According to a story in the Toronto Globe & Mail, the companies have had an interoperable receiver designed for nearly a year. However, neither company wants to put it into production, probably because of the stock-price-killing "churn" such a receiver would produce (people changing subscriptions every few months as sports seasons change, as they get bored with a certain playlist, etc.). Additionally, manufacturers see no upside in producing such a unit; they'd rather produce proprietary hardware for one service or the other. So it seems that the design was done to get the FCC off their back, but nothing that makes switching services or subscribing to both any more convenient will ever be produced.
> I can't wait for a dual sat. car radio so I could have BOTH
> XM and Sirius without now having to have one built-in and
> one the other service via a portable on the dash!!! Both
> companies should realize that a lot of people that are
> willing to pay for one service will have NO PROBLEM paying
> for two. THEN let the programming decide if the listener
> gets tired of one of the services enought to stop renewing.
> That would be the market place at work! I've been told
> because the Sirius IP bus is an older design the designers
> need to wait until both Sirius and XM have closer data buses
> so dual radios could be made. I was told it will be at least
> two more years! The aftermarket people don't see a big
> enough market to go to the expense of back-engineering a
> solution. Though many did engineer the iPOD after market
> solution because they saw a bigger market for it.
>
>
> > - Inside Radio wonders if DC's XM and NYC's Sirius holding
>
> > back on making a radio that can receive both satellite
> radio
> > services. The Federal Communications Commission stuck an
> > interoperability requirement into the two satrad licenses
> > back in the 1990s - but apparently all they're legally
> > required to do is create a design. They've spent $5
> million
> > to do that but the Media Access Project says they're
> trying
> > to "stifle" competition.....
> >
> >
http://www.dcrtv.net/
> >
>