One thing I've wondered about NBC's coverage of the JFK assassination on 11/22/63 is how the realtively unknown (to a national audience) Bill Ryan happened to anchor the coverage that day.
Ryan at the time was primarily a local anchor, doing the WNBC-TV 6pm newscast (along with Gabe Pressman, I believe). I think he did do some of those little 5-minute news updates that NBC used to run in mid-morning and mid-afternoon (though without schedules in front of me, I'm not certain NBC was doing those yet as of 1963).
And yet, from the start of NBC's coverage, Ryan was obviously the "point man" and the main anchor, even in the presence of two more well-known network colleagues (Frank McGee and Chet Huntley).
My theory on this is that:
(1)While McGee was a capable veteran newsman, he had not yet done much anchoring, and was primarily known as a reporter and correspondent.
(2)Huntley, while certainly a national figure, a network anchor with a longer history in the news business than Ryan, the Huntley-Brinkley Report was primarily a scripted newscast, and he perhaps had little experience of covering live, breaking news.
(3)Ryan, while primarily a local guy, had perhaps more experience covering unfolding events live on a local basis, so perhaps as a snap judgment they figured it would be best to let him be the central "glue" to tie all the disparate reports together.
Any other ideas?
(BTW, can anyone link to a decent bio of Ryan on the Net? I've looked around and can only find the barest details of his career. I'd like to perhaps expand his Wikipedia "stub" as a man who so capably covered such an historic event deserves a bit more recognition.)
Ryan at the time was primarily a local anchor, doing the WNBC-TV 6pm newscast (along with Gabe Pressman, I believe). I think he did do some of those little 5-minute news updates that NBC used to run in mid-morning and mid-afternoon (though without schedules in front of me, I'm not certain NBC was doing those yet as of 1963).
And yet, from the start of NBC's coverage, Ryan was obviously the "point man" and the main anchor, even in the presence of two more well-known network colleagues (Frank McGee and Chet Huntley).
My theory on this is that:
(1)While McGee was a capable veteran newsman, he had not yet done much anchoring, and was primarily known as a reporter and correspondent.
(2)Huntley, while certainly a national figure, a network anchor with a longer history in the news business than Ryan, the Huntley-Brinkley Report was primarily a scripted newscast, and he perhaps had little experience of covering live, breaking news.
(3)Ryan, while primarily a local guy, had perhaps more experience covering unfolding events live on a local basis, so perhaps as a snap judgment they figured it would be best to let him be the central "glue" to tie all the disparate reports together.
Any other ideas?
(BTW, can anyone link to a decent bio of Ryan on the Net? I've looked around and can only find the barest details of his career. I'd like to perhaps expand his Wikipedia "stub" as a man who so capably covered such an historic event deserves a bit more recognition.)