• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Are there any big AM music stations anymore?

As David will tell you, the name was based on a listener suggestion of what the music sounded like to her. It was a format meant to please listeners, not music critics. Kenny G sold 75 million records, even though "real" Jazz fans hated him.

I think the name is no less meaningless and contradictory than "Soft Rock".
There's nothing contradictory about the term, "Soft Rock"! It doesn't fit into any category that came before it. "All My Loving" is Soft Rock. Simon & Garfunkel and countless others built an entire career around it! Older people wouldn't have touched any of it with a ten foot pole and dismissed it as "rock n roll" or some negative term!
 
A large factor is there are a lot fewer options on the Australian radio dial.
Sydney (with a population equivalent to that of Atlanta or DC) has 10 commercial stations (4 AM, 6 FM).
Brisbane has 3 AM and 4 FM. (Plus the government operates 3 AM and 3 FM stations in each major market.)
Fewer stations to share the pie equals larger ratings for all (eg. In Perth, 3 of the 4 FM stations have double digit shares.)
That's definitely true. Last time I was in Brisbane (2017), right in the middle of the city, I scanned both AM and FM and it was mostly empty. Brisbane is their 3rd largest city. Imagine so few stations in Chicago, our #3 market.

But again, 3 AM music stations right in the center of a city. Awesome for a radio geek.
 
after almost 30 years of the main station owners not caring so much about quality, cracks are beginning to show, in the form of mediocre sound quality coming from numerous stations, even when the receiver is of decent quality.
I will expand on this to add that there are still some AM stations that sound pretty good (mostly small ones that are owned either by individuals or small, regional corporations; the big corporatiuons (Audacy, Cumulus, etc don't seem to care much how their stations sound (KCBS AM has been sounding intermitently rather bad lately, almost like there's some faulty equipment), as long as they make money). KVOL near Lafayette, LA and WION in Ionia, MI are two examples I've come across lately. KVOL, in particular, makes good use of the full 10kHz that the FCC allows, and sound very good. I've compared their OTA signal (via the ScratchMoney SDR – which is one of those wide bandwidth SDRs that opens up to the full 10.2kHz – to the stream, and they actually sound quite similar (the stream is fuller and has stereo, of course). The OTA signal would undoubtedly sound much better through a decent hifi radio with wide bandwidth capability, but the SDR isn't bad. Perhaps the only thing they could do to improve their sound further would be to broadcast in AM stereo. Then it'd be a perfect example of AM at its best.

c
 
I will expand on this to add that there are still some AM stations that sound pretty good (mostly small ones that are owned either by individuals or small, regional corporations; the big corporatiuons (Audacy, Cumulus, etc don't seem to care much how their stations sound (KCBS AM has been sounding intermitently rather bad lately, almost like there's some faulty equipment), as long as they make money). KVOL near Lafayette, LA and WION in Ionia, MI are two examples I've come across lately. KVOL, in particular, makes good use of the full 10kHz that the FCC allows, and sound very good. I've compared their OTA signal (via the ScratchMoney SDR – which is one of those wide bandwidth SDRs that opens up to the full 10.2kHz – to the stream, and they actually sound quite similar (the stream is fuller and has stereo, of course). The OTA signal would undoubtedly sound much better through a decent hifi radio with wide bandwidth capability, but the SDR isn't bad. Perhaps the only thing they could do to improve their sound further would be to broadcast in AM stereo. Then it'd be a perfect example of AM at its best.

c

There's nothing contradictory about the term, "Soft Rock"! It doesn't fit into any category that came before it. "All My Loving" is Soft Rock. Simon & Garfunkel and countless others built an entire career around it! Older people wouldn't have touched any of it with a ten foot pole and dismissed it as "rock n roll" or some negative term!
You're absolutely right. My late step-father thought anything beyond Sinatra, Bennett, Clooney, Andre Rieu, et al. should not even be considered music, and he himself was a musician who was an excellent violinist! On the other hand, a great musician of the same generation, Mr Leonard Bernstein, for example appreciated the Beatles overall talent, and thought that their harmonies were excellnet!
 
I will expand on this to add that there are still some AM stations that sound pretty good (mostly small ones that are owned either by individuals or small, regional corporations; the big corporatiuons (Audacy, Cumulus, etc don't seem to care much how their stations sound (KCBS AM has been sounding intermitently rather bad lately, almost like there's some faulty equipment), as long as they make money). KVOL near Lafayette, LA and WION in Ionia, MI are two examples I've come across lately. KVOL, in particular, makes good use of the full 10kHz that the FCC allows, and sound very good. I've compared their OTA signal (via the ScratchMoney SDR – which is one of those wide bandwidth SDRs that opens up to the full 10.2kHz – to the stream, and they actually sound quite similar (the stream is fuller and has stereo, of course). The OTA signal would undoubtedly sound much better through a decent hifi radio with wide bandwidth capability, but the SDR isn't bad. Perhaps the only thing they could do to improve their sound further would be to broadcast in AM stereo. Then it'd be a perfect example of AM at its best.

c
It's very hard to find a wide band AM receiver these days. I'm lucky to have three such tuners: a Sony, a Sansui, and a good old GE Superadio! Here in Greater Los Angeles there are still a few AM stations that do sound particularly good in a wide band receiver: 1260, 1330, 1430, and 1540 as examples. There are others that in the past were truly Hi-Fi but now their modulators are tweeked only for voice frequencies and overall loudness. Actual fidelity is irrelevant. It's true noise levels have increased, but nearly noise immune receiving antenna designs do exist. There just has to be a market for them along with good tuners. Ah but we're just dreaming...
 
Just wondering if the (USA originated) AMAX AM broadcasting suggestions are used in other countires (I know AMAX may need to be changed some for countries that use 9kHz AM spacing)?


Kirk Bayne
 
Just wondering if the (USA originated) AMAX AM broadcasting suggestions are used in other countires (I know AMAX may need to be changed some for countries that use 9kHz AM spacing)?
AMAX is a proposed and never adopted AM "improvement" standard that is a third of a century old and impractical.
  • Nobody is buying new home or "at work" or portable radios.
  • Radios in cars are no longer interchangeable.
  • Nealy no AM stations even cover their own market adequately day and night; even with nice new radios there is nothing to hear.
AMAX was never, as far as I know, even considered in any other nation. In most, like our neighbors in Canada and Mexico, have tried to move nearly all AM stations to FM. In much of Europe, all or nearly all AM is gone.

In terms of triage, AM gets a black tag.
 

IIRC, Australia selected C-QUAM for AM stereo broadcasts - how's the sound quality from 4WK AM stereo?


Kirk Bayne
Good question, but it isn't easy to find an AM stereo receiver. They can't possibly have many listeners who have an old AM Stereo receiver around.

In addition to 963 khz, they used to have a lower power AM to cover Toowoomba proper. It was somewhere up near 1500 khz, but evidently now have an FM frequency for Toowoomba and shut that high end of the dial AM off.
 
AMAX is a proposed and never adopted AM "improvement" standard that is a third of a century old and impractical.
About thirty-some years ago was attending NAB and stopped by the AMAX booth. Put on headphones which was playing music via a small AMAX-modulated transmitter in the hall. Couldn't help but notice there was a significant whistle about 7Khz. Several of the sales folks were waiting for my impression, and after removing the headphones, my first comment was: "What's up with that awful whistle??" Their answer? Most people can't hear frequencies that high. AMAX= complete and total fail.
In terms of triage, AM gets a black tag.
Or a toe tag.
 
Good question, but it isn't easy to find an AM stereo receiver. They can't possibly have many listeners who have an old AM Stereo receiver around.
If I haven't said that here, the one in my car works. I can hear some instruments or voices from one speaker, and others from the other, with some songs.
 
You're absolutely right. My late step-father thought anything beyond Sinatra, Bennett, Clooney, Andre Rieu, et al. should not even be considered music, and he himself was a musician who was an excellent violinist! On the other hand, a great musician of the same generation, Mr Leonard Bernstein, for example appreciated the Beatles overall talent, and thought that their harmonies were excellnet!
Don't know who Andre Rieu is, but I pretty much agree.

I had to develop a taste for softer Beatles music because even the stations playing Sinatra and Bennett play them. Clooney was never on America's Best Music for some reason.
 
About thirty-some years ago was attending NAB and stopped by the AMAX booth. Put on headphones which was playing music via a small AMAX-modulated transmitter in the hall. Couldn't help but notice there was a significant whistle about 7Khz. Several of the sales folks were waiting for my impression, and after removing the headphones, my first comment was: "What's up with that awful whistle??" Their answer? Most people can't hear frequencies that high. AMAX= complete and total fail.

Or a toe tag.
You have got to be kidding! They couldn't hear this?:
I'm almost 70 and it jumped right out at me. Imagine what a 25 year old must hear! 8KHz was even worse. It almost hurt!

I went back and listened to more of this. I can clearly hear 11KHz but 12 is beyond my reach. It seems to me that I used to do better.
 
Last edited:
You have got to be kidding! They couldn't hear this?:
I'm almost 70 and it jumped right out at me. Imagine what a 25 year old must hear! 8KHz was even worse. It almost hurt!
I suspect they heard it, but in what amounts to a 'sales' environment like NAB, didn't want to acknowledge it. A colleague of mine sat down right after, put on the headphones, and pulled them off almost immediately: "He's right! What the Hell?".
The folks working at the booth turned around and started looking for more potential advocates.
AMAX was a total joke.
 
You have got to be kidding! They couldn't hear this?:
I'm almost 70 and it jumped right out at me. Imagine what a 25 year old must hear! 8KHz was even worse. It almost hurt!

I went back and listened to more of this. I can clearly hear 11KHz but 12 is beyond my reach. It seems to me that I used to do better.
That's like fingernails on a blackboard for me at the very start. Couldn't stand any more of it.
 
860 KONO San Antonio Oldies.... Listen to them Saturday on the way back from Belton Texas. Great coverage but their audio was horrible!! Too much bass and not enough mid or high end.. other stations I listen to sounded a hell of a lot better
 
I suspect they heard it, but in what amounts to a 'sales' environment like NAB, didn't want to acknowledge it. A colleague of mine sat down right after, put on the headphones, and pulled them off almost immediately: "He's right! What the Hell?".
The folks working at the booth turned around and started looking for more potential advocates.
AMAX was a total joke.
It actually can be worse...folks who went to one of the official GM sponsored demos of AM Stereo radios they were putting in their cars back in the early eighties, quite a few people pointed out that the cheapest units did not have a switchable IF bandwidth control like the best ones so those particular radios essentially sounded no better that than GM's regular non AM Stereo units. The reply: Most consumers have no conception of what's good or bad sound and are only interested seeing whether or not the red stereo pilot light is illuminated.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom