• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Are hosts becoming too hyperbolic these days about current events?

There was a funny error on Mike & Mike the other day, not funny in terms of what was said (but it speaks to a greater issue I have with national sports radio hosts) but who actually said it.

Mel Kiper Jr was on Mike & Mike In The Morning on Thursday previewing today's (Saturday) USC-Notre Dame game and Mel wondered if there was ever a game featuring 4 possible Heisman Trophy finalists and he honestly could not come up with one. This is Mel Kiper Jr. A GURU when it comes to major college football. Granted he subscribes to Mel Allen's (or maybe it was Red Barber) theory on calling horse racing where you block out everything about past racing so you can concentrate on the race at hand (except of course horses are generally forgoten by the masses after the race usually, here Mel is talking about something that is followed greatly and passionatly by millions all over the USA, I'd think remembering past events is key to talking about the sport) but how in the BLUIEST OF HELLS did he forget that all FOUR of the 2004 top canidates played in the BCS Championship game IN JANUARY!

What I mean in terms of the greater issue of Mel's gaffe is that ESPN's national hosts (and this is a TV thing as well) have a thing where they seem to want to be the first to anoit something as the best ever, or the most exciting ever, ect. Almost like they won't let history do the judging, they want to be right there saying that what we are witnessing is the absoulte best.

Perfect example, every September now Mike Greenberg keeps saying that he can't remember a more exciting pennant race, or that the current races are among the most exciting in recent memory.

What I'd love to hear is an actual breakdown of what these hosts do think is the top 5 or so of whatever they are being so hyperbolic about when it comes to the current situation, but that would mean that hosts would have to admit that something DID HAPPEN BEFORE LAST MONTH!

Steve
 
> There was a funny error on Mike & Mike the other day, not
> funny in terms of what was said (but it speaks to a greater
> issue I have with national sports radio hosts) but who
> actually said it.
>
> Mel Kiper Jr was on Mike & Mike In The Morning on Thursday
> previewing today's (Saturday) USC-Notre Dame game and Mel
> wondered if there was ever a game featuring 4 possible
> Heisman Trophy finalists and he honestly could not come up
> with one. This is Mel Kiper Jr. A GURU when it comes to
> major college football. Granted he subscribes to Mel Allen's
> (or maybe it was Red Barber) theory on calling horse racing
> where you block out everything about past racing so you can
> concentrate on the race at hand (except of course horses are
> generally forgoten by the masses after the race usually,
> here Mel is talking about something that is followed greatly
> and passionatly by millions all over the USA, I'd think
> remembering past events is key to talking about the sport)
> but how in the BLUIEST OF HELLS did he forget that all FOUR
> of the 2004 top canidates played in the BCS Championship
> game IN JANUARY!

They wouldn't have been "possible Heisman finalists" at that point because the trophy had already been awarded.

I can't think of another year in the modern era besides 2004 and 2005 where a few top teams had all the major Heisman candidates. This year, those teams (USC and ND) actually played one another in the regular season while the results could still affect voting. That's pretty important.

If Notre Dame and Army regularly played one another in the 30s and 40s, however, it happened every year back then.
>
> What I mean in terms of the greater issue of Mel's gaffe is
> that ESPN's national hosts (and this is a TV thing as well)
> have a thing where they seem to want to be the first to
> anoit something as the best ever, or the most exciting ever,
> ect. Almost like they won't let history do the judging, they
> want to be right there saying that what we are witnessing is
> the absoulte best.

Typical sports hyperbole. What do you expect? "Oh, man, I wish we were talking about last year's game instead! That was so amazing! The game we are discussing now is so boring and unimportant that even the players' families don't care about it!" Yeah, that'll work. :)

>
> Perfect example, every September now Mike Greenberg keeps
> saying that he can't remember a more exciting pennant race,
> or that the current races are among the most exciting in
> recent memory.
>
> What I'd love to hear is an actual breakdown of what these
> hosts do think is the top 5 or so of whatever they are being
> so hyperbolic about when it comes to the current situation,
> but that would mean that hosts would have to admit that
> something DID HAPPEN BEFORE LAST MONTH!



>
> Steve
>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom