Dancerev889 said:
Tony Santiago said:
Dancerev889 said:
Tony Santiago said:
You have brought up a lot of good points, and one of the points I am starting right now in terms of getting more college radio outlets to consider dance (as WE know it, not just the electronica aspect of it) as a potential format. Of course the big problem being faced here is that artists and labels WANT to make money and of course, getting exposure on college radio means NO money since stations below 92 (not counting 87.7) are non-comms. Of course, not all artists and DJ's are like this and are happy to get whatever exposure they can regardless. I do think a "revolution" like this should start in order for the "big guys" to pay attention.
What are you talking about making no money from non-coms? Artists make money through non-coms just as easy as they do with commercial stations. Just because they are below 92 on the dial means nothing. These stations can make money as well. WRTI and WXPN in Philadelphia make millions of dollars a year alone in underwriting. C89.5 makes over 100,000 dollars in a pledge drive each year. NPR which a lot of non-coms run is super expensive but they still run it.
C89.5 had a very successful concert recently and it gave the artists tons of exposure. Our concert put 2000 people in the building and the local record shops were all raving that their sales went up for dance records especially the ones that performed. I think you might want to research the world on non-coms before making a statement like that. You are supposed to talk on a panel at a college conference, which I know am also speak at. Making those statements will not help the cause one damn bit.
So fine, I stand corrected! I never said I knew everything.
And regarding talking on a panel at a college conference, why do you think I want to "touch base" with you before hand. I'm trying to get as much as I can from as many sources as possible. Believe me I want to get it "right".
Geez...so harsh. Come on! ???
The reason I am being harsh is making statements like that is a slap in the face to all the non-coms that support this genre. You have an issue with stations under 92 on the dial and they have been some of the biggest supports of dance music. A lot of the key people at the labels worked at college radio. Ask John Parker about his involvement. Or Will Calder about what he did. Then you are going to speak at a college conference about dance music, how can you justify being there when you have repeatedly made comments on radio-info that basically say what a non-com does is not good enough for your coalition? College students read these boards. Nick is a Rutgers student that is passionate about this format and has a dance show. You have to understand college stations get little to no recognition because they are thought of as play toys for students. Ask Kris Henderson what the two of us had to go through to get record service from some labels back in the day. If it wasnt for Frank Murray at Robbins, Harry Towers and Cary Vance, we would not have the label support we do today. Non-commercial radio is making an impact in major markets and will continue.
And now you are twisting my words Brett.
My
OWN PERSONAL issue was about college radio following formats based on my own experience being blocked from doing dance because of a paranoid institution that felt I was "ghettoizing" the college...this back in the mid 80's. The campus station was "new wave", I wanted to do house. Others had specialty shows not catering to format, but they wouldn't allow me that opportunity. THAT was my issue.
Yes, doing a format is a way to learn radio (and that can be any format). However, if a person felt strong at doing a "specialty" show that wavers off format, then that person should be able to pursue that. For those on college radio that have dance music specialty shows, that is fantastic! Nick, Myke and others know how I feel and I encourage them to keep going with it!
But dance (as we know it) as a format on non-comms? I
NEVER had a problem with that....heck
I ENCOURAGE IT! Let's not get the Philly battle I had on that forum confused as a block to what you and Kris are doing in the region. I DO think the music has commercial value, but I'm glad there's exposure SOMEWHERE!
I've just learned about the panel conference today and I AM going. If anything, I'm trying to rally up the dance labels and artists to submit material for consideration on college stations that are open to doing such a format. You're going to be there? Great! Hoping to see Kris there and others on this board as well!
BTW, IBS IS going with my idea that I proposed last year, "Dance Music....when is commercial NON-commercial?" I brought this up because at the last discussion, I totally felt out of place because I knew very little about electronica.
So let's get things straight now. I'm going to rally up as much material as I can for this. I do understand others will be speaking on the panel and if you're one of them, great!
I don't mind arguments and if I am wrong about something, I do not mind being "called out" on it. But I'm certainly not going to allow anyone to twist words around...that won't fly. Sorry.