Wabbit Season said:
So who knows? Maybe it IS marginally better to have a syndicated morning show when you add it all up, but it certainly isn't investing in your product or your community. It's playing for the tie, rather than playing for the win and it's a crappy way to run a business.
Medical, dental, 401k aside, the Bert Show costs at least $20k to broadcast, depending on the market size I'm guessing; that's before ratings bonuses. In a four-book market like Charleston, that could mean upwards of $30k a year or more.
That's not an OPTIMAL full-time salary, but that kind of money puts another body in the building and on the air; that means more endorsement opportunities (and ad buys with 'em, obviously). That's another person on the streets doing station gigs and being a station ambassador.
Then there's this: if Bert's run like Kraddick, there's inventory within the show; the means the show's running spots on WSSX that Cumulus/Charleston gets nothing for, but certainly takes the perceived public hit for airing. I believe the affiliate gets 25 minutes per clock-hour to do as they wish within the three local breaks (8,8 and 9 minutes). That's where affiliates get to try wedging in a song (or two, if it's a slow time of year) and spots, local news, weather & traffic. That usually means 11-14 minutes of local sales inventory; your local show can conceivably get you 6-8 songs per hour and four 4-minute stop downs - which means the affiliate is actually losing avails (and thus, money) each hour.
Say, for shizz & giggles, the 'SX AM drive spot rate is $50 (for easier math); if they're ONLY losing two minutes of spot avail time per hour, that comes to $104,000.00 per year in lost income opportunity.
So for $20-25k per year for Bert Show rights, they're saving (gonna guess here) $75k in salary but losing (at least) $100k annually in income just within that daypart.
See? That local v. syndicated money comparison, see, isn't as black & white as folks want to make it out to be.