• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Bill Nojay on WYSL

vistua said:
Ok, lets just have an anarchic board ;D
The Voice of Reason said:
you never answered my question.
Click to expand...
Sorry! I didn't realize I was insufficiently clear.

They should have a news organ all of their own. I did not say that they should completely sever ties with WHEC. That's a thought. But it isn't required. What I view as a problem with WYSL's current setup, is that they are apparently, wholly dependant on WHEC's news production. I browse through WYSL's staff page:http://www.wysl1040.com/?pg=personalities I see no signs of any reporters, unless you count Luckey; I have reasons for not counting Luckey. The mechanism of rebroadcasting a newscast produced elsewhere causes all the flaws inherent in that newscast to be rebroadcast. For example: If Ms Blank on WHEC does a puff piece about children flushing their hot-wheels down the toilet (WHAM-AM Actually did do such a story), then when WYSL is broadcasting it, it appears one more time, to trouble the public.

More probably WYSL should gradually add reporters to it's staff.
Click to expand...

You make a good point about WYSL having its own news department. But again I believe that because of budgetary considerations it is more convenient for WYSL to just run Channel 10 news.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom