• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Are boomers NOT a good ad target?

Re: well, actually

Don62 said:
David, you must not watch TV commercials.
Hopper has been doing a series of commercials on retirment investing for Baby Boomers. You know, that monster group that radio seems blind about.
The song, GIMMER SOME LOVIN', plays behind the words.

Those ads are targeted mostly at 35-50, for those getting to their peak earning power who have the ability to invest for retirement.
 
Re: well, actually

DavidEduardo said:
Don62 said:
David, you must not watch TV commercials.
Hopper has been doing a series of commercials on retirment investing for Baby Boomers. You know, that monster group that radio seems blind about.
The song, GIMMER SOME LOVIN', plays behind the words.

Those ads are targeted mostly at 35-50, for those getting to their peak earning power who have the ability to invest for retirement.
Then why do they play a song from '67?
The commercials show those people surfin' at the beach, the 60s generation, flower power, etc.
It's the 60s era, man.
 
Re: well, actually

Don62 said:
Then why do they play a song from '67?
The commercials show those people surfin' at the beach, the 60s generation, flower power, etc.
It's the 60s era, man.

Someone who was 13 in 1967 is just in thier early 50's now.

By retirement age, anyone with investments has long had a trusted advisor or financial institution. The prime candidates and in their 40's.

Further, we are discussing radio here. TV is used for older demos, although mostly via cable nets, because there is a good ROI against, at least, 55-64 there. And it is very efficient in delivery, since TV is program based while radio is format based; TV can pick up dollars by running some shows for 45-64, while radio can not dedicate a whole station to the demo as there is not enough revenue to be had to support a station 24/7.
 
tv & Oldies

Don62 said:
DavidEduardo said:
Don62 said:
David, you must not watch TV commercials.
Hopper has been doing a series of commercials on retirment investing for Baby Boomers. You know, that monster group that radio seems blind about.
The song, GIMMER SOME LOVIN', plays behind the words.

Those ads are targeted mostly at 35-50, for those getting to their peak earning power who have the ability to invest for retirement.
Then why do they play a song from '67?
The commercials show those people surfin' at the beach, the 60s generation, flower power, etc. It's the 60s era, man.

What I can't figure out is why you're trying to compare radio with television-it's like saying, "well, they do obits in our newspaper". So what? It's not apples & apples.
 
Re: well, actually

DavidEduardo said:
Don62 said:
Then why do they play a song from '67?
The commercials show those people surfin' at the beach, the 60s generation, flower power, etc.
It's the 60s era, man.

Someone who was 13 in 1967 is just in thier early 50's now.

By retirement age, anyone with investments has long had a trusted advisor or financial institution. The prime candidates and in their 40's.

Further, we are discussing radio here. TV is used for older demos, although mostly via cable nets, because there is a good ROI against, at least, 55-64 there. And it is very efficient in delivery, since TV is program based while radio is format based; TV can pick up dollars by running some shows for 45-64, while radio can not dedicate a whole station to the demo as there is not enough revenue to be had to support a station 24/7.

I've heard the ads on radio as well. And I know what I'm talking about.

TV is analagous as well as newspapers because as the sage here has said, the latter is bleeding in "too many" (sounds like ageism here) grey-haired readers.
 
Dave /Cat...you both missed it. It is about demo targeting, whether radio/tv/paper/direct mail/billboards.

Your argument is that persons in a certain age group are not desired by businesses. If tv is used to target 45-65 yo, the demo is desired, but for different products. And America does NOT live in L.A., so who cares that the merchants/agencies there are misled, and no stations were bought for that demo. It's their stupidity and most definitely their financial loss.

MY argument is that it would be more/as efficient to use radio, and more specifically, the Oldies/Classic Rock formats to target Boomers..

The formats are viable, flexible, steerable, and just plain fun to listen to, as long as they have personality, not repetitive, and are live/local. Again, I have not heard any defense/praise of the blowing up of WCBS-FM Golden 101 and replacing it with a proven loser format, book after book. Also, no reply to the tremendous success of AM Talk / News formats, all Boomer driven, all with the same demo!

If I want to listen to a jukebox, I just turn on my Seeburg and switch on freeplay. I want companionship, and that's what radio does best. Or used to.
 
Oldies

Y'know, we can go 'round and 'round about oldies in TV commercials and somebody got a bank to buy their station and all that, the same 400 songs and "consultants" and on & on.

Gentlemen, it all comes down to this simple fact: with any radio format, if that format's demo is not a desirable demo for advertisers, revenues will be limited. In 2007, the listener composition of most Oldies stations, 55+, is not desirable for advertisers. Period.

If you'd like to be the one who thinks you can re-educate companies who spend millions researching and surveying their consumers, please go for it.

Just quit railing against the few of us who are open enough to really see radio's realities. What we're saying isn't opinion-it's reality, regardless of whether we like it/agree with it/accept it.
 
please

amfmsw said:
Again, I have not heard any defense/praise of the blowing up of WCBS-FM Golden 101 and replacing it with a proven loser format, book after book. Also, no reply to the tremendous success of AM Talk / News formats, all Boomer driven, all with the same demo!

If I want to listen to a jukebox, I just turn on my Seeburg and switch on freeplay. I want companionship, and that's what radio does best. Or used to.

Please don't use one example as a broad brush stroke representing the state of the format. I've said dozens of times CBS screwed-up with CBS-FM, insofar as how it was choreographed. They could have saved their bacon and rep by bringing Oldies back, even to 102.7. On the other hand, there's been barely a peep out of most New Yorkers that CBS-FM is gone. The "big protest" event they had drew, what, 300 people, just that one time? Hardly an uproar.

All of this is more important to most of you than it is to almost everybody outside of radio.
 
I am really enjoying reading the banter... I guess I conclude that if (by chance) somebody gives me a signal on am or fm in any market (large or small), I would do the following...

Realize 65% of the dominate stations in the ratings or billings will target 35 to 40% of the available audience/cume.... I will see which way all of them are flowing and going (since they've invested big buck to get the best signals and want a quicker return on the investment).... I will flow and go the other way to 'gobble up' the underserved audience that has the best ad and billing potiential... Sell that over ratings and create a niche or market within a market... Unless I have a high dollar-dominate signal investment.... Give me a little AM in the burbs and I WILL FIND something within a budget to make it turn....It may not be much, but at least it will be 'in the black'...BOTTOM LINE....
 
amfmsw said:
Dave /Cat...you both missed it. It is about demo targeting, whether radio/tv/paper/direct mail/billboards.

I already meantioned that this is about radio. And expleained that TV is program-based, not format based. On an average week, you have in a top 10 market about 25 FM formats to pick from and about 2 to 5 AM formats. On TV, you literally have thousands of program choices.

Similarly, in newspapers, you have sections, each targeted. I never read the classified or sports or food sections, but those who do are a well defined audience. And in magazines, we have tens of thousands of segmented,niched markets.

Yet in any top ten radio market we have, at most, about 30 viable (meaining they cover the whole market day and night) choices. Radio can not "niche" the eway TV and print do.

Your argument is that persons in a certain age group are not desired by businesses. If tv is used to target 45-65 yo, the demo is desired, but for different products. And America does NOT live in L.A., so who cares that the merchants/agencies there are misled, and no stations were bought for that demo. It's their stupidity and most definitely their financial loss.

I said that I checked with managers in 6 of the top 10 markets (30% of all radio revenue is in the top 10 markets, by the way) and there is so little 55+ agency business anywhere that you can safely state that the rule, with few exceptions, is that there is no 55+ business. As I siad, a station with 55+ numbers has to do local direct selling, generally at lower rates, in the larger rated markets. Evidence comes from stations like WDUV in tampa, #1 in ratings for more than a decade, but #14 in billing (and in Tampa, that is essentially nothing).

MY argument is that it would be more/as efficient to use radio, and more specifically, the Oldies/Classic Rock formats to target Boomers..

Boomers are, this year, at most, 61 years old. The first boomers were born in 1946. Most boomers are under 55, and they are sitll targeted. The issue, again, again, again, again, again, is that people over the somewhat arbitrary age of 55 (used mostly as it is a Census break point) cost so much to sell to that there is no profit when radio advertising is used. This is why, when 55+ is targeted, it is targeted in much more efficient and effectiv e media, starting with magazines, targeted TV buys, direct mail, etc.

This is about the ROI of radio, not about the buying power of 55+ (and only a small percentage of boomers are 55+ yet). This is about whether you spend a dollar in advertising and get back five dollars or whethere you spend a dollar and get back half a buck. The ROI is not there, and advertisers know this. This is why, from packaging to taste to portion size to name most advertised products in the USA are designed for under-55 consumers. The amount of specific 55+ products and services is more limited, and marketed differently for ROI and efficiency.

The formats are viable, flexible, steerable, and just plain fun to listen to, as long as they have personality, not repetitive, and are live/local. Again, I have not heard any defense/praise of the blowing up of WCBS-FM Golden 101 and replacing it with a proven loser format, book after book. Also, no reply to the tremendous success of AM Talk / News formats, all Boomer driven, all with the same demo!

The decision to blow up CBS-FM was terrific. It had gone form $40' million in billing in 2000 down to a projected $22 million the year they put Jack on. The mistake was how they did it and the format they did it with... totally inept.

But WCBS-FM had lost nearly half its billing over a 5 year span, and was sinking very fast. All the time, the market was growing, so you could say that they were projected to be off the 2000 mark in that last year (based on the start of year Miller Kaplan numbers) by over 50% from the high mark! Horrible, and they HAD to change... again, they mismanaged the "change to" and nto the "change from." Oldies was dead in NY, since that market is almost totally a transactional business market.

News talk is driven by the fact that about half the audience is under 55, and that is what the agencies buy. N/T is in horrible straites this year because automotive is off by nearly half, and the sub-prive and refi market have collapsed. Those two, last year, were the biggest revenue getters for the format. But again, when an agency buys n/t, they buy the 25-54 part of the audience, not the 55+, and they base the rate on 25-54 delivery. The problem is that every year, these stations age and they are moving out of the sales demos... shich is why there is a trend toputting such formats on FM where they do get better 35-54.
 
Dave has his facts and you can't deny them.... In depth research and not shallow as most seemed to base their positions on... :)
 
skippertthomas said:
Give me a little AM in the burbs and I WILL FIND something within a budget to make it turn....It may not be much, but at least it will be 'in the black'...BOTTOM LINE....


As a former Oldies listener I've been saying this on the '50s/'60s Oldies board for the last 5 years. It's good to hear it from someone who is actually in the radio business.
 
amfmsw said:
Dave /Cat...you both missed it. It is about demo targeting, whether radio/tv/paper/direct mail/billboards.

Your argument is that persons in a certain age group are not desired by businesses. If tv is used to target 45-65 yo, the demo is desired, but for different products. And America does NOT live in L.A., so who cares that the merchants/agencies there are misled, and no stations were bought for that demo. It's their stupidity and most definitely their financial loss.
Well stated.
 
Don62 said:
amfmsw said:
Dave /Cat...you both missed it. It is about demo targeting, whether radio/tv/paper/direct mail/billboards.

Your argument is that persons in a certain age group are not desired by businesses. If tv is used to target 45-65 yo, the demo is desired, but for different products. And America does NOT live in L.A., so who cares that the merchants/agencies there are misled, and no stations were bought for that demo. It's their stupidity and most definitely their financial loss.
Well stated.

Except for one thing... he is 100% wrong.

Agencies do not have "different" demos for LA than the rest of the nation. And the same thing that I can easily find out about LA buys I also checked on in 5 more of the top 10 markets... agencies have essentially no buys for radio for 55+.

Whether other media can attract some older demo money is irrelevant to this discussion of RADIO. There is, simply, in the rated markets, not enough money... even direct accounts, to successfully program standards. And there is a decreasing revenue base for oldies, explaining why so many oldies stations have disappeared.

And AM news talkers are, for thelarger part, seeing declining revenues such as KGO in San Francisco, off a dramatic $14 million and 30% since the year 2000. This is because the stations in that AM format are increasingly 55+, and are losing revenue despite high AM spot loads. Yet FM news/talkers like WPGB, with traditional n/t lineups including Rush, are increasing revenues based on bigger 35-54 numbers while AM n/t KDKA is off over 25% in the last 5 years.

Few advertisers in larger markets buy 55+, and stations with predominantly 55+ audiences show declining revenues to the point that they are no longer viable (like WCBS-FM).
 
skippertthomas said:
Dave has his facts and you can't deny them.... In depth research and not shallow as most seemed to base their positions on... :)
His facts are often skewed. Not everyone on this site in other boards agrees. He has his distractors.

"There were no 55+ buys in L.A..."
His constant refrain.

But LA isn't the US. LA is more of a national market compared to St. Louis, Tampa, or Youngstown, Ohio, where there may well be more advertising directed at listerner 55+.
 
Don62 said:
skippertthomas said:
Dave has his facts and you can't deny them.... In depth research and not shallow as most seemed to base their positions on... :)
His facts are often skewed. Not everyone on this site in other boards agrees. He has his distractors.

"There were no 55+ buys in L.A..."
His constant refrain.

But LA isn't the US. LA is more of a national market compared to St. Louis, Tampa, or Youngstown, Ohio, where there may well be more advertising directed at listerner 55+.

As I said, we are talking about agency buys. the bigger the market, the harder it is to make money without a lot of agency business... local agencies, regional ones or national ones.

If you are talking about Tampa or St. Louis, you are talking about two Top 20 markets, and viable stations in markets that big depend on agency business to make money. The same statement about 55+ buys applies almost universally.

As I have said over and over, the 55+ radio buys from agencies in MARKETS OF ANY SIZE are very, very, very, very infrequent. So a station in a rated market will have to depend on local direct business to survive, and most of this is at lower rates with the concomitant higher bad debt and slow pay issues associated with direct business.

I will cite again WDUV in Tampa, one of the markets you mention (#19 nationally). WDUV has historically been #1 in 12+ ratings for the last decade. For that entire period, it has never been higher in billing than 12th, and in 2001 it was 16th. Currently it is 15th in market billing with less than a third the gross billing of the #1 station (which had only half the ratings). Reason? 99% of WDUV's audience is over 55. (Easily verified with Arbitron and BIA data)

Youngstown is, on the other hand, market 117. The total market bills less than the single top biller in St. Louis, in fact, and is decreasing in billing quite horribly. In other words, on station in St. Louis bills more than the total billing of all 22 station in the Youngstown MSA. Now, Youngstown has no standards station (I wonder why?) but it does have an oldies station... one of 5 Class B FM's in the market. Of course, the oldies station is the lowest billing B there, with less than half the billings of the #1 station... and billings that are off by 15% over the last 4 years as the station gets older and older demos.

Still the Y'town station is off a lot less than larger market stations in similar formats (if they still exist) because there is far less agency business in Youngstown, as a precentage of revenues, than in a top 10, top 20, top 50 or even top 100 market. Keep in mind that half the US population is in the top 50 metros (MSA's as defined by Arbitron, not the OMB). Yet, still, the same rule applies; there is far less revenue available for 55+ leaning formats, even in smaller rated markets. And in the larger ones, there is not enough to survive except in a few, very few, markets with very old population age averages... like Tampa.

The highest billing Standards station in the US is KEZW in Denver. In the US, there are 1,290 stations in other formats that outbill that station. It is not even Top 20 in Denver billings.

How many other facts... verifiable facts... do you want?
 
Here's a fact. My stations are getting buys, locally, regionally and nationally, from direct and agents, that target 35-64 year olds on a daily basis, because they have the money. The stations are in the black, and ahead of last year. If you dig for gold and go to a coal mine, you'll come up empty. It looks like you're digging in the wrong spot.

Now, no agencies targeted 55+. It's a rediculous argument, and I know you're intelligent people. Why do you insist on screaming 55+ when no radio stations formats you or I are talking about are 55+? They're 35-64 for Oldies/Classic Rock. Big Band would truly be 65+, but to insist the other formats are 55+ is NOT a FACT. News/Talk? The few stations you spoke of are not a national trend.
 
amfmsw said:
Here's a fact. My stations are getting buys, locally, regionally and nationally, from direct and agents, that target 35-64 year olds on a daily basis, because they have the money. The stations are in the black, and ahead of last year. If you dig for gold and go to a coal mine, you'll come up empty. It looks like you're digging in the wrong spot.

An "agent" is not an "agency." In fact, I have no idea what you man by an "agent" unless you are talking about a rep firm which acts as a stations representative in buying centers.

But you have said, I believe, that you are not in a rated market. Everything I have posted has specifically excluded non-rated small markets and suburban situations where older demos can be successfully sold to local, direct advertisers who are mostly retail. Retailers, especially local and independent ones, really don't have a brand and demographic focus, so they can take their message to anyone... plus, by carrying multiple brands they are not in the brand-changing business anyway.

In the rated markets, and in proportion to how large they are, you can not live off local direct business alone.

Now, no agencies targeted 55+. It's a rediculous argument, and I know you're intelligent people.

I have now looked at agency sales in 6 of the top 10 markets and for all practical purposes, there were no 55+ buys all last year. That means that there may have been a couple, but against the thousands and thousands of buys "up" in a market, only a tiny and insignificant number went after 55+. In fact, the news of the last year or so is the trend to looking at 18-49 and its subsets vs. 25-54. So, there is even less higher demo business if this continues; there is talk of 35-64 becoming a secondary or occasional demo, but that is merely speculation based on the same "feeling" that the oldest of boomers have greater financial power than previous gnerations... with no truth or documentation that this appl.ies to radio advertising.

Remember that Baby Boomers are those born post-War (1946) until the late 60's (escalation of Viet Nam) so they cover at least 20 years. The oldest is not 61, but the youngest is about 40, and way inside the sales demos for radio. In fact, about 80% of the boomer population is still under 55!

Why do you insist on screaming 55+ when no radio stations formats you or I are talking about are 55+?

Oldies is predominantly 55+, and this is why so many larger market oldies stations haved disappeared in the last 5 years: it is a tough sell and most such staitons in larger rated markets (just so we are clear) have declining sales or have jumped to a better sales format or have become 70's based. Standards is nearly dead as a format... I can only find a few that have even halfway decent rated market coverage... because even for local accounts, the Glen Miller and Doris Day crowd, all over 65, is not very desirable.

AM news talkers are becoming very top heavy, which is why some have already moved to FM and new FM traditional talkers are starting to pop up. This is because the old AM demos are getting tough to sell, especially now that refi and sub-prime biz is nearly dead... yet moving to FM gets better sales demos... proving again that it is all about the under-55 market.


They're 35-64 for Oldies/Classic Rock.

Lots of formats have 55+ listening, but they can not sell the "piece" that is over 55. When a buy comes out for men 35-54 or 25-54 or even 45-54, the classic rocker does a ranker on the demo specs for the buy and submits a rate based on what the advertiser wants. If the CPP is competitive, they may get on. But they do not offer or price based on 12+ delivery. All agency buys are based on goals against the client demo, and the rest of the audience might as well not even exist.

Big Band would truly be 65+, but to insist the other formats are 55+ is NOT a FACT. News/Talk? The few stations you spoke of are not a national trend.

Here is an assortment of well known n/t AM calls whose billing has been declining in the last years as the percentage of over-55 listenership has increased:

WGN, WINS, WBBM, WSB, KNX, WBZ, KFWB, KGO, KCBS, KYW, WLW, KRLD, WABC, KOA, WCCO, WWJ, WOR, WLS, KMOX. I could go on, and the same is to be found in smaller rated markets. All are off in 2006 from whatever their high point was... if you index for 2006 dollars, they are off even more. If you index for market revenue growth, it is even worse.

It's a national trend, from New York to stations like WHAS in Lousiville (market 53) to KLVI in Beaumont, market 133 to KTWO in Casper, market 299. In fact, the only n/t staitons that are even flat are those with significant sports and play by play, since sports is much more 25-54 on AM and the revenue base is still growing due to sports marketing dollars. The traditional news and talk AM formats are, almost without exception (KFI being one notable growth AM talker), off in revenue.
 
amfmsw said:
Big Band would truly be 65+

Actually, let's not write off 65+ to only Big Band. The golden age of rock & roll (1955 thru 1963) fits the lower end of this group very well. And terrestrial radio ignores those nine years.
 
Question for AMFMSW

amfmsw said:
Here's a fact. My stations are getting buys, locally, regionally and nationally, from direct and agents, that target 35-64 year olds on a daily basis, because they have the money. The stations are in the black, and ahead of last year. If you dig for gold and go to a coal mine, you'll come up empty. It looks like you're digging in the wrong spot.

Curious to know what market size you're in and how many viable stations you compete against (a real number, not the signals that get into your market from 40 miles away)?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom