• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Bad Bunny Super Bowl Halftime

There was a song released in the US in 1963 by Kyu Sakamoto called "Sukiyaki" which was in Japanese and became quite popular among American audiences.
 
Now, K-Pop, on the other hand, would qualify. Now that BTS is back together, I wouldn't doubt the possibility of them playing the Superbowl.

Bad Bunny should 100% invite a K-pop artist to perform with him at Super Bowl. I'd love to see him collab with BTS or the Huntr/X singers from K-pop Demon Hunters and make it a celebration of global culture in America. It would be a good counterpoint for our bad times.
 
There was a song released in the US in 1963 by Kyu Sakamoto called "Sukiyaki" which was in Japanese and became quite popular among American audiences.
That song was a traditional Japanese folk ballad and had nothing to do with sukiyaki (a food). It was given that name so it would be easy for Americans to pronounce and remember.
 
Bad Bunny should 100% invite a K-pop artist to perform with him at Super Bowl. I'd love to see him collab with BTS or the Huntr/X singers from K-pop Demon Hunters and make it a celebration of global culture in America. It would be a good counterpoint for our bad times.
That is a good idea, both specifically and in principle; a show reflecting the amalgamation of musical styles and origins would be a great show reflecting the traditions of welcoming different cultures. That would show both xenophobes and those abroad that, for the most part, America is a “culture of cultures”.
 
That song was a traditional Japanese folk ballad and had nothing to do with sukiyaki (a food). It was given that name so it would be easy for Americans to pronounce and remember.
Try Wikipedia or any other source before posting things like this. “Sukiyaki” was written in 1960 and recorded in 1961.
 
There are now threats to "boycott" the Super Bowl over the choice of Bad Bunny as the halftime performer:



It's a total lack of tolerance for other views. We see this all the time in radio. A station plays a particular song, and it infuriates the audience. "That song isn't rock," We saw it when KLOS did a yacht rock weekend. "That's not rock music," people said. We see it at country stations, where people say, "That's not country." Maybe not to you. Same thing with Bunny. The constitution says we all have the right to our views. That requires tolerance. No one's forcing others to change. But we all have the right to our own expression.
 
There are now threats to "boycott" the Super Bowl over the choice of Bad Bunny as the halftime performer:

Bad Bunny IS an American artist, from Puerto Rico, U.S.A. (Saved DE from having to point that out.)
It's a total lack of tolerance for other views.
The only thing the MAGA crowd would accept for the Super Bowl halftime performance would be some Country artist fervently singing the praises of their Lord and Savior, the Second Son of God, Donald Trump. Anyone else they’re going to complain about.
 
I'm reminded of Garth Brooks, who faced a boycott over his bar selling Bud Light:



One former fan claimed to have thrown away Garth's music for "turning his back on the USA," while another tweeted that they "hope his bar fails and he goes broke for what he said."

Tolerance. Not acceptance. Tolerance. That's what radio formats are based on. There was a time when talk radio stations presented all sides of issues. Not anymore, because the audience refuses to listen to the other side.
 
Try Wikipedia or any other source before posting things like this. “Sukiyaki” was written in 1960 and recorded in 1961.
According to my Japanese sources the song was taken from an old Japanese folk song (we'd call it a "lament" in English). It may have been rewritten or altered in 1960.

And, we all know how accurate Wikipedia can be.
 
There are now threats to "boycott" the Super Bowl over the choice of Bad Bunny as the halftime performer:
I don't see a boycott working at all. There would be hundreds of thousands of potential attendees snapping up tickets if they were available at anything approaching a reasonable cost.
 
According to my Japanese sources the song was taken from an old Japanese folk song (we'd call it a "lament" in English). It may have been rewritten or altered in 1960.

And, we all know how accurate Wikipedia can be.
It was registered by its writing team as an original composition. While it may have been inspired by a folk song, it was not the same as that song.

I cited Wikipedia because nothing else I found contradicted the information there... which is quite extensive and discusses all the later "covers" as well.
 
Tolerance. Not acceptance. Tolerance. That's what radio formats are based on. There was a time when talk radio stations presented all sides of issues. Not anymore, because the audience refuses to listen to the other side.
And regulations no longer require "balance" (although one of the "unbalanced" sources calls itself "fair and balanced" ;))
 
Bad Bunny was on Saturday Night Live last night, talking about critics of his Super Bowl gig:




 
Try Wikipedia or any other source before posting things like this. “Sukiyaki” was written in 1960 and recorded in 1961.
Wait.

Point of order, please:

Although occasionally spanking people here might be called for, but what did landtuna do wrong with that post? Radioonsys made the remark about the year. Landtuna was simply pointing out that the name didn't have anything to do with the content, which it doesn't. It's about a lost love, if I recall correctly. His point was interesting, correct, and informative.
 
Last edited:
Wait.

Point of order, please:

Although occasionally spanking people here might be called for, but what did landtuna do wrong with that post? Radioonsys made the remark about the year. Landtuna was simply pointing out that the name didn't have anything to do with the content, which it doesn't. It's about a lost love, if I recall correctly. His point was interesting, correct, and informative.
Landtuna asserted that the song was, or was based on, a Japanese folk song.
 


Back
Top Bottom