• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Approaching Storm: How well does Buffalo radio cover it?

a lot of areas got closer to 2 feet than 4 feet. The southtowns did get whacked and it's over six feet in some places. . BTW, state and local officials have certainly done a better job with this storm than they did back in 2014 when hundreds of cars and trucks were stranded on the Thruway for more than 24 hours. It's still a lot easier to handle a snowstorm than a hurricane or tornado and WNY knows how to get the job done.
You make it sound like a competition. New Orleans and Florida aren't experts at snow removal. Snowstorms typically don't destroy the infrastructure like hurricanes and tornados. An ice storm certainly can take down power lines. This latest storm is WNY is an extreme one. Lake Effect squalls are happening elsewhere though.

BTW, the Weather Channel and other reputable sources nailed this forecast. You may not believe it, but Buffalo is not the mecca of all knowledge and know how. No reasonable person thinks that 6 feet of snow in one day should be easy to handle. You seem to be thin skinned because yet another Buffalo snow event has made national news...
 
You make it sound like a competition. New Orleans and Florida aren't experts at snow removal. Snowstorms typically don't destroy the infrastructure like hurricanes and tornados. An ice storm certainly can take down power lines. This latest storm is WNY is an extreme one. Lake Effect squalls are happening elsewhere though.

BTW, the Weather Channel and other reputable sources nailed this forecast. You may not believe it, but Buffalo is not the mecca of all knowledge and know how. No reasonable person thinks that 6 feet of snow in one day should be easy to handle. You seem to be thin skinned because yet another Buffalo snow event has made national news...
It wasn't six feet in one day. It was six feet over two days in limited areas. Most of the area had roads clear even though a travel ban was on. North of the city they even dropped the travel ban for a while because they only had 4" before the band shifted north today. The city and northern suburbs still have less than a foot of snow. BTW, that information is from The Weather Channel website. Yes, their reporters are following the snow band and often reporting the snow in "Buffalo" when it's not really hitting the city badly. You seem to take the negative side of most things posted on this board. I don't know if you simply don't know the area or your life is just that miserable.
 
It wasn't six feet in one day. It was six feet over two days in limited areas. Most of the area had roads clear even though a travel ban was on. North of the city they even dropped the travel ban for a while because they only had 4" before the band shifted north today. The city and northern suburbs still have less than a foot of snow. BTW, that information is from The Weather Channel website. Yes, their reporters are following the snow band and often reporting the snow in "Buffalo" when it's not really hitting the city badly. You seem to take the negative side of most things posted on this board. I don't know if you simply don't know the area or your life is just that miserable.
Orchard Park, West Seneca, Hamburg are close suburbs of Buffalo, correct? They are just a few miles away. Orchard Park got 6 FEET of snow. How much snow does it take before you admit that's extreme? Maybe building a new stadium in the exact location isn't a bright idea. The coverage I saw used the town names specifically, not Buffalo.

You said weather predictions were "overblown". They weren't. Lake Effect bands can dump a lot of snow on certain areas, while others a few miles away are in blue sky. The coverage I saw made that point clear. There were still some motorists stranded because they think they can pass right through unscathed. Some drivers were given citations for ignoring driving bans. Trucks that couldn't use the interstate tried to use side roads causing more gridlock.

My life is pleasant--Lake Effect snow looks miserable...
 
Last edited:
My life is pleasant--Lake Effect snow looks miserable...
Show me a place that doesn't have its weather or climate challenges. At least we just have to shovel ours once in a while. Perhaps you should concentrate more on your local paradise and less on WNY. You don't seem to get what's really going on here anyway.
 
That's correct and it's getting worse. Weather events like this one are becoming more frequent and more destructive. It only matters to some people when it inconveniences THEM. Climate Change affects us all...
Perhaps you should rant about that on a climate change website.
 
I am more than happy with our team for providing live coverage as they did…updates all the time….without the news reporters that other companies can afford to employee.

As music stations are concerned, nobody did a better job than WECK. There was not one break or hour that our live personalities were not updating listeners on the storm, and combined with our partnership with Storm Team 2, there is no other music station that could do what WECK did.

I should say, they could do it, but they choose not too.

Thank you Glenn Topolski, Joe Chille, Tom Donahue, Roger Christian, and Bobby O for a job well done.
 
You said this kind of storm was nothing new. It was something new
I said three feet of snow was nothing new. I said nothing about six feet, because I'm not clairvoyant, and the very early forecasts indicated snowfall of about three feet. What exactly do I need to redact? By the way, I'm not a climate change denier, so don't try pinning that on me.
 
I said three feet of snow was nothing new. I said nothing about six feet, because I'm not clairvoyant, and the very early forecasts indicated snowfall of about three feet. What exactly do I need to redact? By the way, I'm not a climate change denier, so don't try pinning that on me.
10 Our Fathers, 12 Hail Mary's, and help an old lady cross the street.

Then you'll be square.
 
In the year 2022 I think most people realize a music station is not going to wall to wall cover a storm like this. Everyone knows to tune into WBEN or whatever the local news station is for that. When full service stations dominated it was a different story and they were expected to cut back the music and increase the coverage during an event like this. Short of something like a 911 or a hurricane/tornado or storm with massive regional destruction I wouldn't think a music oriented station would have much response. Even then the response would be to simulcast the new/talk station in the cluster or a local TV station. Think the New Orleans market where many stations simulcast WWL for days during and after hurricane Katrina or even during 911 a lot of WINS and WCBS simulcasting was going on.

That said, a station like WECK has an advantage as with live hosts they can adjust on the fly to fit in extra weather updates but they also didn't stop the music to go wall to wall like a WKBW in the blizzard of 77 either (not that this compares to 77).
 
Any station that has live bodies should certainly be able to give relevant information in between songs. There was a time when competent professional broadcasters were employed. Emphasizing the driving bans and reminding people NOT to travel into the affected areas isn't too hard.

It once was possible to entertain and inform(and maybe even have some fun by playing weather related songs)...
 
Last edited:
Any station that has live bodies should certainly be able to give relevant information in between songs.
That was back when the FCC had much more specific news and Public Affairs quotas. Now, most music stations don't have a news service and would have no source for "relevant information".
There was a time when competent professional broadcasters were employed.
They still are. But with so many station in each market, a few take a news and information position and the others do not.
Emphasizing the driving bans and reminding people NOT to travel into the affected areas isn't too hard.
We know now that the average person uses about 6 stations each week. They know where to go for news and information. We all don't have to repeat the same data over and over again.

About 4 years ago, I had the #1 station in market #14. It had double the share of the #2 station. It did no news. Along came a big hurricane, and I decided we should cover it. We had no news image, and although we did a great job, we lost half our ratings in the week of the storm. People wanted music from us and knew where to go for news.
It once was possible to entertain and inform(and maybe even have some fun by playing weather related songs)...
It was "possible" just as playing songs backwards to find diabolic lyrics is possible. But listeners, it turned out, did not want that. There is a saying in Spanish: "cobbler to your shoes"; stations, in an era of specialization, have to be known for an outstanding quality. If, day in and day out, it is music then you can't expect them to be The Weather Channel for a few days.
 
That was back when the FCC had much more specific news and Public Affairs quotas. Now, most music stations don't have a news service and would have no source for "relevant information".
That's ridiculous. They have lots of options to gather updated information. Ever heard of internet? I did not suggest that music stations needed to offer wall to wall storm coverage. They also shouldn't completely ignore a major weather event that's impacting the community they are supposed to serve...
 
That's ridiculous. They have lots of options to gather updated information. Ever heard of internet?
Ever heard of copyrights?

And, in any case, music stations today have no staff that is experienced in writing, in the "meaning" of weather terminology or climate science. Having an untrained staff covering a life-threatening weather occurrence is like giving a machine gun to a chimpanzee... potentially very dangerous and unlikely to have a positive outcome.
I did not suggest that music stations needed to offer wall to wall storm coverage. They also shouldn't completely ignore a major weather event that's impacting the community they are supposed to serve...
And that is why I suggested either referring listeners to a cluster station that does cover news or having an agreement with a local TV station or even with the local news paper.

There are ways of covering events that are outside the training and skills of a music station's staff that don't have the potential to broadcast inaccurate or poorly expressed information.

And, based on experience, I have told you how listeners themselves don't expect a music station to cover such an important event... and even if you do, they will not trust you.
 
Music stations have a role to play in situations like the recent storm. As David said, people know where to go for wall-to-wall coverage. People also want a place to go to escape wall-to-wall coverage, but they do need to be informed of new developments. That's the balance that a music station needs to find.

There is definitely information out there that doesn't violate any copyrights. For example, the National Weather Service is an excellent source. In fact, it's the source of information for most of the "exclusive" forecasts that rarely vary significantly from the NWS zone forecasts and/or information available in the warnings and advisory sections of the site. There's plenty of traffic information and CAMS available from NITTEC and the state DOT. All it takes is talent with the information gathering and communications skills required to put together and update a synopsis that keeps people up to date. If people are incapable of that, they don't belong on the radio. They're simply not prepared for the medium. Good grief, most air talent is expected to not only broadcast (often on multiple stations), they're expected to blog and post on social media. They'd better have good enough communications skills to do that.

Of course, that requires live bodies to do the work and get it on the air, either live or close to live via VT. The real failure is syndication that simply blithely blathers on while a storm puts people in danger. Whether it's snow, wildfires, earthquakes, or hurricanes, GOOD radio plays its part - or should.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom