Atlanta now in top 10

[southernboy_404]

http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001012849

<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by southernboy_404 on 08/11/05 04:55 PM.</FONT></P>

 

[SquiggyFM]

No

I'm going to put in quotes from the article, which proves you didn't read it.

1. "...Atlanta...into the top 10 ranks at No. 10..."

2. "Detroit moved up from No. 10 to No. 9."

Class dismissed.

 

[grmf]

Re: No

> I'm going to put in quotes from the article, which proves
> you didn't read it.
>
> 1. "...Atlanta...into the top 10 ranks at No. 10..."
>
> 2. "Detroit moved up from No. 10 to No. 9."
>
> Class dismissed.
>


?? I guess I'm still confused oh wise one. "Atlanta No. 10," is NOT, Atlanta in the top 10. I counted on my fingers twice and came up to 10.

 

[billybarou]

Re: No

> ?? I guess I'm still confused oh wise one. "Atlanta No.
> 10," is NOT, Atlanta in the top 10. I counted on my fingers
> twice and came up to 10.
>


Yeah, me too.

 

[taylorengineer]

Re: No

> > ?? I guess I'm still confused oh wise one. "Atlanta No.
> > 10," is NOT, Atlanta in the top 10. I counted on my
> fingers
> > twice and came up to 10.
> >
>
>
> Yeah, me too.
>
Me three!! Gawd....I'm glad there are "talented" intellectuals to fill the void!

 

[SquiggyFM]

Re: No

> > I'm going to put in quotes from the article, which proves
> > you didn't read it.
> >
> > 1. "...Atlanta...into the top 10 ranks at No. 10..."
> >
> > 2. "Detroit moved up from No. 10 to No. 9."
> >
> > Class dismissed.
> >
>
>
> ?? I guess I'm still confused oh wise one. "Atlanta No.
> 10," is NOT, Atlanta in the top 10. I counted on my fingers
> twice and came up to 10.
>

The original post asked if Atlanta was number 9. Hence the "No" answer.

 

[grmf]

Re: No

> > > I'm going to put in quotes from the article, which
> proves
> > > you didn't read it.
> > >
> > > 1. "...Atlanta...into the top 10 ranks at No. 10..."
> > >
> > > 2. "Detroit moved up from No. 10 to No. 9."
> > >
> > > Class dismissed.
> > >
> >
> >
> > ?? I guess I'm still confused oh wise one. "Atlanta No.
> > 10," is NOT, Atlanta in the top 10. I counted on my
> fingers
> > twice and came up to 10.
> >
>
> The original post asked if Atlanta was number 9. Hence the
> "No" answer.
>

Well, I guess he fixed his mistake before I read the post.

 

[SquiggyFM]

Re: No

That teaches me to leave previous post in my reply. Not at all like what I'm doing now.

 

[MrBlutarsky]

Re: No

> > > ?? I guess I'm still confused oh wise one. "Atlanta
> No.
> > > 10," is NOT, Atlanta in the top 10. I counted on my
> > fingers
> > > twice and came up to 10.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Yeah, me too.
> >
> Me three!! Gawd....I'm glad there are "talented"
> intellectuals to fill the void!
>

Please make it stop...! I beg you...

 

[southernboy_404]

Re: No

> > > > ?? I guess I'm still confused oh wise one. "Atlanta
> > No.
> > > > 10," is NOT, Atlanta in the top 10. I counted on my
> > > fingers
> > > > twice and came up to 10.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, me too.
> > >
> > Me three!! Gawd....I'm glad there are "talented"
> > intellectuals to fill the void!
> >
>
> Please make it stop...! I beg you...
>
Yes, I made a mistake when I was quickly reading it.. So I went back & changed the subject. Jeeze, it's nothing to get ya thong all out of order.