• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

BA "bashing" - An Alternative viewpoint

I know that some say "if you can't say anything nice don't say anything at all." But sometimes it is best to become aware that there is an elephant in the living room before it makes a mess. For 14 of the last 15 years there has been this unofficical gag rule regarding BA and the powerful little clique at its nucleus. R'n'R did an article in 1995 that featured some articulate, astute, and in retrospect extremely valid statements re: their concerns about this one company controlling so much of the format and imposing such a narrow focus. The introduction to the piece said that it was the last article they would be doing with critiques of BA's methods and assumptions. As if anything ever was totally black and white. After that everyone shut up.

Since then a small clique have ruled with an iron hand from a high horse while everyone assumed that since they had power they must be completely right and everyone else must be completely wrong. Then when the NY station flipped the dam broke and people actually begin to express alternative viewpoints, as well as bringing to light some of the strong arm tactics that this clique have used to maintain control and keep shortening the leash on both musicians and radio people. Finally the leash has gotten so short it turned into a chokehold and began to kill the genre in terms of image, quality of recorded music, and obviously the shift to lite vocals (often of questionable quality.) When someone comments on an incident they experienced with being bullied or called an idiot by these guys there is often this recogniton that "gee, I wasn't the only one." That is healthy, not negative.

Growth and evolution happen when there is an open exchange of ideas by a good sized group of people who don't all think just alike. Has our fear of appearing "negative" or of being accused of being a "know nothing" because we don't agree with the ones who hold enormous power contributed to the current stagnation? What if the concerns expressed since the format flips started, which are pretty much the same as the ones in the 1995 RnR article, had become topics to explore rather than to squelch?

It helps to know where you are and how you got there so you can get up, dust yourself off and move foward to build a more solid foundation. While one doesn't want to wallow in a place of criticism and negativity sometimes one of the most effective ways to begin to rise from the ashes is to point out the fact that there are ashes there to begin with and this is how they got there so the rebuiding can begin and we can all be aware of traps we don't want to step in or re-create.
 
Until there is evidence that BA is not to blame for the blowing up of smooth jazz stations across the country, I will continue to refer to them as "Broadcast Dilapidation". ;D
 
So who beyond Smooth Jazz affectionados and the musicians who create this music are aware that the ashes are there, and what can they do about it?

I suppose creating a competing, more exciting SJ package for syndication might be a start (and not that difficult to do) but the problem comes in convincing stations to flip to it. It seems that none of them have the "cajones" to program anything other than what's safe. Couple that with the record number of former SJ stations flipping away from it and you have even more trepidation from station owners or PDs to overcome.

At some point, of course, internet radio will explode as royalty issues get resolved and streaming audio in cars becomes more commonplace, and then the whole question will be moot.

But NO station who is serious about the Smooth Jazz format needs BA's offering and, in fact, is better off without it.

C5
 
Royalty issues are doing heavy damage to every artist and song that is not targeting mainstream radio formats, which is 99% of the cool music out there. It's not designed for airplay, wont get airplay, but all the other avenues of exposure are shut. Neither the artist or the content producer can afford the royalty payments required to stream a good amount of songs. It is killing podcasting, Which I think is more viable than streaming. Jerry DelColliano made an intersting point in his blog about the viability of on demand, portable programming. Give people an hour for their AM commute and one for the ride back..Small units of programming are much more interesting than automated streams, which are musically interesting but just don't have that connection vibe going. Right now SoundExchange/RIAA are making that impossible. Even if you have permission from the artists they often don't own the rights to their own songs and you can still get nailed.
 
AnotherCat said:
Royalty issues are doing heavy damage to every artist and song that is not targeting mainstream radio formats, which is 99% of the cool music out there. It's not designed for airplay, wont get airplay, but all the other avenues of exposure are shut. Neither the artist or the content producer can afford the royalty payments required to stream a good amount of songs. It is killing podcasting, Which I think is more viable than streaming. Jerry DelColliano made an intersting point in his blog about the viability of on demand, portable programming. Give people an hour for their AM commute and one for the ride back..Small units of programming are much more interesting than automated streams, which are musically interesting but just don't have that connection vibe going. Right now SoundExchange/RIAA are making that impossible. Even if you have permission from the artists they often don't own the rights to their own songs and you can still get nailed.

Yeah, Jerry's suggestion on creating targeted, daily podcasts has been making the rounds on several sites and boards. It's an excellent idea. But, as you say, royalty issues are killing podcasting and web streaming.

I have no doubt that the matter of royalties will be resolved in a sane, equitable way. It has to. There are too many people involved who want reasonable royalty rates and there are too many web radio services that are shutting down like MSN radio because the royalties are so onerous.

In the end, the RIAA and SoundEx will have to conclude that they are only hurting artists as well as the broadcast and record industries as a whole by stubbornly refusing to compromise.

C5
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom