C
content
Guest
With several choices out there for hosting and seguing playlists for Internet radio, what do you like and what sucks?
Marathon Don said:Yep, Station Playlist here, too. I spent weeks playing around with demos and trying to roll my own. IMHO, there's nothing better out there for the money.
DHMRadio said:Most of the DHM Channels use StationPlaylist, however a few channels use a program called AIR Automation which has been custom coded for the company, but i believe is just being released to the public for sale. It's a bit tricky to use but sounds awesome. A good station to sample that uses AIR is http://69.80.252.123:8080(DHM8: All Eighties)
StationPlaylist Creator is just awesome. It's such a powerful tool, so in terms of scheduling software i'd suggest Creator hands down![]()
radiobop said:Having 3 stations...Radio Bop on DRS2006 for 3.5 years, ROOTSofROCK.US on SAM4 for 8 mos. and Radio Bop 60s on Station Playlist for 2 weeks, Station Playlist wins hands down! I too looked at higher end options but Station Playlist is supported, adaptable, stable and sounds better in terms of transistions than the others. This weekend, we migrated ROOTSofROCK.US to Station Playlist and will be migrating Radio Bop within a couple of months (as we need to deal with in/out cues on 3,000 songs)...
Chuck said:radiobop said:Having 3 stations...Radio Bop on DRS2006 for 3.5 years, ROOTSofROCK.US on SAM4 for 8 mos. and Radio Bop 60s on Station Playlist for 2 weeks, Station Playlist wins hands down! I too looked at higher end options but Station Playlist is supported, adaptable, stable and sounds better in terms of transistions than the others. This weekend, we migrated ROOTSofROCK.US to Station Playlist and will be migrating Radio Bop within a couple of months (as we need to deal with in/out cues on 3,000 songs)...
As I recall, when I last looked at Station Playlist, it required having to set in and out cues for all songs. To me that was a deal breaker. I'm dealing with about 8000 songs, and the idea of having to go in and "fix" them is not at all appealing. That would take a very long time to do. Am I missing something?
Station Playlist had some nice features but, regardless of price, I just didn't think it was worth the time it would take to convert to make a barely noticeable improvement. If you were starting from scratch, it might be a different story. Right now, I'm dealing with an automation system that has been working fine for six years. In that time, I've become fairly proficient at fooling it to do what I want it to do.
So far I've never had a listener call in and say "your automaton sucks." Of course, most people don't complain, they just don't listen.
Bill DeFelice said:Chuck,
I was a similar situation with my web station. I was running the DOS version of the Digital Junkbox ... oops, Jukebox for about 5+ years and it would flake out without any warning whatsoever. With more than 9000+ tracks, not including imaging and holiday songs I wasn't all that thrilled with the work that would be ahead of me. I bit the bullet and did all the work and it was well worth it. StationPlaylist gave me a much better presentation and in the rare case I misprogrammed the scheduler StationPlaylist didn't take me off the air.
In my case it was my old automation that was causing me to lose listeners and it was StationPlaylist that make a marked improvement of the on-air sound.
Chuck said:As I recall, when I last looked at Station Playlist, it required having to set in and out cues for all songs.
mediadude said:Bill:
You're right - not every tool is right for every application. I am sure that you wouldn't purchase a Cadillac Escalade to run the French Grand Prix - you'd build a F1 car. Thus the differentiation.
Not here to argue the fine points - just to point out that we can provide a rock-solid solution for those who need it.