I made a similar point on Hal McCoy's blog: by restricting access to games (compared to what TV coverage used to be during baseball season), MLB's kinda shot themselves in the foot, resulting in attendance drops. Nice job by Mo (in for Lance) tonight w/Reds analysis.
I like the line "compared to what TV coverage used to be ..." because nowadays, it's easy to forget that as recently as the early 90s, seeing the Reds on TV was a treat. Channel 5 and their network affiliates carried, what, 50 games a year? Here in Columbus, our local Fox affiliate also carried Reds TV Network games but not all of them (unlike, say, WHIO, which did carry all of them). Seeing a home game on TV was a bigger treat because barely any of them were shown, outside the few WLWT and affiliates carried in addition to those shown by WGN, TBS or even ESPN.
SportsChannel Cincinnati carried maybe another 50 games, but they were a premium channel and not on basic cable like Fox Sports Ohio is today.
It was standard practice in many small to mid-size markets then, even a market as big as Houston, that not all games were shown. Full slates as shown by WGN, TBS and a few other networks were exceptions, not the rule.
I think it was maybe 2007 or so when televised Reds games exceeded 100 and a few years after that when FS Ohio began to air the entire schedule.