If you look at the statistics in percentage of total population vs. inbound immigrants, you will see that new arrivals have never represented as high a percentage as today.This country was able to absorb 15 million immigrants in the early 1900s. That was when the US population was a fifth of what is now. Back then we built Ellis Island to handle it. We need that now. It's not the number of people that is the problem. It's the government's ability to handle it, process the paperwork, and get people settled. That problem has existed for 25 years.

Much of the issue today is about the kind of people who are arriving and who are admitted on their own recognizance. Just as Venezuela is exporting its criminals and social discontents, we are seeing many people who would not have been admitted upon review of their backgrounds.
And there are millions who have come in without being "registered". They come across, as they always have, in areas where there is an open border and little or no patrolling. Look at the area around the Big Bend and Ojinaga along the Río Bravo del Norte (Rio Grand to us) or in parts of southern NM or AZ and you can see how millions of immigrants have always passed through undetected.
Obviously, the economy of the US was different in the post Civil War through the WW I years. By the 1920's, it was determined that the country could no longer accommodate so many new arrivals and legislation and regulation were put into effect to limit it. Of course, the Great Depression and WW II also affected migration... again making the point that conditions were different..
It's also interesting to note that most of the Civil War to WW I immigrants were Irish, German, Italian in origin. They came from relatively similar racial and cultural backgrounds. Today's migration is much more diverse; some say that is a good thing and avoids cultural stagnancy while others find it divisional. And that's what makes for the content on different Red and Blue radio shows.
Last edited: