an arena that sources say tech giants from Amazon.com Inc to Facebook have considered joining.

It's unclear what features the service will have, though Wall Street analysts and technology blogs speculate it will, like Pandora, operate much like an online radio station that streams a selection of music based on users' preferences.

Mobile device makers see a viable music streaming service as crucial to ensuring users remain loyal to their mobile products. About 48 percent of smartphone users listen to music on their device, making it the fourth most popular media-related activity after social networking, games and news, according to a ComScore survey of mobile behavior released in February.

Holding onto users is key to Apple, which gets the lions' share of its revenue from the sale of devices rather than the sale of digital content such as songs and TV shows.

The new ad-supported music service from Apple, which pioneered and now dominates music purchases through iTunes, is expected to be free to users. The other business model - adopted by rivals Google and Spotify - is an ad-free subscription model where consumers pay a flat fee for listening time.

A spokesman for Apple declined to comment about audio ads for the music streaming service, which was first reported by industry publication AdvertisingAge.

WWDC OPENS NEXT WEEK

Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference, which starts Monday, is expected to showcase the latest improvements to its iOS mobile operating software. It has also used the multi-day affair in the past to show off its latest Macintosh computers.

Apple has made selling ads for the new music streaming service a focus for its iAd unit, which will continue to sell regular mobile ads. Selling big-brand campaigns to advertisers would be a key priority for the unit, the people said.

To ensure the service debuts with ample content, Apple has been rushing to ink deals with the music industry.

Apple has agreements in place with Warner Music Group and Universal Music Group but remains in talks over music rights with Sony Music Entertainment as well as its separate publishing arm, Sony/ATV.

Streaming music remains a nascent market, dwarfed by music sales via outlets such as iTunes, but one that is attracting investment.

Apple's streaming music service will compete with popular existing services such as Spotify and Pandora, which has about 70 million active listeners.

The rising cost of licensing has forced Pandora, whose revenue comes mainly from advertisers, to introduce a cap of 40 hours of free listening on mobile devices. A $3.99 subscription is required to venture beyond that limit.

The other deep-pocketed player that started offering music-streaming is Google with its "All Access" service which allows unlimited listening for $9.99 a month. It launched its service last month, ahead of Apple.

Shares in Pandora have plunged 17 percent this week as reports circulated that Apple was close to announcing its rival service.
 
jamesh said:
What does this mean to radio oh most knowledgeable board?

This isn't going to be a big money-maker for Apple. The thing that's driven down Apple stock over the last six months has been declining margins, and this won't help. The only thing this does is provide better integration with iTunes, and makes that a more complete experience. If you use iTunes, why go anywhere else? iTunes has 300 million users, compared to 80 million for Pandora. No wonder Pandora's stock lost $2.

They're going to be paying higher royalties than Pandora, which means they'll need to attract more revenues to cover their costs. They'll sell audio ads, but they will barely cover the royalty costs. And the question is how many ads will people have to see in order to hear free music? Some services require you watch a :30 commercial for every 3 minute song! That's about the same as listening to OTA radio! So from a user perspective, you still have to sit through ads. And like all of these digital systems, the user has to basically do all the work. This is why OTA radio hasn't really been hurt by digital radio.
 
Thanks for your analysis! This not a financial issue so wondering what programmers think of this new Apple venture. Apple has over 100 billion in cash-this is like you buying a pack of gum to them.
 
The pointis they're not spending their $100 billion on local DJs. And if anyone could afford it, they could, if their customers wanted them.
 
It's definitely not a Steve Jobs' Apple move. They are late comer in the market. Going to be interesting if they are able to master doing it better than Pandora or its ilk. The one advantage Apple has is that they can directly link sales with listening. If you like a song you can buy it right then and there through iTunes.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom