• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Best "This Week" of The Amanpour Era

L

Laurence Glavin

Guest
The best edition of "This Week" on ABC-TV since Christiane Amanpour took over the helm occurred this morning (01/30)! Smack in the middle of an interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, the satellite link to Egypt was lost. For a few seconds, the Z-man was heard uttering "hello...hello"...then with amazing speed, Jake Tapper appeared with the round table (is it REALLY round or oval?). ZB probably muttered to himself that something like this never happened on his daughter's show.
 
Not sure I understand your point completely, but I will agree that Amanpour is a specialist when it comes to issues regarding the middle east. Definitely, the right person in the right place for this situation. ABC is lucky to have such an expert.
 
searadiofreak said:
Not sure I understand your point completely, but I will agree that Amanpour is a specialist when it comes to issues regarding the middle east. Definitely, the right person in the right place for this situation. ABC is lucky to have such an expert.

Expert? Please. The only thing she has in common with that region is her last name.

G
 
Amanpour, for all of her expertise, is completely the wrong person for This Week. Save for the current situation, she not a good fit. This Week is a political show about current political events. However, since she took over the show, she frequently focuses on topics that have international appeal, but that also have little to with domestic current events. It is NOT what people tune in to for the show. I've also noticed that each week, George Will has less and less face time (probably because the topics are out of his area).

Sorry, just not what is needed, and ratings have reflected this. Tapper would have been a better choice and has been getting more and more air-time. I would expect a change soon.
 
upstate29651 said:
searadiofreak said:
Not sure I understand your point completely, but I will agree that Amanpour is a specialist when it comes to issues regarding the middle east. Definitely, the right person in the right place for this situation. ABC is lucky to have such an expert.

Expert? Please. The only thing she has in common with that region is her last name.

G

OK, since you don't think Amanpour is a credible reporter on this subject, give me some names of correspondents that could more expertly cover this story.
 
Garrett said:
Amanpour, for all of her expertise, is completely the wrong person for This Week. Save for the current situation, she not a good fit. This Week is a political show about current political events. However, since she took over the show, she frequently focuses on topics that have international appeal, but that also have little to with domestic current events. It is NOT what people tune in to for the show. I've also noticed that each week, George Will has less and less face time (probably because the topics are out of his area).

Before Amanpour came on board, This Week was just another Washington insider program, in which the same predictable guests said the same predictable things, just like they did on the other predictable Sunday shows. And the pseudo-intellectual George Will is especially predictable. He is fond of decrying other people's "entitlements", but the biggest entitlement in his life is his permanent occupation of a seat at the round table while others have to come and go - and it shows. A re-jigged This Week could be the current equivalent of 60 Minutes when it came on the air - a program that nobody thought would work but built up a huge following.

I thought 9/11 had cured people of the idea that international affairs have nothing to do with domestic problems. I remember that months before the Shah of Iran was toppled, the ferment in that country and Ayatollah Khomeini waiting in the wings in France was completely overlooked by US media, while the CBC and BBC were far more astute. The happenings in Egypt have the potential to be every bit as significant to us - whether for good or ill nobody knows.

This Week won't change dramatically overnight, but I believe Amanpour is the right person to change it from being just another Sunday show. And don't tell me the only measure of success is ratings; it's time the networks became less inclined to fatten their bottom lines at the expense of a properly informed public.
 
listener-in said:
Garrett said:
Amanpour, for all of her expertise, is completely the wrong person for This Week. Save for the current situation, she not a good fit. This Week is a political show about current political events. However, since she took over the show, she frequently focuses on topics that have international appeal, but that also have little to with domestic current events. It is NOT what people tune in to for the show. I've also noticed that each week, George Will has less and less face time (probably because the topics are out of his area).

Before Amanpour came on board, This Week was just another Washington insider program, in which the same predictable guests said the same predictable things, just like they did on the other predictable Sunday shows. And the pseudo-intellectual George Will is especially predictable. He is fond of decrying other people's "entitlements", but the biggest entitlement in his life is his permanent occupation of a seat at the round table while others have to come and go - and it shows. A re-jigged This Week could be the current equivalent of 60 Minutes when it came on the air - a program that nobody thought would work but built up a huge following.

I thought 9/11 had cured people of the idea that international affairs have nothing to do with domestic problems. I remember that months before the Shah of Iran was toppled, the ferment in that country and Ayatollah Khomeini waiting in the wings in France was completely overlooked by US media, while the CBC and BBC were far more astute. The happenings in Egypt have the potential to be every bit as significant to us - whether for good or ill nobody knows.

This Week won't change dramatically overnight, but I believe Amanpour is the right person to change it from being just another Sunday show. And don't tell me the only measure of success is ratings; it's time the networks became less inclined to fatten their bottom lines at the expense of a properly informed public.

Can I get an 'amen'?

I haven't tuned in to "This Week" in a long time, but I'm hoping you're right. An actual 'news' show would likely make me tune in on Sunday mornings, rather than yet another Beltway pundit backslap fest. That format is beyond tired, and everybody else is already doing it. And it's only done to excess nowadays because it's cheaper than actually sending reporters and crews out into the field. Paying a stuffed shirt to give canned, think tank-originated talking points on a news story cuts out a lot of overhead. And since said-stuffed shirt gets national TV face time, they're more willing to do it for free.

Amanpour has definitely proven herself as a field reporter, and she knows her stuff. I haven't seen her in her new gig yet, since I avoid pundit shows, but when she first got the job, I couldn't imagine her as ringmaster sitting at the head of a table with a bunch of talking heads. I certainly do hope ABC is looking to get away from that and in to real news programming for "This Week".

Anyone think it's a bit pathetic that the well-funded TV news operations in this country have to rely on al-Jazeera for Egypt footage and field reporting, because they're too cheap to fly their own people over there?
 
FightingIrish said:
Anyone think it's a bit pathetic that the well-funded TV news operations in this country have to rely on al-Jazeera for Egypt footage and field reporting, because they're too cheap to fly their own people over there?

Yes, and they only get away with it because al-Jazeera English is shut out from most cable systems. I think its a bit rich for US politicians to blast Egypt for censoring al-Jazeera when their corporate allies do the same in this country.

But then, we don't even get to see CBC or BBC News World. Instead we get BBC America which is mostly the worst of BBC programming, with some news thrown in which is dumbed down, following the example of how the US networks treat their audience.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom